Berkeley CSUA MOTD:2007:October:05 Friday <Thursday, Saturday>
Berkeley CSUA MOTD
 
WIKI | FAQ | Tech FAQ
http://csua.com/feed/
2007/10/5-9 [Politics/Domestic/Election, ERROR, uid:48243, category id '18005#13.5625' has no name! , ] UID:48243 Activity:moderate
10/5    Republicans trying to stack the deck in the Federal Elections
        Commission by either nominating a known voter suppression
        specialist or by allowing Bush to make recess appointments.
        http://www.tpmmuckraker.com/archives/004396.php \_ Uhm, the FEC
        is always 3 D and 3 R.  What deck are you talking
           about?  \_ Read the article.  Just because it is 3d and 3r
           doesn't mean
              it should be a body staffed by people who make partisan
              choices the number one priority.  Just like the Justice
              department should strive for being non partisan.  \_
              I read the article before posting and a pile of the blog
                 responses as well.  Everything in DC is staffed by
                 partisan hacks with the _possible_ exception of the GAO.
                 Maybe.  I'm not impressed with the need to screw up the
                 FEC just so this one guy doesn't join them for a term.
                 What was in the article that explains exactly what is
                 so horrible about him anyway?  Unless he's out raping
                 nuns and sheep and sheep nuns it isn't important and no
                 I don't care which party he's a member of.  There are
                 partisan hacks and plenty of em from both sides all over
                 the place.  And frankly, what is so wrong with being a
                 partisan in a 2 party confrontational system?  Lack of
                 partisanship just reduces us to one party like so many
                 petty totalitarian regimes.  Bring on the partisans of
                 all parties, I say.
        \_ Uhm, the FEC is always 3 D and 3 R.  What deck are you talking
           about?
           \_ Read the article.  Just because it is 3d and 3r doesn't mean
           \_ Read the article.  Just because it is 3d and 3r
              doesn't mean
              it should be a body staffed by people who make partisan
              choices the number one priority.  Just like the Justice
              department should strive for being non partisan.
              \_ I read the article before posting and a pile of the blog
                 responses as well.  Everything in DC is staffed by partisan
                 hacks with the _possible_ exception of the GAO.  Maybe.
                 I'm not impressed with the need to screw up the FEC just so
                 this one guy doesn't join them for a term.  What was in the
                 article that explains exactly what is so horrible about him
                 anyway?  Unless he's out raping nuns and sheep and sheep nuns
                 it isn't important and no I don't care which party he's a
                 member of.  There are partisan hacks and plenty of em from
                 both sides all over the place.  And frankly, what is so wrong
                 with being a partisan in a 2 party confrontational system?
                 Lack of partisanship just reduces us to one party like so
                 many petty totalitarian regimes.  Bring on the partisans of
                 responses as well.  Everything in DC is staffed by
                 partisan hacks with the _possible_ exception of the GAO.
                 Maybe.  I'm not impressed with the need to screw up the
                 FEC just so this one guy doesn't join them for a term.
                 What was in the article that explains exactly what is
                 so horrible about him anyway?  Unless he's out raping
                 nuns and sheep and sheep nuns it isn't important and no
                 I don't care which party he's a member of.  There are
                 partisan hacks and plenty of em from both sides all over
                 the place.  And frankly, what is so wrong with being a
                 partisan in a 2 party confrontational system?  Lack of
                 partisanship just reduces us to one party like so many
                 petty totalitarian regimes.  Bring on the partisans of
                 all parties, I say.
                 \_ You know, it is hard to believe after Clinton and Bush,
                    but there used to be a time when it wasn't like this.
                    Presidents actually used to put members of the other
                    party on their cabinet and the qualifications of your
                    staff mattered at least as much as your loyalty.
                    \_ Ronald Reagan hired people who were highly
                       qualified and loyal. Ronald Reagan was GOD.  -GOP
                    \_ One word:  Bork.
                       \_ You know after Bork got 'Borked' he has spent the
                          last 20 years writing opinions and articles and
                          papers proving he is the extreme far right
                          nutcase everyone suspected he would be.
