6/12 \_ uctt, are you a contractor? what do you do?
\_ full time employee at my own startup now. never contracted in my
life. but i did spent some time in big 5 consulting managing
various e-Commerce projects and our team of consultants from big
5 was always much better than the employees in the client company
(that's why they were paying us $275-$350/hr to be there) -uctt
\_ No. They were paying that so management could have someone
to blame when it all falls to shit. No one pays you more
because you're more skilled. They don't have a basis to
judge your skill level.
\_ of course that's a big part of it. we'll take
the blame if it all "falls to shit". it's called
taking RESPONSIBILITY and i'll take the
responsiblity for a project in exchange for the
big bucks that they have to pay us. i've
met morons in consulting. i've met a lot more
morons that work as full time employees for the
client. -uctt
\_ You know why that is, right? The companies
that don't need your expertise don't hire
you. If there's a better staff in house then
likely they'll go with that. Granted,
sometimes management does stupid things
anyway, but I bet this helps explain your
experiences. --dim
\_ Holy cow! I find myself agreeing 100% with
dim. Hell has just frozen over.
\_ I think it's a great idea to hire
consultants when the current staff
is better. What's the matter with
you?!?
\_ Sorry, what was I thinking. I'll
call uctt right away to pay more to
get less.
\_ that's why nearly all of the largest and *best*
companies in the world employs a large number of
consultants. why doesn't sun, cisco, microsoft,
oracle, hp, ibm, etc... all just hire the best
talent and do all of their work in house?
certainly they have the money to hire pepole
right? why do they have consulting companies in
there if the consulting companies easily cost 2x
as much as their normal employees? oh...b/c
you know something that bill gates, john
chambers, scott mcnealy, larry ellison, etc.
doesn't know right? -uctt
\_ Your definition of "best" is what? You mean the
way IBM took a huge fall in the 80s? The way
Sun, Oracle and others needed the DoJ to level
the playing field? The way HP is falling apart?
Or that Cisco had to buy Arrowpoint because they
couldn't build their own load balancing switches?
You're confused. Big != better. The *best*
companies are the ones you've probably never
heard of. You'll know who they are 5 years from
now. These large but not best companies use
consultants because the *best* people wouldn't
work for them at any price. I'd be ashamed to
have IBM or Oracle on my resume. The *best*
people have all left these giant ugly slow beasts
for startups. It's still happening today. Don't
spend too much time convincing yourself how great
you are. The day you meet the people working
for the *best* companies will be the worst day of
your life as your giant ego comes crumbling and
tumbling down and all of IBM's horses and all of
Oracles men won't be able to put it back together
again. The emperor wears no clothes. I know the
exact same thing your top 5 list of CEOs knows:
that their employees suck, they can't hire the
best so they have to pay vampires and leeches to
do it for them and just pass along the costs to
their customers. It's people like you that make
software and hardware so expensive for no real
reason. You're not a value-add. You're a value
minus.
\_ who are you??? Preach it brother! you rock.
- anonymous#1fan
\_ Thanks. Just calling it like I see
it.
\_ Uh ... gee!
\_ so what are the best companies right now
that i haven't heard of but i will hear
about 5 years from now? and why is it that
most of the upper level executives in large
corportations have worked in consulting at
some point in their careers? just name a
few of these companies and we'll continue
the discussion... -uctt
the discussion...but i can tell you right
now that either their executive staff is
made up of former consultants, many of
their developers are former consultants, or
they just don't have enough cash for
outside consultants....YET. all of the
successful companies have used consultants
very heavily and they cannot all be wrong.
-uctt |