|
2008/5/16-23 [Science/Biology] UID:49966 Activity:nil |
5/16 Catholicism has no problem with evolution. Judaism is down. Most of the mainstream Protestant denominations are fine with it too. Dunno about Mormons. Why do the Christian spinoffs in the USA hate science? \_ None of the Dynasty spinoffs were very good. \_ Catholicism *had* problem with evolution. They had to change their view when faced with the facts in order to survive. I think the Christian spinoffs will have to to change their views as well in order to survive. It's just a matter of time. It's similar to the Gallelio case. Galileo case. \_ Official LDS doctrine says precisely nothing about evolution. Evolution is taught at the BYU biology department. \_ LDS completely ignores the book of Genesis? |
2008/5/16 [Health/Women] UID:49967 Activity:insanely high |
5/16 Tuesday marked 3 months from the date of my breast surgery! I went from a J cup to a DD cup (I asked to go down to a D but believe me, I'm not complaining! I'm trying to lose weight anyways, so that might help them go down even more). I bought my first dress EVER without needing to alter it last week! I'm so so so happy I did this :) \_ Some women would kill for the 1 2 3 4 5 6 cup sizes you lost |
2008/5/16-21 [Reference/Religion] UID:49968 Activity:nil |
5/16 "Einstein's musings about religion sells for $400K" http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20080516/ap_en_bu/britain_einstein_letter \_ Yes but computer science god Knuth was very very religious. I failed to see the point you're trying to make. \_ Since when do posts on motd always have points to make? |
2008/5/16-21 [Transportation/Car] UID:49969 Activity:nil |
5/15 Here's a picture of San Francisco in 1971 http://pic.templetons.com/brad/pano/midpano/sf71.jpg check out the freeway! - danh \_ A double-deck freeway along the Embarcadero? Is it fake? \_ No, it was demolished soon after the 1988 earthquake. \_ 1989 \_ and a great example of how removal of freeways can make a city more attractive and liveable. -tom \_ Only fire would make SF more attractive. \_ Only a nuke would make LA more attractive. |
2008/5/16-17 [Uncategorized] UID:49970 Activity:nil |
5/15 bay bridge closure sched: http://www.baybridgeinfo.org/Display.aspx?ID=52 |
2008/5/16 [Politics/Foreign/Asia/Japan, Reference/History/WW2/Japan] UID:49971 Activity:moderate |
5/15 i may post some lame stuff but the underage japanese youtube video of girl staring at camera is pretty stupid \_ She's not even japanese \_ Yes she is japanese, 1/2, you FUCKING DUMB ASS. Your Japanese is horrible and your brain has been classified as: narrow minded. Now go back to school and expand your mind. |
2008/5/16-23 [Politics/Domestic/Gay, Politics/Domestic/California/Arnold] UID:49972 Activity:nil |
5/16 fans of gay people, here is coverage and numerous photos of reaction to gay marriage decision in San Fran-sissy: http://jameth.livejournal.com/tag/gay+marriage \_ Why the hell are the justices mostly Republicans? \_ Why do you ask? What does it matter? \_ The Republican Party should excommunicate these RINOs. Schwartzenegger too, he is not of sufficient ideological Schwarzenegger too, he is not of sufficient ideological purity. |
2008/5/16-23 [Politics/Domestic/Election, Politics/Domestic/President/Bush] UID:49973 Activity:nil |
5/16 Congress passes huge pork bill. http://tinyurl.com/4wwys7 http://tinyurl.com/44fywg \_ Hello NATIONAL REVIEW crap! \_ Is it wrong? \_ No. NationalReview is right. Very RIGHT. Righteous. Right wing. Right. \_ Is this an interesting line of discussion to you? Partisan line-drawing and team-based politics? Left, right: it's all bullshit. Both left and right wing politicians do stupid and corrupt things. The rational individual will evaluate criticism impartially. \_ The rational individual learns that some sources are untrustworthy propaganda. While there may be a story here, I'm not going to pay much attention to the National Review's framing because I know they are mendacious idealouges. (That being said I am anti-farm subsidy, but there are plenty of sane op eds out there declaiming the current bill.) \_ Context seems to mean that you are saying that there are lots of sane op-eds out there supporting this bill. URL please? (if so) \_ Untrustworthy propaganda? It's an op-ed. It is not even a source. Find me a better op-ed then. You talk as if you have no brain and can't judge an argument on its own merits. Where's the outcry from a mainstream source? \_ If it's an op-ed, then label it as such. Posting a bunch of shortened urls with a label that appears to be about news is misleading. -10 pts. \_ It is now. Any fact given in NRO immediately becomes untrue by virtue of being printed there. \_ Meet the new boss, same as the old boss. |
2008/5/16-23 [Reference/History/WW2/Germany] UID:49974 Activity:nil |
5/16 Seattle Times editor defends Hitler, Chamberlain. WTF? http://blog.seattletimes.nwsource.com/edcetera/2008/05/bush_and_his_use_of_appeasemen.html \_ Uh, did you even read the article? \_ Uhhh.. yes. "What Hitler was demanding was not unreasonable." \_ it is kind of cool that he self Godwin'ed \_ Uh, did you read the *whole* article? |
