Berkeley CSUA MOTD:Entry 11701
Berkeley CSUA MOTD
 
WIKI | FAQ | Tech FAQ
http://csua.com/feed/
2025/04/03 [General] UID:1000 Activity:popular
4/3     

2004/1/7 [Politics/Domestic/California, Recreation/Computer/Games] UID:11701 Activity:nil
1/6     Pete Rose is a liar and a scumbag.
        \_ I was shocked, shocked to hear that he had bet on baseball.
           \_ Casablanca reference acknowledged.
        \_ please tell us how you really feel about him
        \_ Why is he a scumbag, aside from betting on baseball and then lying
           about it?  I'm serious.
           \_ baseball elders get cranky when you bet on baseball,
              especially if you are managing a team.  ever
              heard of the "black sox"?
           \_ well what you mention is at the center of it.  It's also about
              him constantly pandering for attention, refusing to admit to
              truth, showing no remorse or guilt for wrong-doing.  If you
              believe Gioso, he also had no qualms about corking his bat.
              What about the insinuation that since he bet everyday on
              games, and on the Reds, who he managed, only sometimes, that
              the very act of "not betting" on the Reds is a signal that
              he thought the Reds might lose.  Oh, and perhaps the only
              reason that this news is hitting the airwaves "now," is
              because Pete stands to profit from a book, and the HOF
              announcement is today.
              \_ I hadn't heard about any bat corking.  Re: the gambling, I
                 think that although it was against the rules, it was not
                 "wrong".  Lying about it was, but not bad enough to make him a
                 scumbag.
                 \_ bat corking: http://csua.org/u/5g1
                    also, the gambling is wrong.  Again, do you really think
                    Pete would manage the same when he bet for the Reds to
                    win and when he did not bet for the Reds to win?  What
                    about blowing out a pitcher's arm in May in order to get
                    that crucial last inning when there's 5 months of
                    baseball left?  Furthermore, Pete had to know that not
                    betting on the Reds would signal the mob bosses.  How
                    hard do you think he played to win while he had that
                    knowledge.
                    \_ I would expect that rather than doing a half-assed job
                       when he didn't have any bets going, it's more likely
                       that he placed bets when he had "inside information"
                       which favored the Reds.  This would be insider trading
                       with respect to his bookie, but that doesn't bother me.
                       \_ of course he had inside information. he was their
                          manager.  What about the situation which may or may
                          not have happened where he gets pressure put on him
                          by mob bosses to whom he owes money to throw a game?
                          If the betting on baseball doesn't bother you, and
                          the inherent conflict in interest involved, whether
                          he was betting to win or to lose, and the lying,
                          public pandering, and insincere begging he has done
                          in public since 1989 don't bother you, then maybe
                          in your eyes he's not a scumbag.  These things do
                          bother me, however.  In general, it's been his
                          character, his willingness to do anything for a $,
                          and his willingness to do anything, say anything
                          to get back into the HOF regardless of what he hurts
                          or what he has to say to do it.
                          \_ some people just don't care about character.  to
                             them there is nothing someone can do that is
                             'wrong' or immoral because they don't believe in
                             morality.  anything that someone can get away
                             with is ok because they have no sense of right
                             and wrong.  you're wasting your time trying to
                             explain immorality to someone that has no morals.
                             \_ you people are incredible. we just had a thread
                                about how EVIL teachers are bleeding the
                                taxpayer dry with their 30k/yr salaries for
                                teaching kids, but when it comes to baseball
                                teams
                                subsidised by the taxpayer for the profit
                                of a few millionares all you fuckers
                                care about is who gambled or cheated.
                                \_ 30k/year?  Bullshit.  In CA, try 50k for
                                   passing the 10th grade level exam and 70-80k
                                   for taking a few night or summer classes and
                                   getting an "advanced" teaching credential or
                                   "masters" in education from *any* third rate
                                   school.  You're so full of crap.  You know
                                   nothing about the teacher's union or
                                   teaching.  You're not even trolling anymore.
                                   You're just spreading outright lies and
                                   complete misinformation at best.  Please
                                   just go away.
        \_ Is there anything more boring than baseball.  I'd rather watch
           grass grow.
           \_ Yes, there is.  It's called Cricket.
2025/04/03 [General] UID:1000 Activity:popular
4/3     

You may also be interested in these entries...
2010/7/3-20 [Recreation/Sports] UID:53872 Activity:nil
7/3     ARG 0 - 4 GER!  That's a huge spread.  What was wrong with Argentina?
        \_ You give a damn about soccer?  What's wrong with you?
           \_ Giving a damn about the World Cup != giving a damn about soccer.
              This has been an exciting, topsy-turvy tournament. Maradona must
              be tearing his (incredibly absurdly dyed) hair out.
        \- re: "what is wrong with ARG" ... against a good team you need
	...
2010/6/11-30 [Recreation/Sports] UID:53859 Activity:nil
6/9     Synchronized Macarana-esque dance after first 2010 World Cup goal.
        http://www.csua.org/u/qy2
        Oh no, the same disease that has plagued football here at home is now
        spreading to soccer abroad.
        \- You may be too young to remember ROGER MILLA and the DANCE OF THE
           CORNER. Did you see BISHOP D.TUTU dancing? That was pretty funny.
	...
Cache (2476 bytes)
csua.org/u/5g1 -> redsox.bostonherald.com/otherMLB/otherMLB.bg?articleid=185
Dont bet on it: Ex-sidekick: Petes not telling all By Jack Sullivan Tuesday, January 6, 2004 P ete Roses former sidekick said yesterday the all-time Hit King is continuing to lie in his gambling confession by claiming he never bet on games from the Cincinnati Reds clubhouse. Yes, absolutely he bet from the clubhouse, said Tommy Gioiosa, a New Bedford native who met the disgraced All Star in 1978 and became Roses confidant, housemate and runner for bets for the next 10 years. Hed call Tigers manager Sparky Anderson, Dodgers manager Tommy Lasorda, asking about how their pitchers were, who was playing and stuff and then hed hang up, laughing like a kid, saying like, I got good information, said Gioiosa, who now lives in Florida. Rose, Major League Baseballs most prolific hitter with 4,256 hits, has finally confessed to betting on baseball nearly 14 years after the late Commissioner A. Bartlett Giamatti banished him for life for violating the games cardinal rule on gambling. Until now, Rose has maintained he never bet on baseball, but in his new book slated to be released Thursday and in an interview on ABC News Primetime Live scheduled to air the same day, he finally admits what nearly everyone suspected and the Dowd Report detailed in 1989. Finally the temptation got too strong, and during the 1987 season, I began betting regularly in the sport I knew best - baseball, he says in the book. I was betting on baseball while I was managing a Major League club during the regular season. In the book, Rose says he admitted his baseball gambling to Commissioner Bud Selig in hopes of having his lifetime banishment lifted and enabling him to be eligible for the Hall of Fame. But former Commissioner Fay Vincent, who oversaw the investigation into Roses gambling as deputy commissioner under Giamatti, said Roses mea culpa is half-hearted at best and is aimed at only maximizing the baseball outcasts earning power. Vincent is also miffed that Selig, who declined comment until the book is released, sat on Roses confession for more than a year and allowed Rose to maximize his book sales by releasing it the week that Hall of Fame inductees are announced. Gioiosa said he holds no animosity toward Rose, saying the singles king has an addiction that took hold and kept hold for a long time. Gioiosa said Rose never saw betting on baseball as cheating, adding the slap hitter also never saw putting cork in his bat near the end of his career as cheating either.