|
2008/3/14-17 [Politics/Domestic, Politics/Domestic/911] UID:49455 Activity:nil |
3/14 Creatures Clone Selves in Face of Danger - Yahoo! News: http://www.csua.org/u/l18 How is this different from asexual reproduction? |
2008/3/14-17 [Reference/RealEstate] UID:49456 Activity:nil |
3/14 Bay Area homes: "Spectacularly low sales counts" http://www.dqnews.com/News/California/Bay-Area/RRBay080313.aspx \_ but but but prices are stable! only $2K drop from last year! and loans formerly known as jumbo are gonna become available any time now!!!1 \_ Which model yacht(s) does your landlord own? How many times have you gone sailing with your landlord? \_ LANDLORD WITH A YACHT!!!!!11!! \_ My land didn't come with a yacht. I think we should have a federal law requiring a yacht to be provided with every land sale, to ensure the dream of ownership is properly fulfilled. \_ BITTER RENTER!!!!!1!1 WITH A YACHT!!!11!!! \_ Because you're one of those "I'm going to make a zillion dollars renting out a second home and be a land lord!" types. Real land lords own multiple units, don't have a day job, and own yachts with money they got from the bitter ALL-CAPS!!!11!! renters. \_ Yeah, they sure do when they're underwater on all their mortages and the bank is about to foreclose. Oh wait, you mean the entire US housing market is confined to Noe Valley? \_ My previous landlord owned the 50-unit building at Dwight and Ellsworth, and his day job was being the manager and the handyman. He always seemed to be fixing something. \_ All the multi-millionaire landlords I know spend all their time futzing with their properties. \_ But how can they. They're too busy with their YACHTS!!!!11! |
2008/3/14-17 [Finance/Banking, Finance/Investment] UID:49457 Activity:high |
3/14 Fed provides emergency financing to BSC via JPM as other banks refuse to lend to BSC at fed funds target Fed to take on all credit risk for BSC collateral used to obtain financing http://online.wsj.com/article/SB120550108028136579.html On Monday, BSC said in a statement, "there is absolutely no truth to the rumors of liquidity problems" http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601087&sid=aa874wpC8wcg \_ Someone please translate this to plain English? \_ You went to Cal? \_ Read the WSJ article. WSJ = Wall Street Journal. If you have q's, come back. \_ The wsj article seems reasonable clear. In any event, here is my understanding: Bear Stearns Co. (BSC), a large NY investment bank, may not have enough money to meet its obligations. J.P. Morgan (JPM) has borrowed money from the Federal Reserve Bank (Fed) and loaned it to BSC to ensure that BSC has enough money to meet its obligations. JPM, unlike BSC, is not technically an investment bank, and therefore it may borrow money directly from the Fed. JPM is merely acting as a conduit for the Fed's loan to BSC. BSC has pleged its assets to the Fed as security for the loan. If BSC's asserts drop in value, then the Fed, and the loan. If BSC's assets drop in value, then the Fed, and the taxpayers, will take the loss; JPM is not taking on any risk. \_ Why would we care? I mean, we're already borrowing a lot of money and our deficit is huge, why can't we just borrow more? I mean, if you owe the bank $1 million dollars, the bank owns you. But if you owe the bank $100 trillion dollars, then you own the bank. \_ Which is why the dollar is doing oh so well on the international market right now. \_ 99 yen to 1 dollar! \_ Personally I am concerned about the level of debt the government takes on. I do not know if bailing out BSC is better than the alternative, which is to let if fail. I guess we have to trust that the Fed knows what it is doing. \_ The Fed is in panic mode: "The Fed's role in the deal suggests federal officials fear a systemic collapse of the U.S. financial system were Bear Stearns to fail. The fear stems from Bear central role in a multitrillion-dollar web of interconnecting derivative contracts." \_ Probably. Something about this situation reminds me of the LTCM fiasco a few years back. \- I dunno how old you were in 1998, but the funny part of this is Bear Stearns is the banks that part of this is Bear Stearns is the bank that refused to play ball ... the scrappy outsider... during the "genteel" bailout of LTCM. It's also amazing to read about the arrogance of the LTCM insiders dictating terms of the bailout. Just unfucking believable. \- I dunno how old you were when LTCM happened, but the funny part of this is Bear Stearns