12/13 Star Trek: Insurrection is not worth seeing.
\_ I only hope the new Star Wars movie fairs better.
\_ "fares"
\_ Sad to hear karoake still exists in the 24th
\_ Karoake will never die.
\_ Wasn't THAT bad. Certainly not First Contact tho.
\_ I rarely post to the motd, but it was awful.
completely modern PC (polit. corr.) and boring, sigh.
\_ It is Star Trek IX after all - don't forget the curse of the
odd numbered ST movies. (At least it's not as bad as V.)
\_ Not the best. Not the worst. I'll leave it at that.
\_ It was no 2/4/8, but it was worth seeing. (So, is the next good
one going to be 16?)
\_ I thought VI was very good. Had the "smack the bird o prey"
scene that just made you say "DOOSH". (was a good enough shot
apparently that they felt it necessary to reuse the footage
in VII.. sigh --dbushong
\_ It was not worth seeing, unless you like preachy, poorly
edited, predictable movies with hackneyed plot devices
and bad acting. -tom
\_ The bad acting argument is lame since it's had bad
acting since TOS. I can't really argue with the
other points though.
\_ I've heard different theories, some say that 10 will be good,
others feel that it will be 16. I hope 10 is better than this
one, although no TNG based movie will every be as good as TOS.
I mean even Spocks Brain was better than most of this PC
(politcally correct) TNG crap.
\_ It's amazing that people like you who say all TOS > TNG, yet
still follow the current shows/movies. Are you actually
hoping it'll get better?
\_ Hope springs eternal! Besides B5, Stargate-SG1, X-Files
and Time Trax proved that it could happen. To bad about
B5 and Time Trax though.
\_ What's "To Bad" about B5? it had its full 5
year run as originally intended.
\_ It wasn't that bad. It is entertaining and worth seeing. |