|
2008/11/14-26 [Computer/SW/Languages/Java, Computer/SW/OS/Solaris] UID:51970 Activity:moderate |
11/13 http://sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/n/a/2008/11/14/financial/f051352S72.DTL http://preview.tinyurl.com/6nngpm Sun Microsystems Inc. plans to cut up to 6,000 jobs, or 18 percent of its global work force, as sales of its high-end computer servers have collapsed. The drastic move announced Friday highlights Sun's desperation to cut costs and survive as an independent company. Sun's shares have fallen so steeply they've crossed an ominous threshold, driving the company's market value below its cash on hand. That means investors believe the company itself is essentially worthless. lulz is this because of open source and linuz? \_ If Sun goes down, what happens to Mysql? \_ Who cares? \_ I care a little. You may mock Mysql, but it is used by freakin' everyone these days. \_ Someone will buy Sun. heck if they're worthless, maybe I can buy Sun. I've been refraining from double lattes. \_ Sun has become DEC. It was a sad day when Compaq bought DEC. It will be a sad day when Dell or its equivalent buys Sun. -ex-Sun \_ Is this because they opensources Solaris? How do opensource companies make money again? \_ it has nothing to do with Solaris being open. \_ I am a Sun guy. I guess I am on the software-side of the house, so things are not as bad as the headline says. \_ IBM could buy Sun right now outright, lay everyone off, keep the contracts, and pay for the acquisition with the cash inside of Sun. "lulz" \_ shut up paolo \_ Bush is responsible for state of current economy! Free Tibet \_ shut up emarkp \_ You forgot to add "Iraq War" and "lolz", troll. \_ I am a Sun guy. I guess I am on the software-side of the house, so things are not as bad as the headline says. \_ As a ex-Sun employee I am not surprised. Sun has been mismanaged for 10+ years, and is full of deadwood and useless middle managers. Even this job cut won't be enough for the company to survive. Pony tail boy needs to reduce the work force down to about 10K and put an end to the java religion w/in the company is to survive in the long run. \_ As a ex-Sun employee, I think there are many reasons for Sun's problems. Linux is one reason, at least in the workstation / low-end server market. Intel is another reason. Sparc is just not all that important anymore. But the two biggest reasons I think are: (1) extremely poor management; and (2) java. Management at the upper levels was always unwilling to see reality and did not make the cuts that were needed in the early part of this decade. If Sun had cut its staff to 10K-15K in 2002-2003, they would be reasonably well positioned today. Also, Sun has way too many middle managers and upper level technical deadwood (architects, sr. staff eng., &c.). This was a problem that management was also unwilling to correct. These people are the ones that foster the java-religion w/in the company. It doesn't matter how lousy a java project is, it will always be selected for funding over a non-java project. In fact, I saw profitable non-java projects cancelled in favor of incomplete and unreleasable java projects. The only reason for these cancellations was that the profitable projects weren't using java. \_ Religion? You mean cult. -I hate Java \_ http://finance.yahoo.com/q/bs?s=JAVA Cash on hand is 2B, market cap is 3B, so your first premise is incorrect. Also, what you should really be looking at is real tangable assets minus liabilities and that is even less, more like $1B. But JAVA really is cheap. \_ I disagree. Take a look at: http://finance.yahoo.com/q/is?s=JAVA http://finance.yahoo.com/q/is?s=JAVA&annual Maybe I am not reading this right, but it looks like Sun has lost about $1.3 billion to date this year, and lost $864 million in 2006. This trend is not new and reflects the unwillingness of Sun management to face the reality that fewer and fewer customers need sparc, java, zfs, &c. and that too many people are employed in developing things that no one wants to buy. - ex-Sun that no one wants to buy. -ex-Sun \_ Look at the cash flow chart: http://finance.yahoo.com/q/cf?s=JAVA&annual They had positive cash flow in both 2006 and 2007, and while 2008 cash flow is negative (through June), cash flow from operations was positive; the negative hit is on sale purchase of stock, which probably means they spent some cash to do a share buyback. (Which was probably a mistake, looking at the overall situation). In general, they're not bleeding money; they're just becoming less and less relevant. -tom \_ They are burning through $250M per quarter, which means they have a year left if things don't turn around quickly. \_ Actually, it looks they just need to stop buying their own stock. \_ Ponytail can do no wrong. Really does anyone take seriously a man in a ponytail? \_ My Little Pony |
