|
2008/2/29 [Politics/Domestic/President/Clinton, Politics/Foreign/MiddleEast/Israel] UID:49298 Activity:nil 97%like:49305 |
2/28 The lying, despicable campaign to turn Jews against Obama http://tpmcafe.talkingpointsmemo.com/2008/02/29/the_lying_despicable_campaign |
2008/2/29-3/4 [Politics/Domestic/California, Politics/Domestic/President/Clinton] UID:49299 Activity:nil |
2/28 http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=L3gQfz8GC0o http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Etk_O-nhlA4 \_ Hillary cackles in response to serious questions as technique to avoid answering same questions. Amusing but not really meaningful now since her campaign ended Feb 5th. |
2008/2/29-3/4 [Politics/Foreign/Asia/India] UID:49300 Activity:nil |
2/29 Economy is good in Afghanistan. http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/23408353 In other news, drug trades in Afghanistan is at record levels. Go USA USA USA! |
2008/2/29-3/5 [Industry/Startup] UID:49301 Activity:low |
2/29 google to move 1200 people to downtown sf http://www.bizjournals.com/sanfrancisco/stories/2008/03/03/story1.html \_ And we care because...? \_ I was thinking that places downtown will double what they charge for parking, and they'll get away with it since avg Google salary is 200k. \_ You know, top 200 employees make over several millions but the MEDIAN base salary is still 100K/year. But I guess if you average everyone out, it's probably 200K/year. Still, ost people do NOT make 200K/year, I assure you. -G employee most emps do NOT make 200K/year, I assure you. -G employee \_ I bet the bonus you get makes up for this. Or maybe your group is in charge of driving those buses around. \_ Uh, no. Google gives lower base salary but higher bonus. It's based on "meritocracy." When you add up base and bonus, it's pretty much the same as other big companies. Now if you add stock options as an employee who joined prior to 2004, yes 200K is not an unreasonable guess. But remember the company more than doubled since 2004 meaning MOST employees after 2004 do NOT make anywhere near 200K. It is a sad myth that all G employees are rich. Many are, most are not. -pp ost emps do NOT make 200K/year, I assure you. -G employee \_ Shouldn't employees who joined prior to 2004 with pre-IPO options be super-rich by now? Even if the option price was $100, they still made $300+ per share with today's price. \_ Yes and that is why more than 65% of them have already left the company. Read the post above, as the company size increases the suckiness increases as well. Most of the employees today do NOT make that much. The rich already left for retirement, or the next big thing. \_ Google is old news. |
2008/2/29-3/5 [Uncategorized] UID:49302 Activity:nil |
2/29 Someone asked last week about T-Shirts of the Oakland dock loaders dreaming of Star Wars Imperial Walkers. Heres' the website: http://www.thegirlandrhino.com (--peterl) \_ Thanks! I just ordered two. |
2008/2/29-3/4 [Computer/SW/Security] UID:49303 Activity:nil |
2/28 Hi do I allow only a certain SSH key to run a particular command? \_ Look for LocalCommand in ssh_config(5). Unless you're literally asking what you seem to be asking, in which case you're probably out of luck. \_ Read the manpages for authorized_keys file if you're using openssh. You can specify the "absolute command" in there, or have it call a wrapper and have it process the $SSH_ORIGINAL_COMMAND variable. \- see /tmp/authorized_keys.acl-sample for an example. who is asking? |
2008/2/29-3/4 [Recreation/Music] UID:49304 Activity:nil |
2/28 what is most productive coding music: CONAN THE BARBARIAN soundtrack: generic techno: The Code Monkey Song: http://www.jonathancoulton.com/music/thingaweek/CodeMonkey.mp3 KCSM: . KPMG: . The Bourne soundtracks: . \_ The consulting firm? \_ Their theme song. Gets me in the coding mood every time. The Bourne soundtracks: . Dead silence: .. groove salad (somafm): Autechre, or death metal: . |
2008/2/29-3/4 [Politics/Domestic/President/Clinton, Politics/Foreign/MiddleEast/Israel] UID:49305 Activity:nil 97%like:49298 |
2/28 The lying, despicable campaign to turn Jews against Obama http://preview.tinyurl.com/38zy54 (tpm) \_ Man, I keep misreading this as: 'The lying, despicable campaign of the Jews against Obama' \_ I read the first 10 paragraphs or so before I couldn't take it anymore. This opinion piece is just stupid and fact free. \_ So you think that attempting to Godwin Obama is legit? \_ No one is Godwining Obama. Or if they are this 'article' certainly doesn't make a strong case for it. The flip side of the Godwin thing is that you're not being Godwinned if the charges are true, which remains to be seen in Obama's case, since he's a good speaker but doesn't say much. \_ I see. So you're in bed with the smear tactics. Cool, got it. \_ That line doesn't even make sense. Shessh. -!pp \_ Classic case of reading what you want to read, instead of reading what was said. Your Rhetoric 1A grade to date is "F," but you still have time to pull it up to a "C" if you work at it and come to office hours every week. -pp \_ This really is a poorly written article. It's making a mountain of a molehill (Tim Russert) who was already making a molehill of a pebble (Farrakhan). It's like cascading stupidity. \- i thought it was a decent article. it is about more than just the tim russert issue. it might have been nice to have a few more facts about how "marginal" farrakhan is, but i can understand why he didnt get into it ... i think most of his audience would have been willing to accept farrakhan = nutjob and you dont need to do much more than draw the analogy to an endorsement from David Duke. |
2008/2/29-3/4 [Politics/Domestic/President/Bush] UID:49306 Activity:nil |
2/29 Two more criminals Bush is sure to pardon: http://www.csua.org/u/kxk \_ You really want to review past Presidential pardons as a troll? That's pretty dull stuff. You can do better than this, Shirley. \_ I guess you are right, crooked Republicans are a dime a dozen these days. |
2008/2/29-3/1 [Politics] UID:49307 Activity:moderate |
2/29 Socialism promotes state ownership of capital/industry. What do you call a system which promotes personal ownership of it? i.e. design measures to make more people own the business in which they work. That might involve limitations on how much any one individual may be allowed to own in capital, thus enforcing more widespread ownership. Promote competition and market effectiveness by acting against consolidation and in favor of small businesspeople. Instead of neo-feudal corporate peasants, limit the power of corporations in favor of worker cooperatives. \_ Where are you pasting this stuff from? \_ "Privitazation"? Or just plain o' "capitalism"? |
3/15 |