                          \_ Futher proof that smoking dope does not give
                             you some kind of liberal disease. Suck it,
                             Rush.
                          \_ But you're ok with extreme left wingers on the
                             court, yes?  Someone asked how we got this way.
                             The answer is the left viciously attacked Bork
                             on his beliefs not his legal skills as a judge.
                             The rest was history.
                             \_ My memory is not so hot.  Who was the last
                                extreme left winger on the court?  Also, Bork
                                \_ Still there now.
                                is a bad example for all of us on the motd.
                                He is/was/will continue to be totally
                                completely out in space.  I am 100 percent
                                glad he did not get confirmed.  I dont think
                                you'd want to live in a world either that has
                                him as a Justice.  Hey can we argue about
                                Clarence Thomas now?
                                \_ Whoop-dee-damn-doo.
                                \_ I didn't say you would like him.  I said
                                   where that sort of thing started in the
                                   modern era.
                             \_ Your history needs lots and lots of work.
                                Trying looking up "FDR, Supreme Court packing
                                of," "Johnson, Abe Fortas nomination," etc.
                                \_ Please join us when you can get on topic.
                                   Thanks.  You topic is interesting but
                                   unrelated.
                \_ I think clinton had a few republicans in his cabinet?
                   Lincoln's cabinet was kind of split, half always agreed
                   with him, the other half thought he sucked, but he insisted
                   they all stfu and press on with his agenda when he made
                   a decision (I'm talking about the emancipation).  I think
                   everyone thought Roosevelt was god.  I haven't read much
                   about Nixon's cabinet.  Isn't it funny how the Nixon
                   era seems like a delightful spring breeze now?
2007/10/5-7 [Uncategorized] UID:48244 Activity:nil
10/5    *snip!*
2007/10/5-9 [Computer/SW/OS/Linux] UID:48245 Activity:nil
10/5    Anyone used Veritas on Redhat?  I've used it on Solaris where it
        worked great but not on Redhat.  How well does it work?  Can it
        dynamically extend a pre-existing volume without unmounting?  Thanks!
2007/10/5-9 [Politics/Domestic/President/Bush] UID:48246 Activity:low 61%like:48252
10/4    It all depends on what the meaning of "torture" is:
        http://www.csua.org/u/jnr
        \_ Even the Red Cross calls it torture: http://www.csua.org/u/jnw
        \_ Even the Red Cross calls it torture:
           http://www.csua.org/u/jnw
2007/10/5-7 [Computer/Companies/Yahoo, Computer/SW/SpamAssassin] UID:48247 Activity:high
10/4    I stopped using Y! Mail because it was collecting a lot of spam.
        I switched to Gmail thinking Google's better. Now my Gmail's
        collecting as much spam as my Y! Mail, I'm beginning to realize
        that Google blows just as much as Yahoo. Is there a better FREE
        mailer out there I can use?  \_ whats your email addr? i'll tell
        the spammers to stop -shac \_ Is SpamGuard in your Yahoo Mail
        turned on?
           \_ If you're running the free version of Y! Mail (as opposed to
              one that comes with AT&T Yahoo or <DEAD>sbcglobal.net<DEAD>),
              SpamGuard doesn't seem to do jack. You can tag email as
              'Spam' but that has been a big joke since I *still* get
              spam no matter what.
        \_ whats your email addr? i'll tell the spammers to stop -shac
        \_ Is SpamGuard in your Yahoo Mail turned on?
           \_ If you're running the free version of Y! Mail (as opposed to
              one that comes with AT&T Yahoo or <DEAD>sbcglobal.net<DEAD>), SpamGuard
              doesn't seem to do jack. You can tag email as 'Spam' but that
              has been a big joke since I *still* get spam no matter what.
        \_ You can run, but you can't hide.
        \_ Sorry about the spam.  I get little to no spam at gmail.
        \_ I don't get spam at either one.  My Yahoo mail account is several
        \_ You can run, but you can't hide.  \_ Sorry about the spam.
        I get little to no spam at gmail.  \_ I don't get spam at
        either one.  My Yahoo mail account is several
           years old.  My gmail account is newer.
