11/10 http://csua.org/u/4y1
GO RALPH! GO! RALPH'04! Sock it to 'em baby! No Dean-lite!
\_ I guess you want more attacks on American soil.
\_ There's not a single bear in sight. The Bear Patrol is
working like a charm
\_ First of all, learn to shorten your URLs. I have done it for
you this time. Remember this in the future, it makes your
trolls slightly more credible.
\_ Sorry, but it's not a troll. 300,000 democrats crossed over and
y'all bitch out my guy for having the nerve to enter the race.
This is still a democratic republic the last i checked.
\_ So you think we're better off with Bush, huh?
\_ I think BushGore is the same person. If it can't be the
Real Thing then fuck it. I refuse to vote for the
alternate, not lesser, evil. It is exactly that sort of
non-thinking that gets us the same sort of loser in office
every 4 years.
\_ I agree! GO NADER GO! RALPH'04! -- conservative
\_ Well that's just dumb. Now, granted, Al Gore wasn't a
very good candidate. Lacked charisma. But it's pretty
obvious that he had differences from Bush. Even if they
said the same thing before the election, you could tell.
This is a democracy, yes. Which is why Nader cannot win,
he is simply too far left to appeal to enough people. He
wouldn't win the dem nomination either. So forget it.
\_ Your own words, "Even if they said the same thing
before the election, you could tell" [they were
different]. WTF? That's just plain stupid. GO
GREEN! We're taking the SF mayor and after the
governator fails we're taking CA and then the
country. The reason people don't vote Green is
because they believe they can't win, not because
they don't like Green politics, platforms and
Green philosophy. --Nader'04!
\_ hah, are you for real? what I meant was that even
if they might sound pretty similar in the useless
debates they had, they were different. Do you
really think that a Gore presidency would have
been no different? The electoral laws in this
country are set up for 2 parties. |