2008/5/16-6/13 [Politics/Domestic/California] UID:49975 Activity:nil |
5/16 Planned free public transit day on June 19, 2008: http://www.sparetheair.org \_ Except BART. \_ Where's it say that? \_ Sorry, no free rides on spare the air day (March 15th). My bad... \_ You meant May 15th (and 16th), right? \_ ^free^taxpayer funded \_ Is there any kind of "free" that's not funded by someone / something? \_ Free as in freedom? \_ "Free" in the sense that the first reply was saying it wasn't "free". \_ Yes. But in this case, no. The government can not give anyone anything for free in the real sense of the word because the government produces nothing. The government, on a good day, only transfer wealth from producers to non-producers. On a typical day, the government destroys a good portion of that wealth along the way. On a bad day, the government flat out destroys wealth or prevents the creation of wealth. \_ You should move somewhere nice, like Iraq. \_ You should actually read what I said before snapping off a brainless one liner. \_ So why don't anarchies like Somalia have the world's best economies? \_ Because no one is advocating anarchy. The government has a role collecting taxes to raise a common defense, building roads/bridges and other infrastructure projects. The government has no business taking from one group of people to benefit another group to empower themselves at the ballot box. The government does not create wealth. The government can enable/assist others to do by so building infrastructure or destroy wealth creation through taxation and regulations. \_ Some regulations are good of course. E.g. to protect common resources like air quality, to prevent fraud, or prevent cabals/monopolies from screwing people. \_ But the govt is taking from one group (taxpayers) to build toll-free highways to benefit another group (drivers). \_ What % of taxpayers drive? Honest question. \_ "The government does not create wealth" is a completely meaningless statement. Want to \_ It's not meaningless, it's false. Learn the difference. -- ilyas know the #1 employer in California? UC. UC also does more research and invents more things than any company in California. Unless your definition of "creating wealth" is limited to "giving money to the CEO", it is obvious that the government can and does create wealth. -tom \_ So UC is the #1 employeer. So what? Its not like UC is self-sustaining - w/o tax revenues, government, including UC, can't operate. When the government starts making a profit independent of tax revenue and starts sharing that profit with the people, then one can say that government has created wealth. Since that day will almost certainly never come, government cannot create wealth. \_ I was going to respond to this, but it's simply too stupid. But here's a hint: wealth takes forms other than cash. -tom \_ I'm not pro-socialism but this is not accurate. In the simplest case, if the state owns a mine and operates it then technically it creates wealth. Maybe you should define "create wealth". \_ Well my definition is pretty simple: wealth is created when an operation is able to repay its creditors, cover its operational expenses, and still has money left over that can be distributed to its members/investors. Can government run its operations such that repays its creditors (the taxpayers), covers its operational expenses, and then still has money left over that can be distributed to the taxpayers? I can agree that parts of the government can create wealth under this standard (e.g. the USPTO or a mine in your example), but as a whole, government cannot create wealth. There is no incentive for it to create wealth and most of its operations are not designed for wealth creation (I suppose if our government started to follow the British colonial model and plundered from the places it invades, then our government could generate wealth, but I hope this is not where we are headed). Perhaps tom is right that government can create wealth in non-quantifiable ways. But, that kind of "wealth," unlike dollars, euros, &c. can't be used to better your life independent of location, so I don't think it counts. \_ It's obvious that education hasn't bettered your life. -tom \_ Actually my UC engineering degree was quite worthless. Mostly the moderate financial success I have had was due to things I did outside of my ug education along with private professional school. And the cost of my ug degree was more than paid for by my tuition and the taxes I and my parents have paid over the years. \_ yes, but some people make it through Cal and actually are not complete morons afterwards. Sorry you couldn't manage it. -tom \_ Yes. For instance sea water is free. \_ Sure. "Planned free sea water day on June 19, 2008!" \_ "All you can drink!" |
2008/5/16-23 [Reference/Tax] UID:49976 Activity:nil |
