3/30 Can root install the lastest version of perl?
\_ Yes.
\_ % mail root
\_ It's already installed. Use /usr/local/bin/perl, not /usr/bin/perl
--dbushong
\_ Why are two different versions installed?
\_ because freebsd is stupid
\_ Because soda is running a 2 year old version of FreeBSD,
when perl4 shipped as part of the OS and was "perl" and
perl5 was an option to be installed in /usr/local/bin?
Of course, if it were Linux, it would have been the
latest broken beta sitting in /bin/perl --dbushong
\_ former = perl5, latter = perl4
\_ which doesn't answer the question. Why are two
different versions installed both as a binary named
'perl'? Why not put 'perl4' in /usr/local/bin
instead of the confusing mess of having one version
down one path and another version down another path?
\_ Stop whining. You can always create sym links
in your bin directory and put your bin in front of
your path setting.
\_ Who's whining? Note that the question asked
was "why," which regrettably assumed there was
a valid reason (which apparantly there is).
Why is it whining to ask for people to answer
the question posed? I'm fully aware of how to
avoid the problem--however that wasn't the
question I asked. Thank you dbushong for
actually answering.
\_ Some people have confused a valid question with
whining to such a degree that they can either no
longer tell the difference or simply knee-jerk
their own whine about others' alleged whining.
Welcome to the motd. |