| ||||||
| 5/17 |
| 2004/1/7 [Politics/Domestic/California, Recreation/Computer/Games] UID:11701 Activity:nil |
1/6 Pete Rose is a liar and a scumbag.
\_ I was shocked, shocked to hear that he had bet on baseball.
\_ Casablanca reference acknowledged.
\_ please tell us how you really feel about him
\_ Why is he a scumbag, aside from betting on baseball and then lying
about it? I'm serious.
\_ baseball elders get cranky when you bet on baseball,
especially if you are managing a team. ever
heard of the "black sox"?
\_ well what you mention is at the center of it. It's also about
him constantly pandering for attention, refusing to admit to
truth, showing no remorse or guilt for wrong-doing. If you
believe Gioso, he also had no qualms about corking his bat.
What about the insinuation that since he bet everyday on
games, and on the Reds, who he managed, only sometimes, that
the very act of "not betting" on the Reds is a signal that
he thought the Reds might lose. Oh, and perhaps the only
reason that this news is hitting the airwaves "now," is
because Pete stands to profit from a book, and the HOF
announcement is today.
\_ I hadn't heard about any bat corking. Re: the gambling, I
think that although it was against the rules, it was not
"wrong". Lying about it was, but not bad enough to make him a
scumbag.
\_ bat corking: http://csua.org/u/5g1
also, the gambling is wrong. Again, do you really think
Pete would manage the same when he bet for the Reds to
win and when he did not bet for the Reds to win? What
about blowing out a pitcher's arm in May in order to get
that crucial last inning when there's 5 months of
baseball left? Furthermore, Pete had to know that not
betting on the Reds would signal the mob bosses. How
hard do you think he played to win while he had that
knowledge.
\_ I would expect that rather than doing a half-assed job
when he didn't have any bets going, it's more likely
that he placed bets when he had "inside information"
which favored the Reds. This would be insider trading
with respect to his bookie, but that doesn't bother me.
\_ of course he had inside information. he was their
manager. What about the situation which may or may
not have happened where he gets pressure put on him
by mob bosses to whom he owes money to throw a game?
If the betting on baseball doesn't bother you, and
the inherent conflict in interest involved, whether
he was betting to win or to lose, and the lying,
public pandering, and insincere begging he has done
in public since 1989 don't bother you, then maybe
in your eyes he's not a scumbag. These things do
bother me, however. In general, it's been his
character, his willingness to do anything for a $,
and his willingness to do anything, say anything
to get back into the HOF regardless of what he hurts
or what he has to say to do it.
\_ some people just don't care about character. to
them there is nothing someone can do that is
'wrong' or immoral because they don't believe in
morality. anything that someone can get away
with is ok because they have no sense of right
and wrong. you're wasting your time trying to
explain immorality to someone that has no morals.
\_ you people are incredible. we just had a thread
about how EVIL teachers are bleeding the
taxpayer dry with their 30k/yr salaries for
teaching kids, but when it comes to baseball
teams
subsidised by the taxpayer for the profit
of a few millionares all you fuckers
care about is who gambled or cheated.
\_ 30k/year? Bullshit. In CA, try 50k for
passing the 10th grade level exam and 70-80k
for taking a few night or summer classes and
getting an "advanced" teaching credential or
"masters" in education from *any* third rate
school. You're so full of crap. You know
nothing about the teacher's union or
teaching. You're not even trolling anymore.
You're just spreading outright lies and
complete misinformation at best. Please
just go away.
\_ Is there anything more boring than baseball. I'd rather watch
grass grow.
\_ Yes, there is. It's called Cricket. |
| 5/17 |
|
| csua.org/u/5g1 -> redsox.bostonherald.com/otherMLB/otherMLB.bg?articleid=185 Dont bet on it: Ex-sidekick: Petes not telling all By Jack Sullivan Tuesday, January 6, 2004 P ete Roses former sidekick said yesterday the all-time Hit King is continuing to lie in his gambling confession by claiming he never bet on games from the Cincinnati Reds clubhouse. Yes, absolutely he bet from the clubhouse, said Tommy Gioiosa, a New Bedford native who met the disgraced All Star in 1978 and became Roses confidant, housemate and runner for bets for the next 10 years. Hed call Tigers manager Sparky Anderson, Dodgers manager Tommy Lasorda, asking about how their pitchers were, who was playing and stuff and then hed hang up, laughing like a kid, saying like, I got good information, said Gioiosa, who now lives in Florida. Rose, Major League Baseballs most prolific hitter with 4,256 hits, has finally confessed to betting on baseball nearly 14 years after the late Commissioner A. Bartlett Giamatti banished him for life for violating the games cardinal rule on gambling. Until now, Rose has maintained he never bet on baseball, but in his new book slated to be released Thursday and in an interview on ABC News Primetime Live scheduled to air the same day, he finally admits what nearly everyone suspected and the Dowd Report detailed in 1989. Finally the temptation got too strong, and during the 1987 season, I began betting regularly in the sport I knew best - baseball, he says in the book. I was betting on baseball while I was managing a Major League club during the regular season. In the book, Rose says he admitted his baseball gambling to Commissioner Bud Selig in hopes of having his lifetime banishment lifted and enabling him to be eligible for the Hall of Fame. But former Commissioner Fay Vincent, who oversaw the investigation into Roses gambling as deputy commissioner under Giamatti, said Roses mea culpa is half-hearted at best and is aimed at only maximizing the baseball outcasts earning power. Vincent is also miffed that Selig, who declined comment until the book is released, sat on Roses confession for more than a year and allowed Rose to maximize his book sales by releasing it the week that Hall of Fame inductees are announced. Gioiosa said he holds no animosity toward Rose, saying the singles king has an addiction that took hold and kept hold for a long time. Gioiosa said Rose never saw betting on baseball as cheating, adding the slap hitter also never saw putting cork in his bat near the end of his career as cheating either. |