Berkeley CSUA MOTD:Entry 11627
Berkeley CSUA MOTD
 
WIKI | FAQ | Tech FAQ
http://csua.com/feed/
2025/07/09 [General] UID:1000 Activity:popular
7/9     

2003/12/31 [Politics/Domestic/Election] UID:11627 Activity:nil
12/30   Special counsel to investigate Plame leak; Ashcroft recuses himself
        from the investigation.  I hear the other shoe dropping.
        http://msnbc.msn.com/Default.aspx?ID=3840566&p1=0
        \_ and if he didnt remove himself you'd be screaming he's hiding
           something.  it must be nice to think you're right and the other
           guy is the Devil no matter what he does.
           \_ He should have done it on day one, but better late
              than never. -!op
2025/07/09 [General] UID:1000 Activity:popular
7/9     

You may also be interested in these entries...
2007/9/13-14 [Politics/Domestic/President/Bush] UID:48049 Activity:very high
9/12    Actual history of the Patriot Act, for those who think that GWB
        had nothing to do with it:
        http://www.epic.org/privacy/terrorism/usapatriot
        "When the legislative proposals were introduced by the Bush
        administration in the aftermath of September 11th, Attorney General
        John Ashcroft gave Congress one week in which to pass the bill --
	...
2007/7/26-27 [Politics/Domestic/President/Bush, Politics/Domestic/Election] UID:47438 Activity:kinda low
7/26    Regarding the contradiction between Mueller and Gonzales.  The Bush
        admin's story is that there were two surveillance programs:  the
        #1 Terrorist Surveillance Program (TSP) and #2 an unnamed one.  Comey
        was going to resign over #2.  Mueller said Gonzales came to see
        Ashcroft for #2.  Gonzo said it was #2.  Dems think Gonzo said #1
        and Mueller said #2.  No one could talk about #2 clearly because
	...
2007/5/15-17 [Politics/Domestic/Election, Politics/Domestic/President/Bush] UID:46649 Activity:nil
5/15    White House attempted to get Gonzalez to authorize illegal
        spying program from his hospital bed:
        http://www.csua.org/u/ipb
        \_ You mean Ashcroft.
	...
2007/3/12-15 [Politics/Domestic/President/Bush] UID:45944 Activity:high
3/12    Alberto Gonzales and Pete Domenici, buh-bye
        http://www.talkingpointsmemo.com/archives/012983.php
           \_ Hi there.  So I guess every administration fires
           \_ It's not just the firing, it's the (ab)use of the Patriot Act
              to replace the fired attorneys with Bush-cronies without
              Senate approval.  But of course, no one in our government
	...
2006/8/3-6 [Politics/Domestic/Election, Politics/Domestic/President/Bush] UID:43886 Activity:nil
8/3     so, a while back, this collage pic of ashcroft was posted to motd:
        http://www.pmbrowser.info/hublog/images/gashcroft.jpg
        There was a similar one of Bush, only done with pictures of the
        faces of soldiers who had died fighting his wars.  anyone remember
        the URL for that one?
        \_ http://photomatt.net/2004/04/07/mosaic
	...
2005/9/15-17 [Politics/Domestic/President/Bush] UID:39698 Activity:kinda low
9/15    Reuter's Dan Rather moment?                             -jblack
        Reuters Photo Is A Fraud? matches neither Bush's or Condi's
        handwriting.  Reuter's admits to photoshoping.
        http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1485300/posts?page=1,50
        \_ The fact is, according to Reuters -- and this has not
           been widely reported -- President Bush did indeed take a
	...
2005/8/5-8 [Politics/Domestic/Election, Politics/Domestic/President/Bush] UID:39023 Activity:kinda low
8/5     Liberals: It's over.  We lost.  For real.  We're fucked.
        http://newsforreal.blogspot.com/2005/08/august-1-2005.html
        \_ He's got a few fallacies, but I think he's more or less
           correct.  The Democratic party has spent the last 5 years, at
           least, yelling about issues that no longer apply,  and
           re-hashing old battles that are long over.  I would love to see
	...
2005/7/12-14 [Politics/Domestic/Election] UID:38584 Activity:high
7/12    This isn't a Democrat vs. Republican issue. This is a
        we've-gone- through-a-wormhole-into-a-nightmare-alternative-universe
        -where-Greg Stillson-from-THE DEAD ZONE-got-elected-president-and-
        the-sound-of-demon-trumpets-are-cracking-the-horizon kinda thing.
        Republicans. I don't have any bad feelings for you as individuals
        or even as a group. The fact is, this time you guys fucked up.
	...
2005/7/1-5 [Politics/Domestic/Election, Politics/Domestic/President/Bush] UID:38388 Activity:moderate
7/1     http://csua.org/u/cki
        "Sandra Day O'Connor, the first woman on the Supreme Court, announced
        her retirement Friday."
        \_ Ok, someone had this scoop on the motd days ago.  How did that
           happen?
           \- Judicious Branch Prediction (SDO apparently let it slip before
	...
2005/6/24-27 [Politics/Domestic/Election] UID:38295 Activity:high
6/24    [from the thread way down below]
        \_ FWIW, I think this was John "I covered Lady Justice's Titties"
           Ashcroft's doing.
           \_ He might not have bothered if it weren't the case that so many
              photogrophers liked to snap pics of him with the titties in the
              background.
	...
Cache (2751 bytes)
msnbc.msn.com/Default.aspx?ID=3840566&p1=0
Legal experts said that while the signed forms would almost certainly have no legal standing, they could be used to push journalists, possibly under threat of subpoena, to disclose who was responsible for revealing the covert status of former CIA operative Valerie Plame. Plames husband, former Ambassador Joseph Wilson, has accused the White House of compromising his wifes job and safety in retaliation for his publicly disputing President Bushs claims that Iraq had tried to acquire nuclear weapons material in Africa. The claims, which Wilson investigated in Niger on a mission for the CIA, were part of Bushs case for war. Unusual tactic Justice Department officials told NBC News that the FBI could not conduct a thorough inquiry without being able to investigate the reporters involved in the leak, but legal experts said the request appeared to be unprecedented. Ive never heard of the government ever going to government employees and essentially demanding that they sign away whatever confidential arrangement with someone in the press, Floyd Abrams, a noted expert on First Amendment law, said in an interview Friday. Although law enforcement officials said asking the staffers to sign the form was a tactic that had been used in previous investigations of unauthorized leaks, they were unable to cite any examples when pressed by NBC News. Other experts said the form would most likely have no standing in court because judges have found that the reporter-source privilege belongs to the journalist and is not the sources to renounce. Nor would any reputable journalist be likely to comply anyway, they said. If a journalist is viewed by the public or their sources as knuckling under to pressure from the government, then theyre not going to be viewed as being an independent journalist for very long, Lucy Dalglish, executive director of the Reporters Committee for Freedom of the Press, said in an interview. Focus back on White House Attorney General John Ashcroft recused himself from the investigation last week, raising speculation that the Justice Department might be a focus of the probe. Fridays development indicated that the investigation remained zeroed in the White House, however. Fitzgerald, the United States attorney in Chicago, who was appointed as special counsel when Ashcroft stepped aside. Fitzgerald will have independent authority to direct the investigation without seeking approval from the top officials of the Justice Department. Fitzgerald, 41, was chief of the Justice Departments Organized Crime-Terrorism Unit before he was confirmed as United States attorney in Chicago in October 2001. The White House has ruled out any role by three top administration officials in the leak: political adviser Karl Rove;