2008/11/14-26 [Politics/Foreign/MiddleEast, Politics/Foreign/MiddleEast/Iraq] UID:51971 Activity:nil 75%like:51954 |
11/12 http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/africa/7650415.stm lulz, Pirates have spokesmen now? \_ we should Bailout the pirates |
2008/11/14-26 [Politics/Domestic/Election] UID:51972 Activity:nil 84%like:51944 |
11/12 lulz Shephard Smith learned something in school http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PHKzS5Zl6mY I wonder when he'll jump networks. \_ His comment about the media contradicts the media's statements about the media. http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/story/2008/11/09/ST2008110901017.html \_ Actually his comment is an answer to that. Obama got better media coverage because he was the better candidate for the time. |
2008/11/14-26 [Consumer/Camera] UID:51973 Activity:nil |
11/13 Camera nuts, may be you want a REAL camera that REAL man uses: http://xrl.in/128i \_ not funny. BZZZZZZ. \_ not funny. ZZZZZZzzzzzzzzzzzzzz. \_ "lulz" \_ Large CCD sensor, world's largest |
2008/11/14 [Politics/Domestic/California, Finance/Investment] UID:51974 Activity:nil 72%like:51977 |
11/14 http://delong.typepad.com/sdj/2008/11/worst-economic.html BDELONG thinks we're all gonna die. "lulz" |
2008/11/14-26 [Politics/Domestic/California] UID:51975 Activity:nil |
11/13 lulz Hey lulz guy, if you delete this one more time, I am going to start nuking the motd. -#1 lulz guy fan http://tinyurl.com/68g36c Complaint filed against Mormon church for lying about campaign contributions to Prop 8. \_ that is a gay blog \_ I hope you report on the result when this ridiculous case is thrown out. Any lawsuits against other groups? How about Rev. Wright's church? How about any church that has had candidates behind the pulpit? \_ lulz \_ Why would he? Let those with that interest post their own junk. No one's stopping them. |
2008/11/14 [Uncategorized] UID:51976 Activity:nil |
11/13 Deal lolz guy. Please don't forget to take your anti-depressant. |
2008/11/14-26 [Politics/Domestic/California, Finance/Investment] UID:51977 Activity:low 72%like:51974 72%like:52014 |
11/14 lulz http://delong.typepad.com/sdj/2008/11/worst-economic.html BDELONG thinks we're all gonna die. \_ lulz lulz lulz lulz lulz lulz lulz lulz \_ does this sequence converge? \_ That's a pretty terrifying chart \_ "worst downturn since the Great Depression" - duh? we're all gonna die / mad max? I don't see that. |
2008/11/14 [Uncategorized] UID:51978 Activity:moderate |
11/13 lulz LOL. LOL DUDE. \_ wtfstfu \_ WTFOMGBBQ \_ "BBQ"? |
2008/11/14-26 [Uncategorized] UID:51979 Activity:nil |
11/14 "Which Came First? Eggs Before Chickens, Scientists Now Say" http://www.csua.org/u/mxu (news.yahoo.com) http://images.teamsugar.com/files/users/1/13254/30_2007/eggdid.jpg |
2008/11/14-26 [Consumer/Audio] UID:51980 Activity:nil |
11/14 Economics textbook author/professor decries fallacy of expecting significant returns simply by holding equities for 30+ years link:tinyurl.com/6enshr (bloomberg.com MP3) Hedge fund manager Bill Ackman on Charlie Rose (haven't watched it yet, but I believe he says something like stocks are way undervalued) http://tinyurl.com/5mtfue (video.google.com) |
2008/11/14-26 [Consumer/CellPhone, Computer/Companies/Apple] UID:51981 Activity:nil |
11/14 Angry sysadmin gets iPhone stolen out of his hands while riding Muni, pummels thief, retrieves phone, gets back on train http://tinyurl.com/5poc89 (from http://valleywag.com) \_ huh i know that guy. he's a KALX dj. \_ Muni actually \_ oops, tnx |
2008/11/14-26 [Reference/Religion] UID:51982 Activity:nil |
11/14 Red State Mormons teaching their kids to hate: http://www.2news.tv/news/local/34274374.html \_ I missed the part that they're Mormon, where is it? \_ That's because it's not there. Op is a an idiot. Are you surprised? \_ http://tinyurl.com/66jxwk http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Madison_County,_Idaho "With a strongly conservative and Mormon population..." http://crooksandliars.com/node/24031/print "Roughly 90 percent of the population there is LDS." \_ The area is heavily LDS. The remaining population is heavily survivalist / white supremecist. \_ Op is an idiot. |
2008/11/14-26 [Finance/Investment] UID:51983 Activity:low |
