|
2008/10/17 [Politics/Domestic/California, Reference/Law/Court] UID:51556 Activity:moderate |
10/16 ACORN really is the biggest threat to democracy? Holy shit. Who knew get out the vote drives were so dangerous. \_ Uh, didn't know it was "the biggest". You might want to check out the situation in Ohio though. \_ "We need to know the full extent of Sen. Obama's relationship with ACORN, who is now on the verge of maybe perpetrating one of the greatest frauds in voter history in this country, maybe destroying the fabric of democracy." The fact the McCain is morally bankrupt enough to say this in a debate is just... well.. wow. \_ The GOP is playing a very dangerous game here, by threatening violence if they lose. They could really end up in a very big hole for a very long time if they follow through on that threat. \_ What, where the supreme court agreed that the voter \_ What, where the supreme court unanimously agreed that the voter \_ What, where the supreme court unanimously agreed that voter disenfranchisment is not a valid campagin tactic? |
2008/10/17-20 [Finance/Investment] UID:51557 Activity:nil |
10/16 http://www.dnaindia.com/report.asp?newsid=1198779&pageid=0 Okay, here's one emerging mkts article. I'm not offering it to support my case--just take it as a data point. \_ There is no evidence of leverage here, just a flight to quality, which is occuring in markets worldwide. |
2008/10/17 [Politics/Domestic/RepublicanMedia] UID:51558 Activity:nil |
10/16 Glenn Becks to join Fox News. Bahahahahahahahaha it's about time. The guy's fucking annoying on CNN. \_ As bad as he is, he still won't pull down the average IQ at Faux News. Damn he's a moron, of the Palin level grade. |
2008/10/17-22 [Finance/Investment] UID:51559 Activity:kinda low |
10/22 How many people here still day trade (compared to the dot-com days when almost everyone played)? \_ it's too dangerous right now. \_ looks like only Thu was an OpEx up day - but expectation was met \_ Dude, I just *started* day trading. It's an awesome environment to trade in. These wild, crazy swings up and down are great for trading! I can make $1000/day easy. I can see why some people get overconfident and quit their day jobs. I'm just enjoying it while it lasts. \_ What are you betting on these days? I'm too chicken so I only do QQQQ and DIA and I'm actually doing OK with the predictable fluctuations. In addition I'm trading such low volume that if I get screwed, I'll just hold on for 5-20 years and will still be ok. \_ Just close out your position at the end of each day and you'll never be screwed. I place stops to limit losses. The bad part is that I miss big gaps up at open. The good part is that I miss big gaps down at open. \_ But you end up paying transaction fees. \_ 1. I get free trades through my broker. 2. Even if I didn't, you think I am going to sweat a $20 fee to make $1000+? It's not as many trades as you think. 2-4 per day is all I need. You can keep changing the stops and limits all you want and it's still the same "trade" if it doesn't execute. \_ Doesn't the capital gains tax make your gains go away for the most part? \_ No more than it does for other income. |
2008/10/17-20 [Politics/Domestic/Election] UID:51560 Activity:nil |
10/17 Trader on Intrade was artificially boosting John McCain's contract value http://www.cqpolitics.com/wmspage.cfm?docID=news-000002976265&referrer=js \_ You mean a Republican was trying to manipulate the election? Say it isn't so Joe! |
2008/10/17-20 [Finance/Investment] UID:51561 Activity:nil |
10/17 Buffet: Buy stocks now you fucks </troll> \_ http://www.nytimes.com/2008/10/17/opinion/17buffett.html \_ I was about to post this as well. "I've been buying American stocks. This is my personal account I'm talking about, in which I previously owned nothing but United States government bonds. (This description leaves aside my Berkshire Hathaway holdings, which are all committed to philanthropy.) If prices keep looking attractive, my non-Berkshire net worth will soon be 100 percent in United States equities." |
2008/10/17-20 [Consumer/Camera] UID:51562 Activity:nil |
10/16 I bought a 18-200mm DX Nikkor a while ago but after reading the posts below I have a lot of regrets. I already registered with Nikon. Can I still sell it on eBay for a good price, since the warranty is *not* transferable? \_ What do you expect from a lens with 11X zoom range? I once compared my friend's 18-200 DX with my 18-70 DX by shooting the same scene with the same settings on my D80 body. My 18-70 yielded slightly sharper pictures. I imagine a prime will do even better. \_ So, you're saying that you had no regrets until you read the posts here? Then what's the problem? Go out, take pictures, enjoy it. No one should be expecting a consumer-level lens with 11x zoom range to match a high-end primes in contrast, color, and other qualities, but it's still going to take good pictures (if used right) while giving the you the flexibility of the 11x zoom. Even in the worst case, it's going to give you much better image than those little cameras with puny sensors can. \_ I recommend you get the 14-24mm f/2.8 and 24-70mm f/2.8. These two are the most amazing lenses I've ever had with amazing contrast, sharpness, and bokeh. Sell your consumer grade DX lens and take it as a hard lesson learned. Oh and buy a couple of SB-800 (or more 600s) so you can do really creative shots in almost any light conditions. |
