Berkeley CSUA MOTD:Entry 16151
Berkeley CSUA MOTD
 
WIKI | FAQ | Tech FAQ
http://csua.com/feed/
2025/04/04 [General] UID:1000 Activity:popular
4/4     

1999/7/17-20 [Computer/SW/OS/Linux] UID:16151 Activity:high
17/07   I just upgraded from RedHat 5.2 LINUX to RedHat 6.0 LINUX and
        latex and tex just broke.  Did this happen to anyone else?
        Any suggestions for fixing things?
        \_ You could reinstall tex and latex from the sources; I usually
           have pretty good luck with that.
           http://www.ctan.org/tex-archive/systems/unix/unixtex.ftp
           explains (tersely) how. Red Hat posts patches for 6.0 to
           http://www.redhat.com/corp/support/errata/rh60-errata-general.html;
           however I didn't notice anything TeX-related there. If you bought
           Red Hat, call them up for support. I'd suggest, however, that the
           easiest way to avoid this kind of mishap in the future is to
           backup and then reinstall instead of upgrading. -brg
           \_ Yeah, that is what I eventually decided to do after
              discovering some newsgroup postings indicating that
              RedHat's update mechanism is broken.  If anyone else
              out there is considering upgrading to RedHat 6.0, I
           \_ freebsd.
              \_ NetBSD
                 \_ OpenBSD
                    \_ Shaddup Theo
              wouldn't trust the upgrade mode.  By the way, once I got
              it working I was quite happy with 6.0.  The GNOME desktop
              alone makes switching worthwhile.
        \_ Yeah, stop 'upgrading' your system when nothing is wrong with it.
           \_ What kind of strangled-brain sysadmin punk are you? This is
              somebody's home box, for crying out loud.
                \_ I'm the kind who likes his home machine to just work and
                   doesn't mindlessly 'upgrade' it just because something
                   WAY RAD AND K00L is available.  Why treat a home machine
                   any differently?  You don't like your home machine to work?
                   \_ So I take it you are still using DOS 1.0 on your box?
                      \_ No, dork.  The phrase was "mindlessly upgrade".  Don't
                  _                                 _   _
 _ __   ___  _ __| |__  _   _  __      ____ _ ___  | |_| |__   ___
| '_ \ / _ \| '__| '_ \| | | | \ \ /\ / / _` / __| | __| '_ \ / _ \
| | | | (_) | |  | |_) | |_| |  \ V  V / (_| \__ \ | |_| | | |  __/
|_| |_|\___/|_|  |_.__/ \__, |   \_/\_/ \__,_|___/  \__|_| |_|\___|
                        |___/
 _               _                            _
| |__   ___  ___| |_   ___  ___  ___ _ __ ___| |_ __ _ _ __ _   _
| '_ \ / _ \/ __| __| / __|/ _ \/ __| '__/ _ \ __/ _` | '__| | | |
| |_) |  __/\__ \ |_  \__ \  __/ (__| | |  __/ || (_| | |  | |_| |_
|_.__/ \___||___/\__| |___/\___|\___|_|  \___|\__\__,_|_|   \__, (_)
                                                            |___/
        \_ I gave birth to Norby's love child!
                \_ I didn't know tara still logged in.
                   \_ Every so often, I think.  She's pretty busy with
                      the baby...
                \_ http://www.quotidian.com has pictures of Norby's love child.
                         use cheap straw man arguments.  They're childish,
                         and not considered clever after third grade.  And, yes
                         I *do* have a bootable DOS 1.0 floppy which was still
                         working about 4 months ago, thanks for asking, but no,
                         I don't run my company or home computers on it.
                      \_ So why is updating from RH 5.2 to 6.0 a mindless
                         upgrade?  Even if 6.0 doesn't have any features
                         which you consider worthwhile, they might be quite
                         useful for others.
                      \_ DOS 1.0 is even worse than its predecesor, CPM.
           \_ well, one can say that the nfs is borken.
        \_ my smb mounts don't work anymore after switching from 5.1 to 6.0.
           what gives?  has the command line changed also?
                \_ You might have to update your userspace smb tools;
                   /usr/src/linux/Documentation/Changes has a list of
                   the things you'll want to run at any particular
                   kernel rev. -brg
2025/04/04 [General] UID:1000 Activity:popular
4/4     

You may also be interested in these entries...
