7/17 i think micro$oft's new language should be called C-
to match the grade i got in cs164 -- Social-Science Major
\_ WTF were you taking cs164 for as a fuzzy major?
\_ To take space away from an EECS major? BTW I didnt
really get a C-, but it's a better post that way.
The major is only fuzzy because Math, CS and Bio havent
figured it out yet.
\_ Anything that needs to add the word "Science" to it's
description probably isn't. Yes, including computer
science. -cognitive science alum
\_ Amen to that. Computer science is either math or
engineering, depending on which side you're on. And
cognitive science, is, of course, bullshit.
\_ No, Cog Sci is either linguistics or neuro anatomy.
Don't judge it from the cogsci 5 course you took.
-cog sci alum
\_ I am judging from CogSci100, CogSci101, and
CogSci110 courses I took. Linguistics is
all seem to warship at berkeley?
either bullshit or linguistics. 110/115 series
or the 130's. Neuro anatomy is neuro anatomy
and those who call it cogsci are simply trying
to cover the rest of cogsci's bare ass.
-- original poster
\_ oh, yeah? which of those is the idioitic
arguments of that anti-AI crusader who you
all seem to worship at berkeley?
\_ Wow, and this wasn't even me. -- ilyas
\_ I don't "warship" John Searle. He's a
pompous arrogant ass who has nothing to do
with anything. -cog sci alum
\_ I don't like John Searle NOR George Lakoff,
and yet I loved being CogSci at CAL. - Marco
\_ At least Lakoff wasn't an asshole
like Searle even if you don't like
his lecture materials. What'd you
not like about him?
\_ warship? We have a warship? Let's put our
football team on it and sail to Palo Alto.
\_ We have a speeling disfunkshun. |