5/23 Anyone had Fateman for 264 (or even 164)? How is he as a
professor?
\_ I had him one of the times I took 164. He's a smart guy
but I didn't really jive with his teaching style. When I
took 264 under Savage Sue, I felt that I was getting a
much much better experience. -blojo
\_ Seconded. Sue Graham rules.
\_ I had Sue Graham for 164 and thought she was really good.
Why do people have horror stories about her?
\_ Because she is boring. And because she generously only
takes away 3% of your grade per hour (as opposed to the
usual 5%) when she finds out cochise died 3 hours before
the project deadline. -- ilyas
\_ She isn't nearly as boring as most profs and though
yes she is though, she is at least fair, which is
yes she is tough, she is at least fair, which is
more than I can say about some others.
\_ You don't want a smart teacher. You want a good teacher. IE:
someone who can teach the material well. There's nothing in any
of those classes any of the profs teaching them shouldn't already
know sufficiently.
\_ I had him for 164 in Sp '92. His lecture wasn't exciting,
although he seemed smart. I think he gave easy grades. -- yuen
\_ Easy grades are important (not being sarcastic).
\_ yah avoid a prof who gives easy grades. His class
will probably teach you nothing.
\_ Yeah you should do what I did and take all the
really smart, hard grading profs, learn a lot, and
see your gpa drop a full point. Good idea. Tell
the corporate recruiter that your 2.8 from Cal is
the same as another Cal student's 3.8 or a Farmer's
4.0 beause you took really hard profs! Yeah right.
\_ "We have a saying at Berkeley: 'If they want
to know your GPA you don't want to work for
them.'" My advice is go to a few interviews
for jobs you don't want sometime when you
aren't obviously hungry to practice being
a bit cocky. Sure some interviewers will
gag and not want you, but you didn't want
that job. In the long run you will find
yourself doing more interesting work for
more pay.
\_ Yup. That's exactly what I did. Why?
Because I didn't have the gpa for grad school.
Thanks for the tip.
\_ I gotta admit under a 3.0 is pretty
sad. (Which is what you need to get
over the grad school cut) Hell even
I managed that.
\_ You didn't take all the harder teachers
like I did and learn as much as me.
As I said before, take easy teachers,
get a good gpa. The rest is bullshit.
Don't fall for the idealism crap about
learning more.
\_ oh i didn't realize you knew
what classes I took. Sorry.
(As a matter of fact I tried to
avoid the easy classes cause I was
here to learn. I'm just saying
a 3.0 really isn't that hard to get,
at least not if you consider yourself
grad student material)
\_ You wouldn't have a 3.0+ gpa if
you took all the harder classes.
Maybe you missed the basic
concept that it *isn't* easy to
get a B or higher in a hard
class. Or maybe Cal has just
watered it down in recent years
to keep the grade inflated
self-esteem raised weeny kids
of the Baby Boomers from going
off the deep end and suiciding
when they get less than a 4.0
for the first time ever?
\_ Manuel Blum teaching 172 is a counterexample.
He is a very easy grader. I probably learned
more in his class than in any other undergrad class.
-- ilyas
\_ he's great if you get misty-eyed over Algol 60 stories |