12.29 Does anyone know a good automatic spelling corrector for UNIX? -jnat
\_ There is no such thing as an "automatic spelling corrector" -
computers can spot words that it doesn't know, but not how they
should really be spelled. If you want a spell checker, try ispell.
\_ Sure there is. The accuracy is just kinda low. What,
you don't believe in AI? Surely we can automate automation!
\_ philspell
\_ if phil<whatever> is so great, shouldn't every phil program
just be one program? like phildoit. word processor? phildoit.
email? phildoit. quake2? phildoit. webbrowsing? phildoit.
\_ No, but PhilOS is currently under development.
\_ uh, phillip writes for Unix, not Winblows. -tom
\_ Tom, the original writer was looking for a UNIX program.
Where did you see "Windows" or "not UNIX" in there?
Maybe quake2 confused you? I don't see why phil can't
port quake2 in a few minutes with philport.
\_ Only MS (and to an extent Netscape) thinks that
putting everything in to one enormous package
is a good idea. -tom
\_ *bzzt!* Take a closer look at HP-UX and try
again. Monolithic kernel, and something like
a half-dozen utilities (with nine zillion
hard links to them) that decide what they are
at runtime by checking arg[0]. If you've
got access to the sources, get some Pepto
Bismal in you before reading.
\_ Only? Well well, The Tom Hath Spoken, Thus It
Shall Be! All Hail The All Knowing Tom!
\_What's the FTP site?
\_ ftp://ftp.csua.berkeley.edu/pub/phillip |