| ||||||
| 5/17 |
| 2000/8/26-28 [Computer/SW/OS/Windows] UID:19100 Activity:high |
8/25 Is it better to have VMWare on Windows NT hosting Linux, or to have
VMWare on Linux hosting Windows NT? Performance wise, that is.
\_ Is it a question you are trying to ask? Please read carefully
what you wrote and edit it until it makes sense.
\_ obvious correction made. don't be a prick. the motd's got enough
pricks as is.
\_ What? The motd is full of pricks?!! Since when? -ali
\_ prick
\_ prick
\_ What's your primary objective? What applications are most
important? What do they run on? There's your answer. -John
\_ I want to run iis7.2, kde 8.6a, and macpaint.
\_ You don't want VMWare. You want to buy one of those Sony
"my first computer" things in bright friendly shiny
pastel! -John
\_ buy another box.... unless you have 256megs of ram it's brutal
I only use VMWare (on Linux to run winbloze) when i have to...
if you want to run iis, just get a dedicated box or something..
\_ ram upgrade: $100. another box: $1500
\_ VMWare performance on some tasks (CPU and Hardware intensive)
task is really bad. You need a min. of a PII 400 + 256 MB ram
to get useable NT performance hosted under Linux. FOr 98 you
can possibly get away with a 300 + 192 MB ram. |
| 5/17 |
|