| ||||||
| 2007/12/20-29 [Computer/Networking] UID:48841 Activity:nil |
12/20 Why the hell does Cisco "The Human Network" advertise on the
History Channel, and why the hell are they so annoying?
"... not just network, HUMAN NETWORK!" Dumb shit. |
| 2007/12/20-29 [Computer/SW/WWW/Browsers] UID:48842 Activity:nil |
12/20 How do I make Mozilla Thunderbird grab all the contents of
my IMAP folders too when I go offline ? It grabs 'Inbox'
just fine, but doesn't update my various folders unless
I click on them. thanks.
\_ You missed the checkbox in "Offline & Disk Space" that says, "When I
create new folders, select them for offline use", and the button
titled "Select folders for offline use" that are right below the
checkbox "Make the messages in my Inbox available when I am working
offline"?
\_ I did this before... I don't think it grabs the messages still,
until I click on the folder. Weird. |
| 2007/12/20-29 [Politics/Foreign/Europe] UID:48843 Activity:kinda low |
12/20 We don't need no stinking Kyoto:
http://www.americanthinker.com/blog/2007/12/kyoto_schmyoto.html
The Kyoto treaty was agreed upon in late 1997 and countries started
signing and ratifying it in 1998. A list of countries and their carbon
dioxide emissions due to consumption of fossil fuels is available from
the U.S. government. If we look at that data and compare 2004 (latest
year for which data is available) to 1997 (last year before the Kyoto
treaty was signed), we find the following.
Emissions worldwide increased 18.0%.
Emissions from countries that signed the treaty increased 21.1%.
Emissions from non-signers increased 10.0%.
Emissions from the U.S. increased 6.6%.
In fact, emissions from the U.S. grew slower than those of over 75% of
the countries that signed Kyoto.
\_ Wow! If this is true, how come the Bush Admin didn't make a fuss
about this?
\_ Well, that's a little misleading since the "developing" signers
didn't actually have to do anything, and they're the ones with the
really big growth numbers. They are pushing up the averages.
\_ No, that is exactly the point.
\_ US: 6.6%
Canada, 8.8%
Japan, 11%
Finland, 15%
Norway, 24%
Iceland, 29%
China, 55%
\_ China is developing. Anyway, hy only published a few
countries. Why about France, Britain, Germany, etc? I guess
it doesn't really matter, I think Kyoto is dumb too.
\_ France, 6.2%
UK, 3.4%
Germany, -1.6%
Spain, 37.8%
\_ China's emissions exceed ours now. They're the biggest
emiiters in the world. The author has an XLS sheet of
absolute numbers.
\_ That link appears to be broken. Anyway, Kyoto was
designed to have that result. Why be surprised?
\_ Link works for me.
http://www.census.gov/compendia/statab/tables/08s1314.xls
\_ So I am curious, are you trying to make the claim that the Kyoto
treaty actually led to the world producing *more* greenhouse gases
than if it had not been signed? That seems pretty unlikely to me.
If you are claiming that is was ineffective, I agree, we need much
more stringent standards than the ones we have now.
\_ No, we just need to meet the standards already in place.
\_ No, I mean that the harping on ratifying the protocol or not is
silly, when we're doing better than most countries that signed on
to it. -op |
| 2007/12/20-29 [Recreation/Dating] UID:48844 Activity:low |
12/20 Seriously, what will happen if I break 1 mil on Guitar Hero?
\_ You're still not getting laid
\_ So why would that make me Gay?
\_ It's really easy to get laid if you're gay?
\_ It is for me - I can literally get laid within the hour
if I wanted to with someone attractive. I had a date
within 20 minutes of setting up a profile on http://gay.com |
| 2007/12/20 [Politics/Domestic/California] UID:48845 Activity:nil |
12/20 ultramonkey has a stupid name and appears to not have been updated
So the dumbducks in Congress are legislating what type of light
\_ Oh my god. You are dumb. Suppose what you said was
\_ You're an idiot who didn't read the link or pay
\_ You're a fucking dumb ass. If you had a $10k chandelier
anyone of having no sense of taste? You're a moron.
\_ Seconded, the op sounds like a dumb ass.
\_ Wow, you're dumb and don't even realize it.
\_ You know what is even dumber about this idea? In probably 10
is going to look pretty stupid in 10-20 years, I bet.
\_ Wow. The PM's at your company are either assholes or idiots. -dans
dumb to decide those arent the numbers you
\_ 'linear combination of arrogant and dumb',
people who believe stupid rhetoric about "death taxes" or
if you say "candidate X is either a moron or a liar". 2. many
positions are morons and scientists ... so they probably do
weak/stupid -- witness our tolerance for predatory lending.
to take advantage of stupid ones? Morally OK?
Granted, government can't protect stupid people
bastards who're taking advantage of the stupid. You know,
\_ congratulations, you're not stupid! Now how would you
feel if by a combination of having been born stupid
stupid ones over? Now, do you think you're smarter than
stupid and doesn't attack the problem. It exacerbates it by giving
price to some dumb shmuck. There are far more cases of people
don't agree you're either stupid or in |
| 2007/12/20-29 [Finance/Shopping] UID:48846 Activity:low |
12/20 anyone got a source of good looking free clip art for network
diagram type stuff, suitable for use in Inkscape or Opendraw?
Yes I am too cheap to buy Visio.
\_ Doesn't this question come up about every other week?
\_ It sure does! I tried Inkscape, couldn't handle it.
\_ too cheap for visio, but are you cheap enough to use xfig ?
google for 'network diagram' and 'linux' and you'll find a host of
other free options too.
\_ http://www.openclipart.org |