| ||||||
| 2011/7/26-8/6 [Politics/Domestic/California, Politics/Domestic/Election] UID:54144 Activity:nil |
7/26 Oregon Congressman David Wu says he's resigning - Yahoo! News:
http://www.csua.org/u/tvq
"Democratic Rep. David Wu of Oregon has announced that he is resigning
in the wake of allegations that he had a sexual encounter with an
18-year-old woman."
Given that:
1. The Age of Consent in Oregon is 18,
2. He filed for separation from his wife two years ago,
why did he need to resign?
\_ You'll never get it.
\_ By hook or by crook we will.
\_ "allegations he engaged in 'aggressive and unwanted sexual
behavior' with a young woman."
http://www.csua.org/u/tvu (cbsnews)
\_ I see. I guess Yahoo News (Associated Press) didn't tell the
whole story. -- OP
\_ I know I am a sick puppy, but what exactly went on here?
I want details, the more lurid the better.
\_ "Amid the frenzy of arm-twisting, debate and reporters swarming
like bees in a sunflower garden, Representative David Wu, the
Oregon Democrat who resigned this week amid a sex scandal, sat
peacefully on the balcony off the speaker’s lobby, awaiting the
last votes of his career and pulling on a stogie."
http://is.gd/IMRgL9 [nytimes] |
| 2011/7/26-8/2 [Science/Physics] UID:54145 Activity:nil |
7/26 "Hong Kong scientists 'show time travel is impossible'"
http://www.csua.org/u/tvp (news.yahoo.com)
\_ Rest of World Emits Collective 'duh'
\_ I'm no physics wizard. They may have proven that a single photon
does not travel faster than c. But how does this imply that
no physical object can travel faster than c? And how does that
imply that no information can travel faster than c?
\_ tell that to the guys who had the "Time Machine Invented" article.
LESSON: you can't believe the internets for things outside the
scope of knowledge of the avg compunerd. Yes, high end physics,
much like economics, classics, lit theory, politics, and how to
talk to women, are all out of scope. |
| 2011/7/26-8/2 [Academia/Berkeley/CSUA/Motd] UID:54146 Activity:moderate |
7/26 motd: I'm back. what did i miss?
\_ Not much, how long were you gone?
\_ over the last ~7 years I've gone from checking many times
a day to checking once per year. where are the following
people? tom, psb, danh, kchang, mconst, jon, alexf, dbushong,
sky, kinney, ranga, paolo
\_ Who is this? I know where some of these people are, some
even still use soda occasionally. -ausman
\_ soo, people don't use motd tracking scripts anymore
to identify post authors? dang
\_ Hello. I'm the author of http://csua.com archiver. I haven't
used motd as my primary form of Q-and-A for many years because
I see social networking alternatives (e.g. Quora, Google Circle)
as [more refined] superset of motd. They are missing threading
and anon posting, but other than that, I don't see how motd
can be sustainable given the sharp decline of shell users. In
a way, motd is dead, but the spirit of motd lives on forever
in the form of social networking. -kchang
\_ but motd had value beyond and in a different way than, say,
google+ or other "social networking". we have to bring it
back from the dead. how?
\_ we "have to"? we "must"? why? -kchang
\_ because motd is unique and valuable and awesome and
it shouldn't die
\_ because the motd is (was) awesome
\_ How did it arise in the first place? If you can get users
to provide compelling content and then invite more people,
then you can get it going again. I find the motd to be a
useful diversion, the quality of the posts is pretty high
for a anonymous system and it is very easy to use from work.
So go invite some of the old users to come back again, do
you need help tracking them down?
\_ yes. bring them back. maybe we could try by insulting
tom or psb and bringing them back. although I
a problem i suspect is that the system seems pretty
slow and maybe not capable of handling many
simultaneous users or something?
\_ worksforme
\_ who is deleting this thread and why? |