2/9 Hi folks, my girlfriend's friend got into a car accident on the
freeway involving four cars (perhaps minor body damage, everyone
apparently fine, cops did show up), and it appears she is at fault
(lost control, maybe bald tires). She got the minimum required
insurance through CA state, which was contracted to GE Auto Insurance
(now owned by AIG) in this case. She talked with an AIG rep about
details of the accident and they told her they recorded the phone
conversation, told her to hire a lawyer since the other parties
already had theirs, and sent her a letter saying she may be 100%
responsible for the accident. I talked with my brother who's a
lawyer (not his area though) and he says that usually insurance
companies provide a lawyer for you, and they end up settling with the
other lawyers for the full amount of the policy. He suspects that
they are not providing a lawyer because it's through CA state, and
that the lawyer she hires should find out why her insurance company
isn't providing one. Any comments on the insurance company not
providing a lawyer part, or anyone else who has experience with auto
insurance purchased through CA state? Thanks.
\_ the insurance company should be supplying a lawyer to
protect her! Unless it's a bad insurance company.
\_ It sounds like if you she can afford a lawyer, she should get one.
Try contacting these people, they might help, but don't count on it:
http://www.consumerwatchdog.org/ftcr/complaint.php3 |