2008/10/17-20 [Recreation/Shopping] UID:51563 Activity:nil |
10/17 Mervyns announces liquidation of store inventory and closing down of all of its stores \_ I'm a man. Most motd surfers are men. And we care about Mervyns because... ? \_ Because most geeks shop at Sears, K-mart, and Mervyn's for clothes and not Armani, Zegna, and Bloomingdale's. \_ I get my clothes from Old Navy and http://Amazon.com \_ I shop at Banana Republic (sales rack) and Nordstrom's rack. But I am a manager so perhaps not a true geek anymore. |
2008/10/17 [Politics/Domestic/Election] UID:51564 Activity:nil |
10/17 http://www.mcclatchydc.com/310/story/54360.html McCain decides to vilify ACORN as the worst thing since Hitler and funny enough his supporters take him to heart and act on the belief. Where's the McCain isn't responsible for his actions guy when you need him? |
2008/10/17 [Uncategorized] UID:51565 Activity:low |
10/17 Ok. I'm here now. Where's the party at? \_ what party? |
2008/10/17-23 [Reference/Tax] UID:51566 Activity:nil |
10/17 Is corporate tax (tax for corporations) progressive? Does the rate encourage mom&pop shops, or is it equal regardless of corporation revenues? Shouldn't it encourage mom&pop shops more? \_ In CA at least, a small company is an S-Corp. Partners in the company divide the net revenue based on percentage ownership and then add that to their other income. This is the most common form of small company, so the rates are the same as personal (and hence just as progressive). \- the majority of corporations doing business in the US dont pay any corporate taxes, so there is a large diff between the de jure and de fact (effective) tax rates. you can google for the GAO and de facto (effective) tax rates. you can google for the GAO study on this which came out this summer. --psb \_ url? \_ Exxon paid $30B in 2007. http://seekingalpha.com/article/63131-exxon-s-2007-tax-bill-30-billion \- company's total tax liability != us corporate taxes. i believe we are implicitly talkiing about us payments. |
2008/10/17-20 [Finance/Investment] UID:51567 Activity:nil |
10/17 Up up and away: http://www.theatlantic.com/issues/99sep/9909dow.htm |
2008/10/17-21 [Politics/Domestic/Election] UID:51568 Activity:nil |
10/17 McCain hired same robo-call slime firm to attack Obama as attacked him in 2000: http://tpmelectioncentral.talkingpointsmemo.com/2008/10/did_mccain_hire_same_firm_to_d.php |
2008/10/17-22 [Science/Disaster] UID:51569 Activity:kinda low |
10/17 http://tinyurl.com/55qdqa Article speculating that "oil bubble" was caused by hedge funds and that oil prices are down now because hedge funds have had massive redemptions. Where are the peak oil weenies now? Oil -> $50. \_ What are you, twelve? A drop in price is an opportunity to fix our oil dependency once and for all. \_ Peak Oil is not a matter of it, just when. As I said before, oil prices are very inelestic and since demand is down, prices should be way down. They will be back up again soon enough, take advantage of the respite to save. \_ Uh huh. Obviously oil prices are not that inelastic, because they've fallen like a stone. \_ Inelastic does not mean what you think it means. Oil consumption in the US is expected to decline, in spite of the fact that prices are down. Worldwide demand is still going to go up, just less than before. \_ So worldwide demand is going up, but prices are falling like a stone. Please start making sense. \_ Go read an econ textbook or something. Elastic == price and demand are tightly correlated. Inelastic == demand stays constant (relatively) no matter what happens to price. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Price_elasticity_of_demand http://tinyurl.com/634txb (this is better actually) \_ I've taken more econ. than you have I bet. Please to be explaining why the price of oil is falling. If demand is constant no matter what then what incentive is there for the price to fall? \_ Hmm, let me think, it is called a supply/demand curve. I wonder what variable other than demand could be in play here... \_ You think supplies are increasing that much, huh? Kinda blows away the idea that we are close to peak oil, wot wot? 2008 production is 1-2% higher than last year: we are close to peak oil, wot wot? (2008 production is 1-2% higher than last year: http://tinyurl.com/yprlk . Clearly that's