2006/10/25-27 [Computer/SW/OS/Linux] UID:44959 Activity:kinda low
10/25   Fedora Core 6 is out:
        http://fedoraproject.org/static-tmp/FC6ReleaseSummary.html
        \_ Anyone still use Fedora Core?
           \_ Why wouldn't they?
              \_ Because Ubuntu is a better and more popular distro?
                 \_ In what way is it better than RH/SuSE/Debian?
	...
2005/9/19-21 [Computer/SW/Unix] UID:39746 Activity:nil
9/18    I just installed Red Hat Enterprise Linux 2.1 and everything
        seems to work ok except my httpd cannot be reached outside
        of the box. I have no problem pinging and sshing into the
        system, but http connection would not work. However, it does
        seem to work when I launch firefox within (same machine).
        What could cause this? I'm not familiar with PAM and I'm
	...
2005/9/17-19 [Computer/SW/OS/Linux] UID:39720 Activity:nil
9/16    Where the hell is XF86Setup for Fedora Core 3?
        \_ xorg.conf . Red Hat switched from XFree86.
           \_ Eh? I'm using Fedora Core 3 and I have a fully functional
              /etc/XF86Config. It is the setup program that I'm looking for.
              \_ xf86cfg. Man, XF86Setup was outmoded about 4 years ago.
                 Where have you been living, under a rock?
	...
2005/2/5-7 [Computer/SW/OS/Linux] UID:36073 Activity:moderate
2/5     I thinking of installing Debian Linux because a friend of mine says
        it's much easier to deal with when you install programs. For example,
        during an insntallation the installer will check for ALL dependencies
        and automatically download the right .so files you need. The claim
        is that RPMs are not as thorough and that there's more work involved.
        Has anyone tried both RH and Debian and have comments on this? ok thx
	...
2005/1/5-7 [Computer/SW/OS/Linux, Computer/SW/OS/Solaris] UID:35563 Activity:very high
1/5     So who else thinks that Linux Kernel Development has gone haywire?
        WTF is up with this movement from an 8k to a 4k stack in the kernel
        that breaks tons of existing drivers that are ported over from
        Windows? And wtf is this crap doing on production distros like
        Fedora? Don't they realize that if you're going to have a large
        install base that you can't arbitrarily do crap like that anymore?
	...
2004/12/9-12 [Computer/SW/Unix] UID:35237 Activity:high
12/9    Has anyone had experience with using a file under NFS as basically
        a region of memory shared between separate machines? I.e., the
        machines lock the file and read/write it to communicate. Speed is
        not a huge concern, but can this be done reliably? Are there
        caching issues? Will fsync work properly over NFS? This doesn't
        seem ideal, but thanks for any advice.
	...
2004/11/3-4 [Computer/SW/OS/Linux] UID:34619 Activity:low
11/3    Is it just me or does Adobe Acrobat tend to go apeshit in Mozilla on
        Linux?  I've also noticed than on WinXP it stays running even after I
        close the page that was using it
        \_ Are you using Acrobat 6.0 Reader? If you are, downgrade to 5.0.
           6.0 has a lot of problems, period.
           \_ Acrobat 6 doesn't exist for Linux.
	...
2004/10/28-29 [Computer/SW/Unix] UID:34409 Activity:high
10/28   I just built a terrabyte raid server using linux. The distro is
        an older version of RH 8 (need it to keep compatibility with certain
        apps). I formatted the raid to be XFS. The server is an NFS server,
        and I appear to be hitting the 2 gig file limit. According to the
        docs I'm supposed to be able to get beyond the 2 gig limit with
        RH8. I have compiled a new 2.4.27 kernel to replace the stock
	...
2004/10/9 [Computer/SW/OS/Linux] UID:34002 Activity:kinda low
10/8    Anyone recommendations on a decent 64-bit linux distro?
        \_ There aren't very many, and the ones there are seem immature.
           Yer hozed.
        \_ SuSE 9 isn't half bad. Several of our customers are
           using it and seem to like it. RH EL 3.0 is okay as
           well.
	...
2004/7/14-15 [Computer/SW/OS/OsX] UID:32289 Activity:very high
7/14    I bought several Intel GigE nics and one of them has a
        bad mac addr (all ff's). dmesg shows the card as detected,
        and proc/pci lists it, but ifconfig doesn't show an eth*
        entry for it. Does anyone know how I can set the mac addr
        so that I can use the card? (I'm using RH 9, but I can
        just as easily stick the card in a WinXP, FreeBSD or
	...