is the bank that refused to play ball ... the scrappy outsider ... during the "genteel" bailout of LTCM. It's also amazing to read about the arrogance of the LTCM insiders dictating terms of the bailout. Just unfucking believable. \_ I didn't remember that BSC was one of the hold outs during the LTCM bailout. That is so ironic. Re arrogance of LTCM insiders - Being a nobel prize winner and 'furd prof goes to some people heads. \- it's not just merton and scholes. YMWTR: http://tinyurl.com/rcrv8 \_ Deregulating the financial system was a mistake. \_ Libural socialist rant! Why do you hate America? \_ Yeah, me and FDR. Known America haters. \_ FDR hated America, not only did he sell out this country at Yalta, he also instigated the New Deal which was pratically communist. was practically communist. \_ Whoa! When the did the Birchers show up on the motd?! \_ Time to return to a gold and/or silver standard! -rpaul \_ Time to put Glass-Stiegel back in place. Though it is too late for this recession, at least it will keep the next one from being as bad. I fear we will see a New Deal style nationalization of the banking system before this is all said and done. |
2008/3/14-17 [Politics/Domestic/President/Clinton, Politics/Domestic/Election] UID:49458 Activity:nil |
3/14 Yay! Dem-led congress rejects earmark reforms! \_ Earmark reform is a strange beast. It is arguable people mad at something but taking it out on the wrong tool. Earmarks by nature are not evil. Earmark != pork. \_ Yes, all earmark = pork. \_ Meet the new boss, same as the old boss. We won't be fooled again! \_ "earmark reform" is one of those great conservative ideology-laden terms, like "tax reform" and "welfare reform." Conservatives don't really have a problem with earmarks; they just don't want to provide public services. -tom \_ Case in point, 2000-2006 congresses were the worst ever with respect to earmarks, but now that the Democrats got control Bush and the republicans in congress have been complaining about earmarks long and loud. The democrats did push through a bill that required that the earmarker actually be named in an earmark so that you could see what congresscritter asked for what earmarks, which was something that could not pass when the republicans controlled congress. \_ Note: Obama has released his earmarks. Hillary "I've got a secret" Clinton has not as of yet. McCain hasn't been doing earmarks for a while. |
2008/3/14-17 [Reference/RealEstate] UID:49459 Activity:nil |
3/14 sub-prime mortgage blues (oldie but goodie) http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=13qWw7waSeM |
2008/3/14-17 [Academia/UCLA] UID:49460 Activity:nil |
3/14 Someone please repost the link to home affordability charts? I need a proof from the UCLA professor that there will be a crash to prevent my wife from whining about this new condo that we can barely afford even though it's $50K cheaper than last year. \_ http://bp2.blogger.com/_8m7jYiLM_DI/Rvf3K2aCzsI/AAAAAAAAAXw/C_Fp_Kop7Hc/s1600-h/resetbigchart.gif \_ link:preview.tinyurl.com/ysnbe4 (bp2.blogger.com) http://drhousingbubble.blogspot.com |
2008/3/14-17 [Uncategorized] UID:49461 Activity:nil |
3/14 Perfect motto for the Republican Party: NEVER BACK DOWN. Show them you're rough and tough! http://www.neverbackdownthemovie.com |
2008/3/14-17 [Politics/Domestic/Election] UID:49462 Activity:low |
3/14 Obama: Anti landmine. Clinton: "uh... well... you know I don't want to be seen as weak on defense...." McCain: I'm going to go out on a limb and say he's pro landmine. THE CHOICE IS CLEAR. \- you know the landmine issue is more complicated than you and "Princess" Di spin it to be. Yes, scattering them around the countryside [Afghanistan, SE Asia] is irresponsible, but planted along a DMZ, they are defensive, not offensive weapons. I dont think a categorical ban makes sense. Of course we know what happened to John "nuanced answers" Kerry. \_ Yeah fuck nuance. landmines suck. they outlast your conflict. they maim future generations. no one should be using them. \_ I couldn't agree more. Just think what would have happened to the Federation if Sisko had adopted a nancy Euro-Picard "Mr. Worf Hail Our Surrender" anti-mine stance and had failed to mine the wormhole at the end of Season 5. |
2008/3/14-17 [Computer/SW/OS/OsX] UID:49463 Activity:nil |
3/14 Obama is a Mac Daddy http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=khuu-RhOBDU \_ Completely unfunny. \_ Can I have those 10 minutes of my life back? |