| ||||||
| 2009/5/2-6 [Computer/HW/Laptop, Computer/HW/Drives] UID:52933 Activity:kinda low |
5/2 I have a 1Gbps switch. It is connected to a SANS RAID-1 with
two WD Green 1T that takes 1Gbps connection, as well as a laptop
that is also 1Gbps. Online benchmarks show *sustained* transfer
rate of about 1/2 of 1Gbps with the WD Green... cool!!! But
in practice, I'm only getting 68Mbps (read SANS->PC file transfer),
far below what I expected. The switch says both devices are using
1Gbps. BTW, setting the SANS on Jumble Frame/no jumble doesn't
change the transfer rate at all. What's going on?
\_ Are you limited by your PC's drive speed? 68 Mbps is 8.5 MB/s
which may be all your drive can do. What do you get copying
data on your drive locally?
\_ When I copy a 796MB file from the same drive, it took about
a minute. So I figured... 796MB read and 796MB write (gross
56 sec. So I figured... 796MB read and 796MB write (gross
assumption that they're about the same, but false).
That's 796*2 / 60 = 26MB/sec. So I hardly think I'm limited
by my drive.
That's 796*2 / 56 = 28MB/sec. So I hardly think I'm limited
by my drive. I'm almost certain the bottleneck is due to
something stupid I did, but seriously, I checked that NAS
is in fact set to use 1000Mbps (or no connection), and I know
my laptop transfer speed is super fast at work. Reallly baffled...
my laptop transfer speed is super fast at work. Reallly
baffled...
\_ Your drive can't do any better than 224 Mbps. Less over
the network given the overhead. Figure maybe 0.66 of 224
for 135 Mbps. That's only a factor of two different from
what you are seeing. Maybe there is some caching going on
to give you that 2x. If the NAS is *really* capable of
500 Mbps (which is what my $100K Netapp striped across
many disks can do so it seems unlikely) then I'd look to
your drive or your network card. Could also be that your
switch sucks. Try to connect with a crossover cable to
see if that helps.
\_ What is the Sustained Transfer Rate for the disks in your NAS?
Odd are it is about 25MBps/per disk. How wide is your stripe?
http://www.storagereview.com/map/lm.cgi/str |
| 2009/5/2-6 [Uncategorized] UID:52934 Activity:nil |
5/2 So, what is bchoi actually?
\_ I think it is the beta version of achoi. |
| 2009/5/2-6 [Uncategorized] UID:52935 Activity:nil |
5/2 With all the old timers it feels like I'm back in college. -- jsjacob |
| 2009/5/2-6 [Computer/HW/CPU] UID:52936 Activity:nil |
5/2 why would my php application chew up 20-30 percent of my CPU when
run on a real machine, but will consitently take up 60-70 percent
of CPU when run in a vmware vm ?
\_ the real CPU has more capacity.
\_ Yes, did you allocate all of your CPU to the VM? Maybe you only
gave it one CPU or something like that.
\_ Overhead from VMWare using cycles. If you don't have vm extensions
for your CPU that's liable to make things slower too. |
| 2009/5/2-6 [Academia/Berkeley/CSUA/Motd, Finance/Investment] UID:52937 Activity:low |
5/2 What's up with this mailing list? Can't we do it like we did in the
90's and have discussions on MOTD and the wall?
\_ Speaking of the '90s, when can we start having '90s parties?
\_ http://www.myspace.com/debaser90s
Someone beat you to it.
\_ We should keep doing it in the facebook, with the twittering.
\_ It is INSSAAAAAANE. The mailing list activity is ridiculously
intrusive!
\_ You're ridiculously stupid. Unsubscribe or change it to digest and
stop your whining.
\_ You're ridiculously stupid. Unsubscribe or change it to digest
and stop your whining.
\_ you're a fucknut. i still have the right to complain about
the stupidity of the mailing list content/activity.
\_ I get way more email than you can possibly imagine. forward it
why? just curious. I _/
always wonder about statements
like this, and how much the
stater gets and why.
\_ I'm just making fun of Christine's
whining. Don't take me seriously.
all to Gmail, use a label for CSUA, deal with it. quit whining.
\_ See latest mail. I'm thinking of changing it to digest. That should help
those of you who are too lazy to change it yourself. --t |