2/27 I noticed that most of the motd/wall participants are um, how do I
put it, not very young. Is there a reason why the youngsters in
general do not participate as frequently as us? Is it partly
attributed to these newer programs (aim/yahoo chat/msn chat) that
we older and less useful folks have problem adapting to?
\_ Because the wall is both boring and for insiders. It's your own
little playground. Outsiders aren't welcomed or treated
particularly well. Keep the wall, it's your thing, the motd is
more fun for the rest of us. To be honest, the less some of the
wall people show on the motd, the better the motd is.
--neither young nor wall user
\_ any other comments on wall users? How do you know about
how newbies are treated?
\_ the wall is publicly readable. why do you even ask how i
could know?
\_ I think the younger folk (at least me) are still dealing with the
shame of being computer dorks. The motd at least is somewhat
anonymous.
\_ I don't see how this answers the op's question. ?
\_ meaning the motd might be populated by younger types who
want to be anonymous. Eg, you know when a psb, scotsman,
tom, etc posts, but not when the newer guys do.
\_ Oh right. Well I'd like to use a nick, but I don't really
want certain people knowing it's me posting. Well one
person really. Actually that does have something to do
with my not wanting my true uber-geekiness revealed.
\_ Did we just have lunch? Dork.
\_ see, on motd you can simultaneously be a geek and
yet make fun of other geeks.
\_ Aren't computer dorks more accepted now than say a decade ago?
No one bats an eye if you say you killed time surfing the
Web or chatting online.
\_ That's not really relevant anyway, since only computer dorks
will see motd/wall messages.
\_ They can't spell motd.
\_ Kids these days.... |