Berkeley CSUA MOTD:Entry 12192
Berkeley CSUA MOTD
 
WIKI | FAQ | Tech FAQ
http://csua.com/feed/
2025/04/05 [General] UID:1000 Activity:popular
4/5     

2004/2/10 [Politics/Domestic/RepublicanMedia] UID:12192 Activity:nil
2/10    Hahaha, even O'Reilly is turning against the pResident:
        http://csua.org/u/5xf
        \_ [OP typo corrected]
           \_ That was no typo.
              \_ I was being kind.
        \_ At least he is (very belatedly) living up to his promise from before
           the war. First it was two months, then three, then four, then six.
           Still, I'm impressed. I'm sure you'd never get even that much
           \_ Well, Rush was high as a kite on some serious dope, you gotta
              cut him some slack.
        \_ Sigh, why is this such a big shock?  I've been telling you on the
           motd for a looong time that Republican != conservative and that
           Bush is no conservative.  Jesus, here have a cookie, live it up.
                --conservative
           \_ It's a shock because O'Reilly is extremely egotistical, and to
              see him sacrifice some pride for the sake of his word is quite
              refreshing.
              \_ Oh, well yes O'R is an egomaniac but he's a fun egomaniac.
        \_ O'Reilly is much more skeptical about the Bush administration,
           yet he blames the CIA?
2025/04/05 [General] UID:1000 Activity:popular
4/5     

You may also be interested in these entries...
2006/6/2-8 [Politics/Domestic/RepublicanMedia] UID:43261 Activity:low
6/2     "O'REILLY: And in Malmedy, as you know, U.S. forces captured S.S.
        forces, who had their hands in the air. And they were unarmed. And they
        shot them down. You know that. That's on the record. Been documented."
        ... unfortunately, the Malmedy massacre was SS forces murdering 70+
        U.S. soldiers told to stand in a field:
        http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Malm%C3%A9dy_massacre
	...
2005/1/25 [Politics/Domestic/RepublicanMedia, Politics/Domestic/President/Bush] UID:35889 Activity:high
1/25    http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,145330,00.html
        Your pro-Bush fanatic Bill says "The truth is the Bush
        administration has made mistakes in Iraq and in defining the
        new rules in the terror war."
        Fox is becoming more and more Fair and Balanced.
        \_ If you think O'Reilly is pro-Bush fanatic, you didn't see his
	...
2005/1/11 [Politics/Domestic/RepublicanMedia] UID:35647 Activity:high
1/11    Man, is this photo where O'Reilly looks like Satan intentional or not?
        http://www.cnn.com/2005/US/01/10/oreilly.clooney/index.html
        \_ That's the way he looks after he's been denied steamy hot
           falafel sex for 3 months.
           \_ "falafel sex"?
	...
2004/10/26-27 [Politics/Domestic/Election, Politics/Domestic/RepublicanMedia] UID:34350 Activity:high
10/26   so i asked earlier what major media outlets have actually
        endorsed bush this time around, besides the washington times
        and ny post.  I was accidentally watching oreilly last night
        and he was touching on this topic too, and said that
        the LA Times and NY Times had shockingly endorsed kerry but
        that it really didn't matter since no one reads the
	...
2004/10/13 [Politics/Domestic/Election, Politics/Domestic/President/Bush] UID:34099 Activity:high
10/12   Given that Bush is so inarticulate and stupid, how in the
        world did Al Gore lose 4 years ago?
        \_ the media decided to leave the "GORE SIGH" on endless
           repeat. - danh
        \_ because he's very "likeable" and "personable" in person. or
           so they say.
	...
2003/9/15-16 [Politics/Domestic/RepublicanMedia] UID:10198 Activity:nil
9/14    is there a used/2nd hand bookstore in the bay are that buys
        back technical/computer/sysadmin/oreilly books?
        \_ bet you can unload them on craigslist pretty easily.  And cut out
           the middle man...
        \_ does anybody still use /csua/pub/books ?
	...
2003/9/4 [Politics/Domestic/RepublicanMedia] UID:10069 Activity:nil 53%like:28046
9/3     This is probably really old, but still entertaining for O'Reilly haters
        http://www.rotten.com/library/bio/entertainers/pundits/bill-oreilly
        (work-safe)
        \_ How could it be old if it's referring to August 2003?
           \_ eh, I was confusing it with the Glick interview.  Anyways,
              here's the complete transcript of that.
	...
2003/9/4 [Politics/Domestic/RepublicanMedia] UID:10064 Activity:nil
9/3     Rather than resorting to personal attacks maybe you should articulate
        why Coulter's and O'reilly political beliefs are wrong.   Attack the
        ideas not the people.
        \_ how about the same for Franken.  His thesis, apart from all the
           partisan wrangling is very simple.  He points out some very specific
           examples of certain people lying.  And from that, O'Reilly, and
	...
Cache (1401 bytes)
csua.org/u/5xf -> www.signonsandiego.com/news/nation/20040210-0550-campaign-bush-oreilly.html
Conservative United States anchor now skeptical about Bush REUTERS 5:50 am February 10, 2004 WASHINGTON Conservative television news anchor Bill OReilly said Tuesday he was now skeptical about the Bush administration and apologized to viewers for supporting prewar claims that Iraq had weapons of mass destruction. The anchor of his own show on Fox News said he was sorry he gave the United States government the benefit of the doubt that former Iraqi leader Saddam Husseins weapons program poised an imminent threat, the main reason cited for going to war. I am not pleased about it at all and I think all Americans should be concerned about this, OReilly said in an interview with ABCs Good Morning America. OReilly said he was much more skeptical about the Bush administration now since former weapons inspector David Kay said he did not think Saddam had any weapons of mass destruction. While critical of President Bush, OReilly said he did not think the president intentionally lied. Rather, OReilly blamed CIA Director George Tenet, who was appointed by former President Clinton. He added: I think every American should be very concerned for themselves that our intelligence is not as good as it should be. OReilly anticipated the presidential election would be a close race, adding he thought Democratic front-runner Sen. John Kerry of Massachusetts would be a formidable opponent against Bush.