|
2008/10/3-9 [Politics/Domestic/President/Reagan] UID:51360 Activity:nil |
10/3 Palin blatantly misappropriates Reagan quote: http://krugman.blogs.nytimes.com/2008/10/03/raising-the-white-flag-of-surrender-to-medicare |
2008/10/3-7 [Politics/Domestic/Election] UID:51361 Activity:nil |
10/3 I'm fucking sick of politicians who think truthiness beats truth. http://www.washingtonmonthly.com/archives/individual/2008_10/015014.php \_ You could have stopped before "who" \_ Yes, but then it would have been a noisy snide comment instead of an actual expression of disgust. -!op |
2008/10/3-6 [Computer/Companies/Ebay] UID:51362 Activity:low |
10/3 Question about eBay. Say there are two accounts (A and B) bidding on one item. Starting price is $10, and A bids $50. Then B bids $55. The price is so high, no one else bids on the item. Then for some reason A retracts the bid. Does the bid go back to $10? \_ I don't think you can retract a bid that isn't winning the item. And there are lots of auctions that work like ebay does. Google "dutch auction." That pretty much works the same way. Everyone says the max they are willing to pay and the high bidder gets the item for the next higer bidder + 1. \_ Why would it when there is a bid at $55? \_ Because eBay bidding system works differently than any auction known to mankind. If you bid $55 when someone else bids at $50, then eBay says "ok you can get the item at $50+($1 increment)", and you walk away with the item at $51. eBay bidding says "the amount you put in is the highest you're willing to pay, but the actual price is the second highest bidder plus increment." \_ I'd imagine this system is for cutting down site traffic by bidders who would otherwise need to constantly check if they have been outbid. |
2008/10/3-6 [Finance/Banking, Finance/Investment] UID:51363 Activity:nil |
10/3 House passes bailout by significant margin. Guys, THINK about your long-term equity investments. You'll have PLENTY of people to blame in the near future, but where will your money have gone? Please consider the advice of a professional financial advisor, too, but in the end, it's YOUR MONEY. Practical advice: If you're not sure, move part into safety. \_ Coherence isn't your strong point is it? \_ WHAT is your problem dude? \_ At 3% CD rates, subtracting taxes and inflation, you are losing about 2%/yr with your cash position. This is a guaranteed way to end up poor in your old age. Is that what you want? I have gone from 0->$1M in 10 years, how have you done? \_ Past performance is not a predictor of future results. The specific reasons why have been what all my posts for the last two months have been about. I won't argue with you if you are confident in what you're doing. Good luck. I sincerely hope you do well in your investments. \_ Good luck to you, too. I think you should spend some more time thinking about how to hedge against what imho is the inevitable dollar devaluation to come. Sitting in Treasuries is not going to cut it. \_ thanks. fyi, that's exactly what I'm working on. \_ I am buying lots of TIPS and have for a while now. If the dollar falls then inflation should rise. \_ This is not a bad call, but I assume you know about the "upfront tax" costs of a TIP. This is not an issue in a IRA. |
2008/10/3-6 [Uncategorized] UID:51364 Activity:nil |
10/3 I'm old and know a little French and Spanish. How hard would it be for me to learn Russian? \_ russian is notoriously hard. you may enjoy learning "mat". \_ The answer really depends on your MOTIVATION. What is the primary reason for learning Russian? Business? Love? Traveling? \_ I think the US is going to collapse financially. At least I won't freeze to death in Russia if they have all the oil and natural gas. \- recommend you learn "mat". ok spasibo. \_ Russia is one of the worst escape plans I've heard of. Why not just go whole hog and plan to move to Darfur? \_ There are no hot Russian girls in Darfur. \_ Brazil dude. If you know Spanish, Portuguese is pretty easy to pick up and Rio is much nicer than Siberia. |
2008/10/3-6 [Science/GlobalWarming] UID:51365 Activity:nil |
10/3 "Russia to deploy new nuclear missile" http://news.yahoo.com/s/nm/20081002/wl_nm/us_russia_forces \_ This is, paradoxically, the best news I've heard from Russia in a long while. Why did the USSR fail? Because it spent all of its money on military build-up. God, I hope this causes Putin to get ousted. |
2008/10/3-4 [Uncategorized] UID:51366 Activity:nil |
10/3 Beyonce Knowles is SO )(#*$)*#)$#(* HOT HOT HOT |
2008/10/3-6 [Industry/Startup, Finance/Investment] UID:51367 Activity:nil |
10/3 Stock tip 2: Lifetime of this pump will be much more short lived than people might expect. (I.e., do not go all in long, although you could do so if you put in some stops--but that isn't long, is it? times like this are where the phrase "don't try to time the market" originate from) \_ Stock tip A: VIX levels like this are only seen at the top or the bottom of the market. We know we are not at the top, so... \_ Stock tip mu: Ignore stock advice based on technical factors given by random hosers. \_ VIX is a measure of put and call options based on volume and difference from fair value. Notice how shorts are prohibited for about a 1,000 stocks? They're all in options now. Stock tip mu guy is right--you'd be hosed if you didn't understand this. -op \_ VIX has nothing to do with "fair value" whatever that means: http://preview.tinyurl.com/4exdqx \_ http://www.investopedia.com/terms/f/fairvalue.asp ok, probably the wrong term, but let's just say, "the current market price of the underlying" \_ Lifetime of the pump after House passage was assured: 0 minutes. -op |
