| ||||||
| 2008/12/10-16 [Academia/Berkeley/CSUA, Academia/Berkeley/CSUA/Motd] UID:52219 Activity:high |
12/9 A new politburo has been elected. --t
\_ I'm glad at least you guys could fill all seven offices this time.
Its really a shame that the amendment failed, the politburo is
too heavyweight at 7 officers (some of whom are so superflous,
there is little need for them to give a crap). I wish you guys
had proposed the amendment in a way that might actually convince
some people rather than "hey, so we want to do this." -mrauser
\_ hey, is it kosher to top-post like this? anyways, I dunno, if we
have enough officers to fill the 7 spots (as we did), I'd rather
have the larger offices. Part of my consideration in voting
against (I was initially for) was that I wanted to pull some more
people in to the CSUA, and so we can rely on others if some of us
happen to be busy (especially since 3/7th of Politburo will be in
CS150). --t
\_ You have been here for a week, don't start becoming a format
nazi. I find it astounding that you voted down the amendment
seeing as I could not find a single place where you voiced
any dissenting opinion to it. Why didn't you voice your
concern instead of silently hoping for failure. The concern
you gave was the original reason for the amendment but it
completely failed. Do you not remember an entire semester
where steven held two offices because you couldnt find a
single person who could act as events director? The rationale
for the amendment is clear from your description. Right now
the "larger" offices are the offices taking up the majority
of the responsibility and work burden for the csua. The
amendment would have left you with positions with more
balance between them instead of the large disparity now. -mr
\_ I've been here for two weeks, at least. Also, I have no
obligation to email you when I change my opinion, but FYI
I did talk with other members of politburo about this,
outside of politburo. That I sent out the email surveying
possible candidates for each of the position should indicate
to you (after the fact) that it wasn't a sudden decision,
and (though it's also not something I'd email you about) I
CSUA members for intent to run should indicate to you
(after the fact) that it wasn't a sudden decision, and
(though it's also not something I'd email you about) I
okay'ed it with a few politburo members. And of course I
took into account Steven's dual-position. Do you think I'm
an idiot? To me, balance was not really the issue; if
anything the low-stress positions such as librarian and
secretary are IMO a good gateway for members to test how
much they want to involve themselves in managing CSUA
affairs. It's why I ran for secretary in the first place.
I could go on, but my lock time just expired. --t
\_ There are also plans for a forum to replace motd. Yah!
\_ No there aren't. There are plans to pilot a forum to see if any of
you crochety old folks can be arsed into using this newfangled web
technology to connect with undergrads. --t (president-elect)
\_ No there aren't. There are plans to pilot a forum to see if any
of you crochety old folks can be arsed into using this
newfangled web technology to connect with undergrads. --t
(president-elect)
\_ if there are gals as hot as karen@csua circa 2004-5 I'll
definitely donate and connect with you undergrads.
\_ Pics of karen please?
\_ karen likes fruits, but does she like gay people?
\_ Commence stalking now:
http://karenism.com/blog
\_ I'm in LOOOOOVE. Time to donate to the CSUA.
\_ She's taken.
\_ oh man, karen is really creative. impressive
\_ I thought Karen has big breasts. Guess not.
\_ http://xcf/~paolo/brc2004/3444600-R1-034-15A.jpg
\_ Blown out highlights in the back, typical when
you're trying to save details in front. Actually
I'm surprised to see how much shadow (subject)
was saved despite this high contrast scene.
Was a fill-in flash used in this situation?
What camera+flash if any was used here?
\_ She's VERY taken.
\_ I'm still going to jerk off to her pics.
\_ http://xcf/~paolo/brc2004/3444600-R1-034-15A.jpg
http://csua.org/u/91p
\_ I thought someone on motd once said Karen had big
breasts. I guess not.
\_ they're bigger than mine. certainly bigger
than typical Japanese and Taiwanese ones.
\_ I guess you could call that hot...
\_ oh boy, another web forum to ignore.
\_ just like motd
\_ Ummm, do you really want these guys connecting with the
undergrads? |
| 2008/12/10-16 [Computer/HW/CPU, Computer/HW/Drives] UID:52220 Activity:moderate |
12/9 Another idea for the CSUA that lets you spend money and maybe get some
cool toys. Instead of buying a beefy server (like say, a massive server
with 20 386DX processors), buy a few cheap machines (like the ones
mentioned below) that have good disks and work on failover / load
balancing. A netscaler or other piece of hardware is complete overkill,
but maybe hacking an OpenBSD box could do the trick. The idea is that
this project:
- Lets you learn a lot about failover/redundancy/scalability, which
are real-world, relevant skills and also interesting. The fake
CSUA head-hunter would be all over these real skills.
- Increases the reliability/performance of soda / csua machines.
- Gives a justification for buying new hardware.
- Give a cause for the CSUA.
Good idea: ..
Bad idea:
\_ 386DX is cool: http://csua.com/?entry=18447
\_ Too late, the server has already been ordered. We already have cheap
machines, and we're note exactly getting pounded on the web, nor do
we have sites to scale up. We already have stuff on FreeBSD as well
as backup LDAP. The point of failure is keg and the fact that we have
16 small disks. We've also ordered new disks to rectify that. I gat
16 small disks. We've also ordered new disks to rectify that. I got
the idea that you'd rather we work around a lack of resources than
exploit more than we think we need...or at least, that's what I keep
hearing. I don't think that's really going to help. --t
as backup LDAP. The point of failure is keg and the fact that we
have 16 small disks. We've also ordered new disks to rectify that.
I got the idea that you'd rather we work around a lack of resources
than exploit more than we think we need...or at least, that's what
I keep hearing. I don't think that's really going to help. --t
\_ Good decision. Especially good to just make a decision and
start fixing things, instead of debating endlessly.
\_ I like what you did more than my proposal! Stability, not speed,
should be the first factor. Good disks and stable builds are
two of the biggest contributors to stability. Do you still hit
up alums for donations? -op
\_ We were going to hit up alumni for donations for the server
before we got it, but the stability was (literally) getting us
down and so we decided to get the new server. Steven, last I
heard, plans on installing ESXi (the free one) on it setting
it up. It should be in place by mid-to-late-January, possibly
heard, plans on installing ESXi (the free one) on it setting it
up. It should be in place by mid-to-late-January, possibly
earlier. --t |
| 2008/12/10-16 [Consumer/Camera] UID:52221 Activity:moderate |
12/9 Hey how old do you think the girl is in the picture?
http://nikonclspracticalguide.blogspot.com/2008/01/nikon-flash-two-separate-metering.html
\_ Which one?
\_ Which one? Both are "too young for me"
\_ both, but the first one is cuter
\_ they both look mid-late teens to me, and I'd say the second
was cuter.
\_ teeage girls are cute.
\_ But we're bound to agree
on tautologies, like oxygen is necessary for living,
drinking water is good for you, literacy is good etc. |