11/14 Interesting stock trader psychology I noticed today. The markets were mixed and I was pulling for a huge $$$ day (as opposed to the so-so one I ended up with) but when it became clear that was not going to happen and the rally died then everyone just stopped buying, which led to the bloodbath at the close. If you just looked at the open and close you would think there was a crazy sell-off, but the reality is that most of the eventual losses were over the last 10-15 minutes when the bulls decided to call it a week and the shorts continued to sell. Given that I expect a rally on next week at some point, because "it was not as bad as it looked". That plus the G20 meeting over the weekend. Even though my positions are still positive (and I usually sell at the end of every day) I will hold them overnight. No point selling into the hands of the shorts and I'm still green on the day even after the sell off. \_ I enjoy reading your motd posts about day trading. Do you do this as a full time job? Or do you have your brokerage account web site open at work at all times? I don't have the world's most demanding job, but I would go insane doing my work and managing my account all day like you do. \_ All you have to do is watch a handful of stocks on a ticker. It's not much time at all. I get up before the markets open and see what's up. Then I go about my regular business until 8am or so when I check again. Between then and lunch I just glance at the ticker every few minutes and then at lunch time I really watch intently for a time to get out (if I haven't already and still have a position open). \_ Most day traders end up losing their shorts. \_ This can't be true, because for most of history the market has risen. A rising market erases a lot of mistakes. It's more challenging now than it typically is. If the market is up then you will be up even if your buy and sell signals are goofed and if the market is down then you will be down no matter what you do. \_ No, it is true. Volatility + leverage + frequent trading by an amature leads to most of the money ending up in the hands of the pros, over time. I can show you how this works, but I think you can figure it out for yourself pretty easily. If you have real talent at this, you should try to get a job with a brokerage and use OPM. But they aren't really hiring right now. \_ 1. No one said you need to use leverage. I think it would be foolish to even for buy-and-hold. I don't. 2. You have a point that transaction fees can eat up profits, but I don't pay any and "Lower profit because of fees and taxes" is not the same as "losing your shirt". It's just less profit (all else being equal) - during a rising market, of course. \_ How do you avoid commissions again? \_ Maintain a certain balance in my account \_ All right, both you guys put forth excellent reasons. Is there any data? \_ Yes, but nothing really great and it is contradictory. Part of the problem is defining what a "day trader" is. There are many strategies that involve buying and selling on the same day and many studies are not careful about differentiating. Someone making money on spreads and trading 400 times per day is doing something very different from a person range trading, for instance. Leverage plays a big part in it, too, because you can be wiped out very quickly if you buy $100K of stock with just $25K in your account if it goes against you. That's why I don't use leverage, although I do use margin for legal reasons. |
2008/11/14-26 [Recreation/Pets, Recreation/Humor] UID:51984 Activity:nil Cat_by:auto |
11/14 Alright enough of this economic meltdown we're gonna die crap. It's time to inject humor and entertainment into motd. Below is How to Tell if Your Cat is Plotting to Kill You. Funny shit if you love cats (or hate cats): http://www.catswhothrowupgrass.com/kill.php |
2008/11/14-26 [Finance/Banking, Politics/Domestic/Election] UID:51985 Activity:nil |
11/14 An overly long article directed to Obama on how he should fix the farm/food system. I actually agree with some of his points, but he does go little overboard toward the end. http://csua.org/u/mxv (NYTimes) \_ Forget the government, count on saving yourselves! This is a GREAT time for you savers to wait it out, and in a few years, everything will be super cheap and you'll buy properties and stocks that'll go up tremendously when Obama-socialism is over. This is the secret recipe that wealthy folks have used for ages. Of course, if you never had a lot of savings, then it's a different story. \_ savings? what is left will be taken by the government \_ Yes dear. That's nice. Now have some tea. \_ What does this have to do with the farm bill? \_ lulz |
2008/11/14-26 [Uncategorized] UID:51986 Activity:nil |
11/14 lulz I dreamed last night that as I got up, I had to select which kernel for my head to run that day at the grub prompt. I need a vacation. |
