Berkeley CSUA MOTD:Entry 11730
Berkeley CSUA MOTD
 
WIKI | FAQ | Tech FAQ
http://csua.com/feed/
2025/04/05 [General] UID:1000 Activity:popular
4/5     

2004/1/9-10 [Politics/Domestic/RepublicanMedia] UID:11730 Activity:nil
1/9     The final word on the O'Reilly-Jeremy Glick interview:
        http://www.frankenlies.com/glick.htm
        \_ look at the name of this website
        \_ See... They must have known Glick's position before his appearance.
           O'Reilly pulled him on to make what he thought was a point.  Instead
           of being polite, he turned belligerent.  It's his show.  It's his
           responsibility to set the tone.  This is what the flack is over.
           He's a waste of airtime and should hang up his mic.
        \_ Wow! It's like the having the motd on a website! And about half
           as relevant!
           \_ You learn ad hominem well, grasshopper.
              \_ So did the website author.
        \_ damn, I thought you wrote "Jiminy Glick" and I got all excited
           \_ me too
2025/04/05 [General] UID:1000 Activity:popular
4/5     

You may also be interested in these entries...
2006/6/2-8 [Politics/Domestic/RepublicanMedia] UID:43261 Activity:low
6/2     "O'REILLY: And in Malmedy, as you know, U.S. forces captured S.S.
        forces, who had their hands in the air. And they were unarmed. And they
        shot them down. You know that. That's on the record. Been documented."
        ... unfortunately, the Malmedy massacre was SS forces murdering 70+
        U.S. soldiers told to stand in a field:
        http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Malm%C3%A9dy_massacre
	...
2005/1/25 [Politics/Domestic/RepublicanMedia, Politics/Domestic/President/Bush] UID:35889 Activity:high
1/25    http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,145330,00.html
        Your pro-Bush fanatic Bill says "The truth is the Bush
        administration has made mistakes in Iraq and in defining the
        new rules in the terror war."
        Fox is becoming more and more Fair and Balanced.
        \_ If you think O'Reilly is pro-Bush fanatic, you didn't see his
	...
2005/1/11 [Politics/Domestic/RepublicanMedia] UID:35647 Activity:high
1/11    Man, is this photo where O'Reilly looks like Satan intentional or not?
        http://www.cnn.com/2005/US/01/10/oreilly.clooney/index.html
        \_ That's the way he looks after he's been denied steamy hot
           falafel sex for 3 months.
           \_ "falafel sex"?
	...
2004/10/26-27 [Politics/Domestic/Election, Politics/Domestic/RepublicanMedia] UID:34350 Activity:high
10/26   so i asked earlier what major media outlets have actually
        endorsed bush this time around, besides the washington times
        and ny post.  I was accidentally watching oreilly last night
        and he was touching on this topic too, and said that
        the LA Times and NY Times had shockingly endorsed kerry but
        that it really didn't matter since no one reads the
	...
2004/10/13 [Politics/Domestic/Election, Politics/Domestic/President/Bush] UID:34099 Activity:high
10/12   Given that Bush is so inarticulate and stupid, how in the
        world did Al Gore lose 4 years ago?
        \_ the media decided to leave the "GORE SIGH" on endless
           repeat. - danh
        \_ because he's very "likeable" and "personable" in person. or
           so they say.
	...
2003/9/15-16 [Politics/Domestic/RepublicanMedia] UID:10198 Activity:nil
9/14    is there a used/2nd hand bookstore in the bay are that buys
        back technical/computer/sysadmin/oreilly books?
        \_ bet you can unload them on craigslist pretty easily.  And cut out
           the middle man...
        \_ does anybody still use /csua/pub/books ?
	...
2003/9/4 [Politics/Domestic/RepublicanMedia] UID:10069 Activity:nil 53%like:28046
9/3     This is probably really old, but still entertaining for O'Reilly haters
        http://www.rotten.com/library/bio/entertainers/pundits/bill-oreilly
        (work-safe)
        \_ How could it be old if it's referring to August 2003?
           \_ eh, I was confusing it with the Glick interview.  Anyways,
              here's the complete transcript of that.
	...
2003/9/4 [Politics/Domestic/RepublicanMedia] UID:10064 Activity:nil
9/3     Rather than resorting to personal attacks maybe you should articulate
        why Coulter's and O'reilly political beliefs are wrong.   Attack the
        ideas not the people.
        \_ how about the same for Franken.  His thesis, apart from all the
           partisan wrangling is very simple.  He points out some very specific
           examples of certain people lying.  And from that, O'Reilly, and
	...
Cache (3069 bytes)
www.frankenlies.com/glick.htm
Hopefully In a chapter attempting to discredit Bill OReilly, Franken cites an interview that OReilly conducted with a young man named Jeremy Glick. Glick sadly lost his father in New York City in the events on September 11. After signing his name to a full-page anti-war ad published in the New York Times , he appeared as a guest on the OReilly Factor on February 4, 2003. The interview became the subject of a lot of discussion for quite a while in the media because things became quite heated between Glick and OReilly. In his book, on page 78, Franken writes that Glick explained himself modestly and eloquently. Apparently, presenting facts correctly takes a back seat as long as you sound good and your views are different than Bill OReillys. The interview began when OReilly said that he was surprised that Glick signed his name to an ad which, according to OReilly, equates the United States with terrorists. Bush was head of the CIA for less than one year under President Ford starting on January 30, 1976. After Jimmy Carter was elected President, he resigned, exiting his position on January 20, 1977. Second, the democratic government to which Glick refers was the communist Peoples Democratic Party of Afghanistan PDPA, who seized control of the country after a coup in 1978. Nur Mohammed Taraki became its President, Prime Minister, and General Secretary. The new government then signed a friendship pact with the Soviet Union. The mujahadeen was committed to combating the new communist government and any Soviet intervention. If the United States began aiding the mujahadeen six months before the invasion, this is over two years after Bush left his CIA post . Yes, he did, but only after the interview really took a sour angle when Glick went after OReilly personally. You evoke 9-11 to rationalize everything from domestic plunder to imperialist aggression worldwide. Anyone whos watched OReilly knows he is not the kind of guy to take an accusation like that lying down. Ive done more for the 9-11 families by their own admission Ive done more for them than you will ever hope to do. Following September 11, millions of Americans donated over a billion dollars to the Red Cross and the United Way. People believed that the money would go directly to the families devastated by the tragedies. Unfortunately, the charities had planned to put much of the money aside for their general funds and for programs like community outreach. But Bill OReilly, through his television program, successfully lobbied to redirect millions of dollars of that money straight to the families. Needless to say, after this point of the interview, the Ice Age had a better chance of making a comeback. A shouting match erupted when the two argued over the United States attack on Afghanistan to remove the Taliban. OReilly wanted to wind down the interview and began to make a statement, but Glick pushed to continue the debate. Glick would not be stopped, however, and OReilly finished the interview. Im not going to dress you down anymore, out of respect for your father.