2004/5/28-29 [Computer/SW/OS/Linux, Computer/SW/OS/FreeBSD] UID:30467 Activity:high
5/27    In what ways are FreeBSD superior to a good Linux distro?
        \_ Why do you hate Windows?
           \_ Why do you hate Linus?
        \_ *BSD has a better IP stack.
           \_ In what way?
           \_ Aren't they the same now?
	...
Cache (2395 bytes)
www.ctan.org/tex-archive/systems/unix/unixtex.ftp
Following are general instructions for Unix or other sites who wish to acquire the Web2c distribution, (plain) TeX, LaTeX (2e), BibTeX, Metafont, MetaPost, DVI processors for the X window system, PostScript, the PCL language in the HP LaserJet, and related programs. They are oriented towards building from the original sources, though some information on alternative packages is included in the last section. Please note that the Web2c distribution is a bare-bones distribution in source form, and building a complete installation from it is a non-trivial matter. For most uses, it is a better idea to install a distribution with pre-packaged binaries for your platform. Please consider joining the TeX Users Group (TUG) or another user group of your choice to help support the maintenance and development of the programs you retrieve. For actual installation instructions after obtaining the necessary sources, see *Note Installation::. Electronic distribution ----------------------- In many places we refer to CTAN:. You can also access CTAN via the World Wide Web, electronic mail, or NFS. Additional drivers, macro files, and other support are needed to build a working system. You can retrieve these distributions (but not much else) from the tex/' directory on that host. CD-ROM distribution ------------------- Numerous organizations distribute various TeX CD-ROM's (and DVD's): * Virtually all the TeX user groups collaborate to produce the TeX Live' distribution once a year; Other TeX packages ------------------ Many other TeX implementations are available in CTAN:/systems', including ready-to-run distributions for Unix, Amiga, Acorn, VMS, Macintosh, DOS, and Windows (in various forms). Although Web2c has support in the source code for many operating systems, and in fact some of the other distributions are based on it, it's unlikely to work as distributed on anything but Unix. It includes complete sources, and runs on all modern Unix variants, including Linux. It contains many TeX-related programs besides those in the core Web2c. However, unless you want to build your TeX library tree ab initio, it is more reliable and less work to retrieve these files as part of the above packages. In any case, labrea is not the canonical source for anything except what was created by Stanford TeX project, so do not rely on all the files available at that ftp site being up-to-date.
Cache (1311 bytes)
www.redhat.com/corp/support/errata/rh60-errata-general.html; -> www.redhat.com/security/
Security & Updates | 10 Documentation * 11 Security Response Team * 12 Update Release Notes * 13 RHEL Errata Policy * 14 End of Life Products Related Links: * 15 Red Hat Network * 16 Mirror Sites * 17 COE Certification * 18 Common Criteria * 19 Technical Mailing Lists Security and Updates Red Hat releases errata to address bugs, provide enhancements, or to fix security vulnerabilities. With each erratum we supply an advisory to give details of the issues being fixed as well as how to obtain and install the required software packages. Links to the advisories for our products can be found below. Security Errata are managed by the 20 Red Hat Security Response Team. Find out how to 21 tell us about a security issue you have found, or how to 22 get notified when new issues are found. Red Hat Enterprise Linux To facilitate customer maintenance cycles, bug fixes and enhancement errata for Red Hat Enterprise Linux errata are batched together into periodic "Updates". Security Errata are the only errata released independent of these Updates. To minimize the impact of Security Errata we have a policy of 23 backporting security fixes whenever possible. Red Hat Enterprise Linux has fixed life cycles to enable customers and partners to plan their resources, certifications and implementations accordingly.
Cache (638 bytes)
www.quotidian.com
This site has evolved, though, as life and the web tends to do. Although there's still one resume here, it's for someone who isn't job hunting but just doesn't want to create yet another broken link on the site. There's still a little personal information here, but since we don't have much time in which to update our pages, I wouldn't assume everything is still accurate. What we do have here, though, is a boatload of pictures of one very cute baby, and then whatever else we decide to do with the rest of the 150 megs of space we've been allotted. The "whatever else" is apt to change without notice, so don't be surprised if it does.