2008/11/14-26 [Computer/SW/WWW/Browsers] UID:51987 Activity:nil |
11/14 When does support for Firefox 2.0.0.x end? http://www.mozilla.com used to mention this, and I forgot what it said. |
2008/11/14-26 [Computer/Companies/Google] UID:51988 Activity:nil |
11/14 lulz motd google guys involved with google video chat, I am interested in knowing why you went with a browser plugin, instead of going with Flash... like every other vid conf guy on the internet. |
2008/11/14-26 [Computer/SW/OS/Linux, Computer/SW/OS/Solaris] UID:51989 Activity:moderate |
11/14 lulz why doesn't GOOG buy JAVA i mean SUN i mean whatever the hell they are these days. \_ Even GOOG isn't THAT stupid \_ Sorry, but WHY would Google do something like that? They run 99.2% Linux servers on the backend. They don't use Solaris for development. I mean, what does Sun have to offer to anyone these days? \_ ZFS, some SMP goodness, a quality OS, some neat stuff like containers, Java, and MySQL but I'll admit it's not much which is why the price is where it is. Sun has more to offer than Apple does in terms of technology, but can't seem to connect with users the way Apple does. \_ Apple is a consumer electronics company, not a technology company. Sun's "quality" OS is being phased out virtually everywhere it's implemented. -tom \_ It is true that Solaris is dying, but it is not because it is inferior. \_ So? It's proprietary, it's slow-moving, it's expensive. If they'd community-sourced it 10 years ago it might have beat out Linux, but at this point it's dead. -tom \_ It's not proprietary nor expensive. I'm not sure what slow-moving means in this context. \_ It's not proprietary? I can release "Tom's Kewl Solaris Distribution," and mirror all the patches Sun puts out? Don't think so. Slow-moving means it's slow to support new hardware, it's slow to get vendor support for commercial/propietary applications, it has poor support from most open source packages as well. -tom \_ People do that with Redhat all the time. \_ Google is fundamentally an advertisement company. Sun is a computer hardware company. What kind of "synergy" you are thinking again? \_ I would say Sun is a software company at this point. \_ I work at the software side of Sun. and don't I wish Sun is a software company. But consider that almost 90% of the revenue is coming from hardware sales, I would consider it is still a hardware company more than anything else. \_ And yet it's not, because SPARC is all-but-dead. The only value-added Sun has is in software. They better figure that out right quick. \_ This is similar to the problem Apple faced in the mid 90s. People were saying they needed to license the OS to grow the market share for the platform, but 80%+ of company revenues were from hardware. They licensed the OS, got taken to the cleaners by clone makers, and tanked badly while failing to grow market share. Jobs came in and focused the company on hardware, found an effective niche and has been quite successful. If Sun were to transition from being a hardware company to being a software company, they'd have to be prepared to cut 50%+ of their workforce, and make a strong case for why the new software company is something that businesses should be investing in, which will be difficult since businesses are currently deciding to get rid of Sun software. Sun actually has some decent commodity Intel servers these days, but that's not going to save them. -tom |
2008/11/14-26 [Politics/Domestic/Election] UID:51990 Activity:nil |
11/14 Obama faces more threats than any other president-elect http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20081114/ap_on_el_pr/obama_threats \_ The 9-per-centers have really lost it. \_ Obviously. There are a lot of KKK and closet racists out there. |
2008/11/14-26 [Uncategorized] UID:51991 Activity:low |
11/14 Sitting here in these chairs that I'm going to be proposing but in working with these governors who again on the front lines are forced to and it's our privileged obligation to find solutions to the \_ Not interested in defending the dude. Just saying that he probably didn't run because he hadn't planned it out that far. challenges facing our own states every day being held accountable, not being just one of many just casting votes or voting present every once in a while, we don't get away with that. \_ I can have a normal sentence go through Google translation to another language and back, and it'd still make more sense than that. \_ Palin 2012! \_ Maybe she's not a native speaker. Clarence Thomas likes to claim he's not a native English speaker, which I think it a bunch of crap. |
4/15 |