2008/10/3-4 [Uncategorized] UID:51368 Activity:nil |
10/3 WFC to buy WB: http://preview.tinyurl.com/4nkovj |
2008/10/3-6 [Politics/Domestic/Election] UID:51369 Activity:nil |
10/3 I would say that if anyone patronized anyone, Palin patronized Biden. "There you go again!" "You washington folk don't know what it's like." And that sort of stuff. Perhaps my partisanship is showing? \_ After the debate, I felt good. I know Obama is the winning ticket. I love Obama, and I'M READY FOR SOCIALISM. Fuck y'all capitalists. SOCIALISM NOW!!! \_ No, you are right, she did. What do you expect? When she tried to actually say anything of substance she showed how empty her understanding of the issues was so she had to go on the attack. \_ But 80% of the people in oh-so-white Valencia, CA thought she won. The rest were undecided or didn't care. \_ CA voters don't matter. What matters is how Palin did in suburban Denver or Alexandria, VA. \_ Biden followed proper vp debate procedure and basically ignored Palin, and only attacked McCain and promoted Obama. I don't know if that convinced any independent voters though. \_ According to polls it did. |
2008/10/3-6 [Uncategorized] UID:51370 Activity:nil |
10/3 Short ban to expire Wed night 11:59pm (I believe), after Dubya signed the bailout. If I were a criminal, I'd let the shorts get positioned, and create the biggest short squeeze imaginable. \_ How could you manage that, unless you were Paulson or something? \_ or Bernanke, or Cox |
2008/10/3-6 [Uncategorized] UID:51371 Activity:nil |
10/3 Keep on eye on VIX: http://www.istockanalyst.com/article/viewarticle+articleid_2397461.html \_ translation: people are buying a whole lot of out-of-the-money options as insurance, to front-run a move, or both |
2008/10/3-9 [Politics/Domestic/Election] UID:51372 Activity:nil |
10/3 I know why McCain doesn't ever look at Obama. I know why McCain loathes Obama. To McCain, Obama is a civee. Obama smokes dope. Obama is a self absorbed smartie pants who never bled, never served. \_ And Thank God we have a system where we have Civilian rule, not military rule. \- then he should hate BUSH 10x [the warrior poseur] and CHENEYCO [chickenhawks] 100x as much. \_ Please don't bring reason into this. \_ He probably does, he is just better at hiding it. \_ Rolling Stone has a pretty long detailed extensive article about his military service. It's also really mean. Not sure what to think of it. http://rollingstone.com/news/story/23316912/makebelieve_maverick \_ I actually don't know of any conservative that reads Rolling Stone. \_ I completely agree. The article is pretty detailed. I had no idea McCain has crashed so many planes. The LA Times had a similar article: http://tinyurl.com/3jyu4c \_ I don't know anyone under 40 that reads Rolling Stone. |
2008/10/3-6 [Consumer/Camera] UID:51373 Activity:nil |
10/3 Dear photo buffs. Now that full frame FX cameras are getting into the low $2000 range, and possibly much lower in a few years, do you think DX 1.3 1.5 1.6 smaller frame DSLR cameras will be obviated in the future? What is your prediction? \_ the race for megapixel is dead. Small frame DSLR is good enough and it'll be around for a very long time. \_ I don't see full-frame as really providing much value. Canon in particular is highly dedicated to APS-C frame size, and gets results which make going any larger seem unnecessary. -tom \_ Canon chose to never go back to full frame size. Their EF-S lenses do not physically fit into their full frame bodies. On the other hand, Nikon is waivering, undecided. Their DX lenses all fit into FX bodies, and their FX bodies recognize FX and crop accordingly. Canon=Republican, Nikon=Democrats (their lenses and bodies all get along). Canon is firm and takes better pictures. Nikon is queer and their indecisiveness make them look like pussies. \- it has implcations for noise, lens design and few other things, just as canon's decision to change the lens mount to a larger diameter. \_ The reality is that noise is becoming less and less of an issue. Even at ISO 1600 in low light my XSi displays astonishingly little noise. Sure, there are implications for lens design, but 35mm is an arbitrary size and there doesn't seem to be much marginal value in pegging digital to that size, particularly for Canon whose lenses are aimed at APS-C. If Nikon is costing more and not producing signficantly better results with 35mm sensors, the invisible hand will smack them down to size. so to speak. -tom \- look for serious photographers, there are more issues. (not suggesting i'm in that category) quality at 1600 is certainly better than it used to be, but i still dont like it, but different things work for different people, when you get to "qualitative" stuff like this. on the other hand there are plenty of technical difference, e.g. the DoF performance when shooting portraits with a 105/2.8 on 35mm vs APC. i think you would need something like a 80/2.0 for similar effect. i assume the yields will improve and he total fraction of cost in the sensor will come down, and the real estate will be good for high end cameras. but i agree for "regular" photographers [i.e. people usually not to "focused" on photographers [i.e. people usually not too "focused" on DoF], things like weight and cost and some features like IS trump extreme quality, MTF curves and corner cases. BTW, there are definitely places i've taken my <$1000 camera body i would not take a multi-$k body [risk of damage, theft etc] ... so in once sense i was able to take better pix with a lighter, cheaper camera. |
