10/17 So I was sitting in a cafe doing some homework and I overheard
two people discussing disciplinary action against this 14-year-old
Cal student who was "hacking" something on a campus library
computer. Mentioned was the fact that
a) no malicious intent was involved, "he just wanted to use his
own OS"
b) the dragonfly OS was installed,
but I couldn't find any info on what this could mean. These weren't
technical people, so they might have mistaken OS for application
These people were to decide what punishment was fair for this kid,
and they had no clue as to what actually happened. Does anybody
else know any details? Who is this kid? What did he actually do?
\_ He should be expelled and charged damages.
\_ Why are two non-techincal persons making decision on something
involving technical issues?
\_ because Congress has taught them that's the way things
are done in this country.
\_ It isn't a technical issue. This is an administrative
punishment issue. If you punched someone out on campus,
it wouldn't be a boxing/sports issue. Stop being an
elitist nerd.
\_ Except that if you don't know what "punching" is but
only learn from the book of regulations that "punching"
is prohibited and someone committed it, you won't be
able to decide on fair puhishment.
\_ I've never been a professional boxer. I know what
punching is. I've never been a professional sys
admin but I know what violating system security and
replacing the installed software is. The details of
the crime are not important. What is important is
that this moron did something wrong and must have
understood in advance that this was a Bad Thing.
He had intent. He didn't accidentally replace the
system software. Time to go back to HS or JC for
a few years and learn to grow up and then try a
real school again where other students don't have
time to sit down at a fucked up terminal this idiot
broke. Try hacking your corporate network, see how
*that* gets handled. Expect to lose your job and
get sued for damages far beyond your ability to pay. |