| WIKI | FAQ | Tech FAQ | |
 http://csua.com/feed/ | |
| ||||||
| 5/17 |
| 1999/12/8-9 [Computer/SW/OS/Windows] UID:17035 Activity:high |
12/9 Has anyone used C2config.exe on their nt boxes?
\_ There's no such thing as c2 compliant NT. The box isn't functional
after you follow all the c2 guidelines. Forget it. It's a cruel
marketing joke. And yes, I've done it. It's pointless.
\_ To make NT C2 compliant, you must take it off the network.
NT with no net is useless.
\_ That's for 3.51. For 4.0, you have to set the registry
to only be writable by admin users which is enough to
cripple most apps, especially M$ apps. Any box with no
net is useless. NT isn't an exception. Just curious,
does the original poster have some pointy haired moron
for a boss that wants everything c2 compliant because he
read how cool that is in a glossy quarterly trade rag?
\_ Win 98 retains some of it's usefulness without net
since it's only useful for playing games that won't
run on NT.
\_ I haven't read the c2 reqs recently but I doubt
that taking 98 off the net is enough. |
| 5/17 |
|