        \_ I get a lot of SPAM at Yahoo!, although it also catches a lot.
           I don't have GMAIL.

10/4
http://www.ixiqi.com/wp-content/uploads/2007/10/geekjewery42ap8.jpg
        <head>Great gift for your lady friend (or metrosexual
        friend)</head> \_ I don't think you know what metrosexual means
           \_ I don't think he knows what "great gift" means
        \_ These are more girly then they are metro.  I prefer the
        shirts with
           the body tag on front and back. -dans
2007/10/5-9 [Reference/History/WW2/Germany] UID:48248 Activity:moderate
10/5    Although each D-Day landing craft had a 2 men assigned as
        flamethrowers, most of them did not carry flamethrowers out of
        fear that they'd explode. I love the History Channel
                                                -not getting laid guy #3
        \_ Hey get your own nickname! - the original not getting laid guy.
           \_ Sorry I changed my login to not getting laid #3. Maybe
              we should start a loser club or something?
           \_ Hold on how un-laid are you?  I'm watching the history
              channel two. some SF freaks are talking about German
              jet engines.  awesome.  - original not getting laid guy.
              \_ hi I'm #3, I love the Weird Weapons of the Axis/Allies.
                 Jet engines are cool too. Go ME262, they kick ass!
                 Well actually they kind of sucked compared to the P-51
                 Mustangs, since ME262 had bad maneuverability, etc etc.
                 But hey, the idea's cool.
                 \_ And they run out of fuel after a few minutes and have to
                    glide back to base where upon American fighters just
                    pull in behind and shoot them down easily.  And they
                    required a difficult to produce and incredible toxic
                    fuel.  ME262 was cool.  For the Allies.  Hitler should
                    have let his generals run the war.  Fortunately, he was
                    insane and militarily untalented so the Allies were able
                    to win.
                    \_ Hitler was a micromanager. I hate micromanagers.
                    \_ The Allies would have beaten even the greatest military
                       genius in the world, because of economic might and
                       sheer numbers. Only a great politician could have
                       saved the Axis and Hitler, though a great German
                       leader, did not have enough international relations
                       skills to pull it off.
                       \_ If only he had kept the Jew scientists...
                       \_ Can't recall his name right now but the admiral in
                          charge of the german submarines wanted to wait until
                          they had 700+ before launching a war instead of the
                          100? or so they had.  Imagine how the war for the
                          atlantic would have gone with 700 subs or even 350
                          german subs roaming around?  We could not have
                          reinforced Britain, there likely would not have
                          been a dday, etc.  On the Russian front, he didn't
                          allow his generals to pull back to defensible
                          positions after they took ground so the Russian
                          counter attacks hurt a lot more than they should
                          have.  He didn't believe in strategic bombing.  He
                          didn't let his army reinforce the beaches at
                          Normandy until too late.  Need I go on?
                          \_ I am not saying Hitler didn't make mistakes. I
                             am saying that Germany would have lost anyway,
                             because they did not have the military might to
                             defeat Russia and the US. The war could have
                             gone on longer, but Germany would have lost
                             no matter who was advising them militarily.
                             However, with a better politician perhaps France
                             would still be speaking German.
        \_ My wife and I had sex again tonight. -happily married guy
           \_ Married a fatty, huh?
              \_ I'm guessing the pp didn't marry Asian, or is fresh
                 \_ No she is thin and asian. But we have only been dating
                    for seven years, so maybe you are right, things will
                    slow down after a while.
                    \_ Busty?
                       \_ Sorry, no.
2007/10/5-9 [Politics/Foreign/MiddleEast] UID:48249 Activity:low
10/5    http://tinyurl.com/2aahwq (pensacola news journal)
        "Police have said he arrived at the airport carrying a Dora the
         Explorer doll, hoop earrings and a jar of petroleum jelly."
        \_ I really, really didn't need to read this.
        \_ He has no regard to the girl's health.  He should've brought KY
           jelly instead of petroleum jelly.
                \_ Obviously he wasn't planning to use condoms ... What an
                   asshole.
Berkeley CSUA MOTD:2007:October:05 Friday <Thursday, Saturday>