| ||||||
| 2007/8/4-22 [Science/GlobalWarming] UID:47529 Activity:low |
8/4 http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/uk/science/article2195538.ece "Walking to shops damages planet more than going by car". You called me a troll when I brought up some of the things this article says. Have a nice day and next time drive, don't walk, if you want to go green. ;-) \_ Why do you waste our time with this crap? Some examples: (huh?) - Someone who installs a "green" lightbulb undoes a year's worth of energy-saving by buying two bags of imported veg, as so much carbon is wasted flying the food to Britain of energy-saving by buying two bags of imported veg, as so much carbon is wasted flying the food to Britain \_ ok fine. what do the concepts in the above 3 lines have anything to do with each other? can't you find a better piece than this, this article is making me dumber by existing. - Trees, regarded as shields against global warming because they absorb carbon, were found by German scientists to be major producers of methane, a much more harmful greenhouse gas absorb carbon, were found by German scientists to be major producers of methane, a much more harmful greenhouse gas \_ The German study may be incorrect as a Dutch study has failed to confirm the same: http://www.physorg.com/news96890121.html Who are you? Please kill yourself. \_ If you have a counter then please post it. If all you have to say is childish nonsense and more personal attack, then you can stop anytime. I was waiting for someone intelligent to reply, not a knee jerker. Have a nice day, friend. \_ He's suggesting that you produce a lot of carbon dioxide and that he'd like you to offset his own carbon production by ceasing your output. Sounds like a winnning solution. -!pp \_ Childish smearing: A good way to avoid any intelligent debate. As expected. \_ Who gets 100% of their calories from beef? What a silly "study." The obvious answer, which is later in the article, is to eat less meat and imported veggies. Also, live less then 3 miles from the store. Who lives that far from the store? Suburbanites? \_ Up until this July there wasn't a grocery store in downtown LA. \_ "180 calories to walk to the store. 150 calories to remain alive while sitting on the couch for the same time period. maybe we should all just die instead. tc, bogota, colombia" This comment on the "study" says it all. \_ Except it isn't 150 calories to sit on the couch or we'd all be starving. Here's some basic math on that number. Let's assume the poster meant 150 calories per hour to sit on the couch. 150 calories/hour X 24 hours = 3600 calories/day. Depending on how active you are 1800-2400 calories will maintain body weight. By this person's "says it all" comment, we'd all quickly starve to death on a normal diet just sitting on the couch. \_ Is someone talking? Can't you read? That comment said it all. \_ I read. Try some math. The comment was stupid. Try again. \_ If you sit on the couch 24hrs a day and not letting yourself fall asleep, yeah you'll quickly die. Anyway, a body awake burns more calories than a body asleep. \_ Trolling or just pedantic? \_ A sleeping body generates less heat. That's why you use a blanket when you sleep in order to not feel chilly and wake up. \_ Ok, and this changes the numbers how? At zero calories for 8 hours of sleep you're still burning 2400 calories/day if you burn 150/hour slacking on the couch the other 16. You'd still starve, just more slowly. And that's zero calories for sleeping which we know is too low but I'm taking the extreme case against my point for demonstration purposes. \_ What percentage of people who get all their calories from beef actually walk anywhere? |
| 2007/8/4-6 [Computer/SW/Languages/Misc, Reference/Religion] UID:47530 Activity:nil |
8/4 The real Da Vinci Code:
http://urltea.com/1536 (telegraph.co.uk) |
| 2007/8/4-22 [Academia/Berkeley] UID:47531 Activity:nil |
8/4 Q: What's the address of UC Berkeley? Assume that a person did not
know which department to send something to and they were trying to
route mail in a general sense. Thanks.
\_ Berkeley, CA 94720 |
| 2007/8/4-22 [Politics/Domestic/President/Bush, Politics/Foreign/MiddleEast/Iraq] UID:47532 Activity:nil |
8/4 O'Hanlan and Pollack rapidly backpedal from their op-ed
http://www.thecarpetbaggerreport.com/archives/11682.html
\_ Liberal media, my ass. |
| 2007/8/4 [Recreation/Pets] UID:47533 Activity:nil |
8/4 Hello, I think I've found a puppy mill and I'd like to report it
to the authority. How do I go about doing this? The mill/broker
is called Star Yorkie Kennel located in Encino, CA.
http://www.staryorkie.com/home.html
There are a few very obvious signs of an irresponsible breeder:
1) They specialize in tea-cups, in multiple breeds. I emailed
them about the lifespan of tea-cups (which is usually very
short), and they simply side-stepped the question. Good breeders
don't purposely breed tiny breeds, since they tend to have liver
problems, thyroid problems, and sickly puppies in general that end
up tiny. The average lifespan of a teacup is less than 5 years.
2) Their registry is KDF (Korean Dog Federation) instead of
AKC/Canadian CKC. I'm unable to find any references to KDF on the
web site, nor can I google for it. Sounds like a fake registry.
Good breeders use AKC or Canadian CKC.
3) They say we cannot see their parents (their FAQ says "they're in
Korea")-- good breeders are open and are happy to give you
physical addresses for inspection.
4) They take credit card and will ship the pet to you directly
without any question. Good breeders will ask you questions to make
sure their pups go to good homes.
5) "I have puppies available all the time", "Puppies are
available all the time." -- Good breeders take time to breed 1-3
litters a year, and take time to socialize pups up to 3-4 months.
How do I get the authority to investigate their business? Thanks.
\_ http://www.yorkietalk.com/forums/showthread.php?t=84519
Crooks they are.
\_ First and foremost, contact AKC. Look here for more help:
http://www.columbusdogconnection.com/ReportingPupMill.htm
\_ Check this out, they pretend that they're not breeders
http://www.nola.com/forums/animals/index.ssf?artid=167283 |
| 2007/8/4-6 [Finance, Finance/Investment] UID:47534 Activity:nil |
8/4 It's not easy being a mere single digit millionaire:
http://www.csua.org/u/j9u
\_ Obviously, we need to cut more tax. -Conservative
\_ I read that in the paper. Bunch of fucking whiners.
\_ This guy is an idiot. His house is paid and he has $2M. Maybe
I'd keep working if I was 31, but at 51 he needs to do
something he likes. If work is what he likes then fine, but
then admit that and don't complain about 12 hour days. The
article is full of suckers, which I think is the point. If the
guy cannot afford Hillsborough then maybe he should sell.
There's no honor in going bankrupt living a life you cannot
afford just because you were once worth $50M 10 years ago. |
| 2007/8/4-22 [Uncategorized] UID:47535 Activity:nil |
8/4 The worst bosses get promoted:
http://urltea.com/155l (news.yahoo.com)
\_ Likewise loud and obnoxious people get more recognition than
quiet worker bees. It's been like that since the dawn of
mankind. Nothing new. |