|
11/23 |
2000/8/26-28 [Computer/SW/OS/Windows] UID:19100 Activity:high |
8/25 Is it better to have VMWare on Windows NT hosting Linux, or to have VMWare on Linux hosting Windows NT? Performance wise, that is. \_ Is it a question you are trying to ask? Please read carefully what you wrote and edit it until it makes sense. \_ obvious correction made. don't be a prick. the motd's got enough pricks as is. \_ What? The motd is full of pricks?!! Since when? -ali \_ prick \_ prick \_ What's your primary objective? What applications are most important? What do they run on? There's your answer. -John \_ I want to run iis7.2, kde 8.6a, and macpaint. \_ You don't want VMWare. You want to buy one of those Sony "my first computer" things in bright friendly shiny pastel! -John \_ buy another box.... unless you have 256megs of ram it's brutal I only use VMWare (on Linux to run winbloze) when i have to... if you want to run iis, just get a dedicated box or something.. \_ ram upgrade: $100. another box: $1500 \_ VMWare performance on some tasks (CPU and Hardware intensive) task is really bad. You need a min. of a PII 400 + 256 MB ram to get useable NT performance hosted under Linux. FOr 98 you can possibly get away with a 300 + 192 MB ram. |
11/23 |
|