5/16 "You'd be taxing success here," Kevin Casey, Harvard's associate vice president for government, community and public affairs complained in a quote that will soon be framed and hung in my office. "Over time, this would put us at a real competitive disadvantage, which would drastically hurt the Commonwealth." \_ ugh you again \_ You don't see the irony? \_ NO FUCKER. TELL ME WHERE THE HUMOR IS. \_ Clearly you were Harvard-educated... Okay, do you support the current progressive tax system? \_ ok dude do you really think we should start taxing the endowments of universities? \_ Okay, so you won't answer the question. Why do you think we shouldn't tax them? \_ I find you uninteresting and boring, glenn beck \_ You too e e cummings \_ Yeah. Why should the ivory tower get a pass on taxes? \_ because they're non-profit. \_ They are private and very profitable. Their non-profit status is a legal fiction. |
2008/5/16-23 [Academia/Berkeley/CSUA/Motd] UID:49977 Activity:nil |
5/16 motd not getting laid guy here. I'm back from vacation. \_ did you get laid on vacation? \_ that would make me 'motd getting laid guy' \_ actually, 'motd got laid guy' \_ Either could be correct. \_ 'getting' tends to imply he will continue to do so on a regular basis. Probably not true unless he is permanently on vacation (say, in thailand). \_ Could also imply he was getting laid at the very moment he typed it. Ew. \_ Was that a vacation from the motd or did you actually go someplace special? |
2008/5/16 [Politics/Foreign/Europe] UID:49978 Activity:nil 80%like:49980 |
5/16 German Chancellor deploying Weapons of Mass Distraction at national opera house in Norwey: http://news.ifeng.com/photo/200804/0414_24_489359.shtml |
2008/5/16-23 [Politics/Domestic/President/Clinton, Politics/Domestic/President/Reagan] UID:49979 Activity:nil |
5/1 Huckabee's lame Obama joke http://blogs.abcnews.com/politicalradar/2008/05/huckabee-jokes.html \_ He might have been referring to this: http://www.banhandgunsnow.org/everyhandgun/index.html http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=132x5582268 http://preview.tinyurl.com/4fvb83 [democratic underground] |
2008/5/16-23 [Politics/Foreign/Europe] UID:49980 Activity:nil 80%like:49978 |
5/16 German Chancellor Merkel deploying Weapons of Mass Distraction at national opera house in Norwey: http://www.csua.org/u/lko (Yahoo! News) |
2008/5/16-17 [Academia/Berkeley/CSUA/Motd, Academia/Berkeley/CSUA/Troll] UID:49981 Activity:moderate |
5/15 Cute underaged girls who looks like someone in anime. You'll appreciate this if you're into anime. Otherwise, you're probably think this is stupid. Bad teeth, big eyes, good Japanese. Yay! -Asianphile http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Gty73p4AYuA http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Hr_IroQwcjQ http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=J_C7VLrCnqo link:tinyurl.com/6jgxyu http://tinyurl.com/4m2rzv \_ Dude, no one wants to see this stupid video. No one on YouTube likes it and it has been deleted from MOTD repeatedly (not just \_ no one? the rating's pretty high. YOU don't like it, fine, but don't speak for others, fucking dimwit \_ Read the comments and the first video got 2 stars out of 5. \_ what about the rest? and all the other videos she has? what is the average? ANSWER ME. by me). The video sucks by any definition. Why is this crappy video of a bland, unattractive girl doing nothing of note of interest to anyone? --dim interest to anyone? Post the one where she takes her top off \_ look, i don't like jackie johnson. you are the most narrow minded piece of crap i've ever met. fuck off \_ If I spam MOTD with youtube videos of JJ then feel free to delete. You sure are defensive. or something. --dim \_ to each his own. Fuck off dim. \_ Yes, let's just post all of our favorite 25 youtube links to MOTD. What are you trying to accomplish here? You say yourself that people will probably think it's stupid. It is. \_ Why are her eyes so big? \_ I see motd boob guy had a kid named motd weirdo asian fetish I never thought of before guy. |
2008/5/16-23 [Politics/Domestic/SocialSecurity] UID:49982 Activity:nil |
5/16 Why did Social Security ever get passed in 1935? Stupid. \_ because you're an idiot? \_ Correlation does not imply causation. \_ FDR was a communist who hated America, see also, the New Deal and the Yalta Conference. \_ Because no one envisioned that some day population growth will slow down and the pay-as-you go scheme will collapse. Actually, it is predicted that the social security will not be able to honor the currently promissed retirement payments some time in the 2050s. Not bad for such a "badly" designed system. Still, something should be done about it soner rather than later. |
2008/5/16-23 [Uncategorized] UID:49983 Activity:nil |
5/16 Don't you hate it when this happens? Try touch typing on this: http://www.flickr.com/photos/jacobgordon/2455618195/in/photostream |
2008/5/16-17 [Uncategorized] UID:49984 Activity:nil |
5/16 RIP Robert Mondavi |
2008/5/16 [Uncategorized] UID:49985 Activity:nil |
5/15 This is stupid. |
2008/5/16 [Uncategorized] UID:49986 Activity:nil |
5/16 Dim, why don't you FUCK OFF |
12/24 |