Berkeley CSUA MOTD:Entry 13458
Berkeley CSUA MOTD
 
WIKI | FAQ | Tech FAQ
http://csua.com/feed/
2025/05/24 [General] UID:1000 Activity:popular
5/24    

2004/4/29 [Reference/Law/Court] UID:13458 Activity:high
4/29    Will Chateau finally go the way of Barrington? [restored]
        http://csua.org/u/748
        \_ Finally?  It was very Barringtonesque a long time ago, just much
           quieter about it.  Then Cloyne follows.
           \_ Well sure, but what I meant was, will the lawsuit shut it down?
              That's how Barrington got closed - the neighbors sued, and the
              USCA closed the house rather than deal with the lawsuit.
              \_ Is George Proper still around?  If GP is still the general
                 manager then it is just a matter of time until the whole
                 place wears down and implodes.
              \_ It is quite a bit more complicated than that, but it
                 started with a lawsuit, yes. My guess is that the USCA
                 will knuckle under to the nieghbors demand for a manager.
                 On a similar topic, did you know the the USCA will take
                 over control of Barrington again in just 17 more years?
           \_ Cloyne may be dirty and chaotic, but we're generally pretty good
              about not pissing off the neighbors (Goldman School excluded).
              \_ Is that why the UC is requiring a full time house manager
                 before they will renew the contract with the USCA?
                 \_ I thought that was Casa Z.
                    \_ Nope, it's the CLO
2025/05/24 [General] UID:1000 Activity:popular
5/24    

You may also be interested in these entries...
2013/6/3-7/23 [Reference/RealEstate] UID:54685 Activity:nil
6/3     Why are "real estate" and "real property" called so?  Does the part
        "real" mean something like "not fake"?
        \- without going into a long discourse into common law,
           it is to distinguish land/fixed property from intangible
           property [like a patent] and movable, personal property,
           like your car. Real property has historically had special
	...
2012/10/1-11/7 [Reference/Law/Court] UID:54488 Activity:nil
10/1    Photos of the Supreme Court in session:
        http://preview.tinyurl.com/8zuqc25 [slate]
	...
Cache (3862 bytes)
csua.org/u/748 -> www.berkeleydaily.org/text/article.cfm?issue=04-20-04&storyID=18687
Index of Sections Neighbors Claim $110,000 in Le Chateau Damages By MATTHEW ARTZ (04-20-04) Fed up with what they say is more than 25 years of strewn trash, raucous parties and a plague of vermin, 22 neighbors earlier this month filed small claims court suits totaling $110,000 against Le Chateau, UC Berkeley's most notorious student housing cooperative. The neighbors are each seeking the maximum $5,000 in damages from the University Students Cooperative Association (USCA), which counts Le Chateau as one of its 20 member cooperatives. The suits charge that the co-op, founded in the late 70s and known for its quirky residents that several years ago would invite homeless people from People's Park to camp on their roof, has created a nuisance and diminished property values in the neighborhood. The nuisance suits come at a time when Lewinsky acknowledges that behavior at Le Chateau is actually improving. Last year after a meeting with neighbors and city officials, the co-op adopted an addendum to its charter that set stringent noise rules and fines for residents who violated them. Six residents were fined last semester, said former manager Ryan O'Laughlin. However, the USCA refused to meet the neighbors demand that it hire a professional manager for The Chateau. However, there is precedent for installing a professional staff. Rochdale, a student cooperative, has had a professional manager since its inception and, USCA General Manager George Proper said UC Berkeley was pushing for the USCA to install a professional manager at Cloyne Court--another freshman dominated co-op--as part of a new lease agreement. Proper said Le Chateau--which sits on USCA-owned land--could one day receive a professional manager, but that the co-op board of directors would not tie any management change to the lawsuit, which the USCA has pledged to fight and if necessary appeal to the superior court. Should they lose, Proper guessed that the fines would be paid through reserve funds accumulated over several years by all 1,300 students who belong to the USCA. He added that despite a similar case more than 15 years ago, a legal battle wouldn't spell the end for Le Chateau. In the late 1980s the USCA closed Barrington Hall rather than fight a neighbor-driven lawsuit filed in superior court. The small claims case against Le Chateau is believed to be the first against a student co-op or a fraternity, but Berkeley Neighborhood Services Liaison Michael Caplan, said such suits are a growing trend in Berkeley and elsewhere. He is aware of three to five groups of neighbors considering filing joint small claims suits against owners of problem properties. Earlier this year a group of neighbors won their case against a neighbor they alleged harbored known drug dealers at his property in West Berkeley. In 1996 he and the USCA reached an agreement through Berkeley Dispute Resolution Services, but new managers and students who weren't part of the negotiations never honored the deal, he said. Co-op officials, though, insisted that the agreement reached last October was working and should have been given more time. He said the co-op had built outdoor storage cupboards to store garbage, hired an exterminator to prevent mice and rats that neighbors say are rampant, gave neighbors notice when they would have parties and provided managers with beepers so neighbors could contact them when issues arose. Ryan O'Laughlin, a former manager and current resident of Le Chateau, said neighbors often beeped him with frivolous complains including a loud pool filter and noisy nighttime dishwashing. He said this semester neighbors stopped beeping managers and started calling police. O'Laughlin understands that the tawdry history of Le Chateau, especially the unwelcome invitations to homeless people, has left neighbors dubious that a solution can be reached.