10/7 <DEAD>www.recallarnold.us<DEAD>
Collecting links to all the sites popping up all over the place
that are starting to push for The Next Logical Step. -alexf
\_ It would be political suicide for the Democrats to start a recall
on Arnold. Not only would it be difficult to get enough signatures,
but it would *never* pass the general vote and the party would be
*brutally* punished in 2004. As a conservative I can only hope that
the leftist go for it. They might as well just shoot themselves now
and save the rest of us the trouble of seeing suicide in slow
motion. *PLEASE* try to recall Arnold. I'd love to see the Dem
party implode and CA vote (R) in 2004. --Tom voter
\_ The recall is only a mockery of the political process when
the democrat gets recalled, eh?
\_ Uh- it's a mockery when you start the recall before the
person even takes office. The other guy had 5 years on
record leading to the steps.
\_ It's still a mockery. It's just tit for tat. What,
only Republicans get to take advantage of shit?
\_ What the guy above said. It's still very much a mockery.
But what would you rather have -- mockery or Ahnold
in office? And who do you think would be more likely
to actually push through legislation to kill this
recall loophole for good (that is, raise the 12% barrier
to something more respectable, etc)?
\_ Arnold got 47.7% (91% reporting) out of a field of
130. That's a landslide no matter how colored your
glasses are. If people don't vote, fuck em. They
don't count.
\_ The one thing you're missing: in a real democratic
election, Gray Davis would have been able to run.
How many people would've chosen Davis over Arnold?
(Let alone over Bustamante?)
\_ Don't kid yourself. Everyone understood that a
Yes on recall was a Yes on Arnold. Gray was
running against himself. If he can't win a
simple yes/no, he sure as hell can't win against
a human being.
\_ dumb fuck, a no on recall is a vote for Davis
to something more respectable, etc)? -alexf
\_ Ahnold in office. You people can't have it both ways.
Getting rid of a moron governor is a much better reason
to put up with 'mockery' (which is an odd way to define
the law of the land) than tit-for-tat which is just
petty. So either drop the mockery line or stand
above the gutter yourselves.
\_ It isn't a loophole. It's the law. Loophole doesn't
above the gutter yourselves.
mean what you think it means. |