11/29 Man, for a local text-based email program, pine is unacceptably
slow (yes i am on t1).
\_ use mutt. (http://www.mutt.org
\_ what's unacceptably slow is anyone who is still using pine
\_ use mh, its fast.
\_ mh: Command not found
\_ stick with pine. it's more your speed.
\_ I almost agree with this, but I suggest that you
run man nmh and have a look. Also fire up a browser
and search google for nmh (its just like searching
for W@R3Z and pr0n).
\_ And exactly why do you need speed in a non-gui email utility?
I've had more speed issues with jove or emacs than pine.
\_ Hear, hear! Worse is better! Pine forever!
Ease of use may not be 1337 but shoot, give me pine and NeXT
any damn day of the week.
\_ My ass; I used pine on NeXT. Maybe if your mailbox is < 1000
messages it's _bearable_, but hardly pleasant. Use mutt.
Play again. --dbushong
\_ If speed is what you want, just use 'mail'.
What, are you a lamer or something?
And anyway, if you have >200 mail messages, you are
a total l053Z and need to unsubscribe from some lists.
--troll
\_ or you should use procmail or slocal to sort your
mail in conjunction with (n)mh. mail is okay, but
mh is only slightly slower but much more flexible.
- mh troll.
\_ Perl::SMTP. |