5/26 "China could join moves to sanction North Korea"
http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20100526/ap_on_re_as/as_clinton_south_korea
How did Hillary manage to do that when we're also asking China to
concede on the economic front at the same time?
\_ China doesn't want NK to implode. NK is a buffer between SK and
China, or in other words a large buffer between a strong US ally and
China. As a matter of national security, they don't want to see
Korea's unification happen, because it would put them in a situation
where US troops would be stationed at the border with China.
Furthermore, the occupation of NK by SK would likely result in a
large number of NK refugees in China, which, as an ally of NK, they
would be obligated to host, but which would cause socioeconomic
problems. It's in their interest for NK to remain as it is, a buffer
state between SK and China, even if that means cooperating with the
US for now; it serves their needs. The real danger is the
possibility of NK's internal power structure destabilizing and
causing unpredictable behavior. Until now, NK has managed to survive
by predictably backing off its threats when the US pays it money to
stop being a pain in the ass. Obama has broken this cycle of paying
off NK, which may be causing internal turmoil.
\_ Actually, SK has usually been the one paying off NK, not the US.
So, I would say Prez. Lee had more to do with this than Obama.
Especially since Bush was really the one that broke the cycle
by insisting on the 6-party talks. Bush wussed out a bit near
the end because he was desperate for a diplomatic victory. I'm
glad Obama has turned the pressure back up, but credit where
credit is due.
\_ It is called diplomacy. I know it has been a long time since we
had anything other than a bully and a moron as President, but
other tactics work better.
\_ facepalm.
\_ http://www.dkosopedia.com/wiki/Mission_Accomplished |