2008/10/3-4 [Uncategorized] UID:51374 Activity:nil |
10/3 I don't really understand why the Ted Stevens quote about the Internet being a series of tubes is considered so mock worthy. It's not a bad metaphore. \_ I think a large part of it was the delivery. It didn't sound like he was talking metaphorically. |
2008/10/3-6 [Politics/Domestic/California] UID:51375 Activity:nil |
10/3 Hypothetical moral question: if you know someone who has the opposite political stance as you but know that the person isn't sure whether he/she wants to vote, would you: 1) encourage that person to vote because it's in the American spirit to vote? 2) don't bother that person to vote because he/she will nullify your vote. Please explain your answers. \_ I think everyone should vote who's paying attention. There's something to be said for the wisdom of democaracy, but I think something to be said for the wisdom of democracy, but I think that breaks down if the voter isn't paying attention. \- 1. i dont think this is a moral question typically 2. not voting is a form of voting. longer answer: if you are persuaded the way you are voting is "moral" and the other party is not ... like say they believe in torturing people ... the moral act is to try to persuade them to do the "right thing". now in some cases it's reasonable to agree to disagree or the other party may reasonably have different interest from you. i think discussing issues matters more than voting. but to answer your question directly, #2. --non-voter. \_ Cast an additional vote on their behalf for your candidate. -rdaley \_ It doesn't matter. -DIEBOLD |
2008/10/3-6 [Uncategorized] UID:51376 Activity:nil |
10/3 Wow, Cramer is telling people to sell any pop wtf \_ Sounds like good advice. \_ What's pop? \_ significant increase in stock price \_ Cramer is the perfect contra-indicator. \_ oh, nevermind, apparently he's been doing it for a couple weeks -op |
2008/10/3-6 [Politics/Domestic/Election] UID:51377 Activity:nil |
10/3 McCain knows Latin America... biblically http://www.miamiherald.com/americas_conference/story/711991.html |
2008/10/3-9 [Science/GlobalWarming] UID:51378 Activity:nil |
10/3 Wind changes, not global warming are cause of Greenland and West Antarctic ice sheet losses (Blog referencing two new articles in Science) http://tinyurl.com/4cs4fq \_ If you actually looked at the articles you'd see they are blaming the wind changes ON GLOBAL WARMING. Look this isn't hard. The environment is a chaotic system that settled into a local minmum. That's rarely stable. All it takes is a little push and things go haywire. Global warming is that push. |
2008/10/3-6 [Consumer/Camera, Computer/HW/Printer] UID:51379 Activity:low |
10/3 Hey tom, can you tell us why Canon is better than Nikon? I'm shopping and can't decide. \_ I think Canon and Nikon are comparable. -tom \_ #f spec for spec, price-value-wise, lense selection, Canon beats Nikon hands down. \- if you dont have an investment in nikon, buy canon. if price truly is not object, then there might be some debatable issues depending on what you want. but actually what you should do is fix you budget, which will determine a small range of bodies and you should them compare specific models not brands. especially if you are in the $1k - $1.5k range ... if you are never going to be looking at +$1k lenses, who cares about those. --nikon owner \_ You can rent lenses easily at pro shops. Even pros do it all the time. \_ Another reason might be that you have very specific needs on lenses. I imagine you can use the 1972 Nikkor 6mm f/2.8 fisheye (angle of view = 220 degrees -- seeing behind itself!) or the 1990 Nikkor 1200-1700mm f/5.6-8 (not a reflex) on a Nikon D body in manual mode. But other than that, I heard that Canon usually gives a better bang for the buck. -- owner of Nikon FM2n, N70, D80. \- yes, that is why i wrote "if you dont have an investment in nikon". and renting is not a reasonable option if you are travelling for a month ... and those are the pix i really care about. i still like the "feel" of nikons more than canon, but it comes at a high price and isnt directly contributing to the quality of the results. when you get down to comparing specific models, sometimes user inerface matters more than trivial diffs in quantitiative stats. e.g. it is really annoying when some setting you change a lot is on a two deep menu rather than on a dedicated dial ... i would gladly trade some megapixels for that interface change. --http://home.lbl.gov:8080/~psb/PSB_MISC/PSB_N1-fb.jpg \_ UI is very subjective. Hey what kind of lenses have you invested in? Do you have a bunch of EF-S/DX lenses that'll get obsolete in 5 years? \_ wedding photographers rent equipments all the time \- the economics of photography change dramatically if you can justify it as a business expence. |
11/22 |