enough to cause the price to fall in half. WTF do you think these curves look like? No, the issue here is with the demand side: specifically, speculators. \_ I think it is pretty obvious what the curves look like and that you are in denial about it. A very small increase or decrease in production over demand has a huge impact on prices. No one (or no reasonable person, at least) would claim that the "Peak" event will happen all at once. There is always going to be small movement up and down, as global events influence production. Also, as prices go up, new sources become economically recoverable. You should consider the strengthening dollar in your analaysis of how much prices have moved. Priced in Yen or Euro's, oil prices have moved quite a bit less. Don't mistake dollar volatility for commodity price volitility. \_ http://www.guardian.co.uk/business/feedarticle/7875749 The IEA still believes crude consumption will be higher than in the same period last year (+400,000 bpd) \_ sure, lots of levered long plays on oil by all sorts of funds (hedge, pension, other institutionals). with global slowdown, everyone ran for the exits. this is common knowledge for many traders. those evil speculaterss!!1 \_ I hope they're topping off the Strategic Petroleum Reserve. \_ Peak oil isn't scheduled to arrive until around 2010-2012 -- I said multiple times only a global recession could drive down prices which is exactly what is happening. Since the market is projecting a global economic contraction, demand will be reduced so prices go down. This all has nothing to do with peak oil, which is about the peak in oil *SUPPLY*. \_ Peak oil weenies claimed that the reason prices were so high was because the world was going to run out by 2020 or something. That was fear mongering. There's so much supply that OPEC is talking about reducing output. The current price is a good indicator that we're not close to peak oil yet. You don't go from "plentiful oil" to "peak oil" in 2 years (or whatever it was), sorry. \_ Peak oil specifically says the second 1/2 of the world's total usable oil will be so expensive to extract that it'll cost MORE to extract with current technology than to sell the oil, hence no one will extract it anymore. \_ Okay. And what evidence is there we are at the halfway point? \_ If the definition of "plentiful oil" is "more than demand" then indeed it's easy to do that. Oil supply has been flat for about 3 years now, and there is no proof that it's going to go up anytime soon. \_ Supply is going to (roughly) match demand. When you can say there's a problem is when supply cannot be met. One indicator of that is when production decreases even as prices rise. Clearly, we are not there yet. \- A good (non-ideological) question is "why do oil prices have so much more volatility than the instability of supply and demand". the simple answer is the prices are also a function of changing information/expectation *and* given a production cartel and other influential players with "market power" [to abuse that term a bit]. so in addition to speculators, there is strategic production strategy. it's not reasonable to write another 1000 words on this and frankly i dont understand it that well, but there more to it than supply and demand and elasticity. You may also want to look up Contango and Backwardation. Per my earlier link about manipulation in the copper mkt, the way these mkts work is very far removed from theory ... i.e. there is no simple answer. [if you are familar with economics, part of thinking about this involves the "art" of teasing out short run phenomena from long run equillibria. for an analogy in FX, say DORNBUSCH OVERSHOOTING vs convergence to PPP "eventually"]. |
2008/10/17-20 [Uncategorized] UID:51570 Activity:low |
10/17 Does anyone actually own Berkshire Hathaway Inc shares? \_ No. No one does. \_ I own some BRK-B \_ You must be wealthy. Do you own over 10 stocks? \_ BRK-B is only $4000. \_ If I had 10 shares of that I'd be rich -grad student \_ Sites like sharebuilder let you buy partial shares. |
2008/10/17-21 [Finance/Investment] UID:51571 Activity:kinda low |
10/17 http://www.chicagobusiness.com/cgi-bin/news.pl?id=31449 44-year-old veteran trader kills self after losing several million daytrading S&P 500 futures on Wed. \_ And we should pity gamblers because ...... \_ Because he worked very hard like many Americans do. \_ Most Americans don't live on gambling. \_ What's fundamentally different between a Math PhD at Goldman Sachs doing numerical analysis to beat the market vs. a stock broker who uses his superior understanding of psychology to beat the market? \_ Neither of them are doing anything particularly useful, so no, not fundamendally different. \_ who says we are pitying da foo'? \- nouriel roubini has killed himself: http://gawker.com/5064429/nick-denton-is-an-anti+semite-with-a-nazi-mind |
4/13 |