2/14 You sure soda isn't running windows in disguise? It would explain the
uptimes.
\_ hardly, My winbox stays up longer.
\_ Nobody cares about uptime anymore brother, that's what web2.0 has
taught us. Everything is "stateless".
\_ You;d think gamers would care more about uptime.
\_ why do you think i suggested they run a private wow server
on the side, it would give them impetus to care about
stability
\_ Seriously?! Have you ever browsed web 2.0 sites without cookies?
\_ This ploy to confuse state-passed-into-client vs state-kept
-by-server in a discussion about _server_ issues has been
ignored. lern2troll plz.
\_ Seriously? You are confusing client and server?
\_ Soda is not the problem. NFS is. We mount NFS from an OpenSolaris
box hosting ZFS. We don't have the money to get a proper filer to
get stuff running smoothly, so we're thinking of moving user data
local to soda so that the NFS server, which is slightly incompatible
or something, and prone to shitting bricks, won't be such a problem.
However, the people capable of doing this, as well as the
possibility of downtime of services such as usenetwhich we provide
to the campus, means this'll have to happen at the end of the
semester (May/June). Also a problem is that the CSUA doesn't have
a whole lot of IPs, so we bottleneck through a server which will
cut off access to most other services if it goes down, as it uses pf
to direct traffic on certain ports to certain internal VMs with only
internal IPs. --toulouse
\_ OpenSolaris; is that in danger of going away? I thought oracle
end of life'd it?
\_ P.S. We care about the uptime that students and professors
rely on. Please don't paint us as being careless and incapable.
--toulouse
\_ I don't have OpenSolaris experience but I've used ZFS on FreeBSD
for a file server, and it's been very reliable. --jwm
\_ So did we. If you ever have heavy load under multiple users,
brace yourself for frequent kernel panics. Also, FreeBSD ZFS
is ages behind OpenSolaris's, though TBH with Oracle eating
Sun, added to our issues with our disk server's uptime,
OpenSolaris and ZFS as a whole aren't looking all that
attractive for continued use. --toulouse
\_ FreeBSD's ZFS does lag behind, but it's plenty functional
for what I've done. I can give up some of the new
functionality to have stability. --jwm
\_ No, no, what I was saying is that under load, FreeBSD's
crashed *a lot* when we were running NFS+ZFS on it.
Not that OpenSolaris has been a party either, but I
personally don't think that NFS+ZFS is a winning combo
for stability if you're looking for a free solution.
P.S. your tabs are wrong. Note the locations of tabs.
--toulouse
\_ If FreeBSD crashes that means you aren't running the
quality hardware.
\_ I doubt that. I don't remember the details but I
think this also happened in VMs? In any case, if
we could get good hardware a filer would be nice.
--toulouse
\_ Among other implementations (including
Netapp) I run NFS on a Thumper using ZFS
and it is very stable with 150 users who
are actuall doing things. I think
something is wrong with your hardware or
your config.
\_ That may very well be so. But the only one
who maintained our ZFS+NFS setup seriously
graduated a while ago, and there's not a
lot of interest in maintaining a finicky
setup in the absence of time and money,
when that time could be used more
effectively on class and other stuff. --t |