11/30 O.k. without breaking out the knee-jerk, John Birch society
nonsense, can someone tell me what is wrong with the WTO?
N.B. I don't want to hear from any whiny "their stealing our
jobs" morons either. If you don't accept the basic tenent that
free/open trade is good, you are to far removed from my values
for any dialogue to be useful.
\_ What's up with the knee-jerk "free market" is good nonsense? We
do not live in a free market economy in the US. The rest of the
world is even less free. IMO, you're confused about the way it is.
\_ the United States was formed to get away from being controlled
by foreign governments, but the WTO is superceding US Laws
overwriting the will of the people of the US, there it is sort
of like destroying your freedom and giving it back to the New world
\_ The WTO has only one goal: to make money for it's members at any
cost. I'm all forcapitalism but not the free wheeling totally
open no laws market the WTO fosters. For those confused about
the US, we do *not* have a free market economy. Our economy is
very controlled and regulated. That's why you can still drink
the water and breath the air (mostly). The WTO version of the world
would sell you a gas mask, bottled water from their water
purification plant, and serve you tuna with a healthy amount of
dolphin mixed in (as long as we still have dolphins and they don't
harvest the tuna to extinction). Money at all costs. There are
no other considerations to the WTO. If you like being able to
breath the air, drink the water, and walk the earth, you'll be
against the WTO. It has nothing to do with the JBS. Free and open
trade is good, but not totally free everything at the expense of
the future.
order scum.
\_ Exactly.
\_ What specific US Law is the WTO going to supercede?
The US is not an isolated nation. It's going to
have to trade with other nations, or lose out. So,
the question is, given the above, is WTO beneficial
to the US as compared to no WTO, or a WTO without
\_ I just love how a group that is nothing more than a glorified
the US. I agree that environmental and labor
concerns should be looked into, but this irrational
total rejection of it is silly.
\_ I rationally reject an organisation that seeks to punish the
\_ urlP? (riotP?)
\_ Will that effect my stock option price ?
US and declare illegal our environmental laws because some
South Americans were upset that we wouldn't let their
polution creating products into our country. I rationally
reject an organisation that seeks to punish the US and
delcare illegal our denial of tuna from other nations that
was not harvested in a dolphin safe manner. I rationally
reject the WTO and all other multinational mega corps that
are responsible to no one. I rationally reject the One
World Government. I'm willing to trade quite happily with
other nations but not at the expense of the environment
because other nations find sloppy tuna fishing to be easier
and more profitable.
\_ 1. you are right, it's mostly a bunch of whiney
"they're stealing our jobs that we would never do for that
pay anyway" people
2. They ARE stealing our spelling, apparently.
\_ woops, speaking of morons, apparently, i can lump me
into that group. However, you are being too kind
referring to the their/they're error as a spelling
error. Umm, i mean I MEANT to do that. It's a quote! i
was making fun of those people, dummy.
\_ No, you just can't spell. You're an idiot.
\_ jus love how a group that is nothing more than a glorified
multinational multi-corporation lobbying group uses a .org
domain name. Phillip.
\_ The WTO overturns local & national laws in the name of fair trade,
even consumer protection and environmental protection laws.
\_ Wow. S.O. couldn't convince the consumers pollution is good.
It couldn't convince the government. It couldn't BRIBE the
government. So now it's trying to make the government
irrelevant.
\_ what's S.O.?
\_ Standard Oil |