|
2007/7/20-22 [Computer/SW/Languages] UID:47350 Activity:nil |
7/20 Does anyone here know anything about the quality of the software product/programming team at a company called Permabit (http://www.permabit.com Are the brilliant hackers, goobers, or somewhere in between? Thanks. |
2007/7/20 [Reference/History/WW2/Germany] UID:47351 Activity:nil |
7/19 Hitler Hitler Hitler! |
2007/7/20-23 [Recreation/Dating] UID:47352 Activity:high |
7/20 I've concluded that both cats and dogs are stupid and are not worthy of my companionship. Is there a place to buy pet monkeys? I'd appreciate any info on monkey breeders. I only want to buy from ethical breeders and not evil monkey mills. Thanks! \_ http://www.petmonkey.info/testimonials.htm \_ Thanks for injecting a rare dose of reality into the motd. \_ Why not just have a child? \_ The condomless (aka it feels so much better without) guy is probably working on it right now. \_ Given I know someone who had a kid despite using both pills and condoms, I see cheer the condomless guy's desire to enjoy sex (assuming she's on the pill.) - guy forced to wear a condom \_ Asian women in general don't like taking pills, and are not as active or motivated by sex as Caucasians Are you by any chance dating an Asian? \_ This implies that any women that haven't been molested or are into drugs (or both, like strippers) are actually sexually active and/or motivated by sex. Women like sex for one reason: to have kids. \_ Plenty of women are motivated by sex. Just not sex with *you*. -tom \_ I disagree vehemently. Sex is a tool for women. Reason being: They can get laid whenever they want. Where's the excitement in that? It's about as exciting for them as jerking off is for men: fun when you're 13 but not so fun at 38. \_ I'm with tom on this one. It isn't about that they can get laid (but with *who* is an import- ant question), but that actually having sex is good if the sex is good. Maybe you need one of those 'sexual pleasure for dummies' books? Are you related to BDG? \_ BDG is a very wise man. Let me tell you, I'm a *guy* and I find sex boring these days. It was really fun at 18. Now, eh. Like roleplaying games and illicit drugs, its time has past. \_ I think they have pills for that now. \_ Find a new lover and get a book on better sex. BTW, there's more to sex than missionary + 30 seconds (you @18). \_ If you find sex boring, that explains why women don't want to have sex with you. -tom \_ "Women don't want to have sex with you" is your own proposition. with you" is your own assertion. I never said that. I said women aren't into sex except for procreation beyond the experimentation stage unless they are addicts or psycho. They might have sex. They might pretend to like it. They don't, except perhaps if it makes their man happy. I know this because I've heard a lot of women say it and they weren't talking about me when they said it. Tom, as a guy, wouldn't know anything other than what his doting wife told him to his face. \_ actually it was yer mom. -tom \_ Which explains why so many married women cheat? Because they hate sex and do it for their man? Ok. \_ Seriously, if someone had a kid while using pills and a condom I'd suspect intentional sabatoge. \_ I was gonna post this too. You can't really know that she was really on the pill. And... what if it's not his kid? Haha. \_ Those of you with kids have 6 months to get you and the kid tested and contest your fatherhood before you're stuck forever raising some red headed kid. The going rate for accidental discovery of mismatched blood types (usually discovered many years later for medical procedures) is about 10%. Contested rates are about 1/3rd. So, if there are 10 motd parents out there the odds are really good at least one of you is raising some other guy's kid. \_ uh, that's not what those stats mean. \_ It's exactly what they mean. \_ You're not forced to wear a condom. You chose your mate. \_ My wife doesn't want to go on the pill either. So now we just have anal all the time. |
2007/7/20 [Uncategorized] UID:47353 Activity:high |
7/20 hey dittoheads: you are losing. And still wrong. \_ I kind of doubt any motd posters are regular Limbaugh listeners, though I suppose a few of the more psycho pro-War Freeper types could be lurking. |
2007/7/20-21 [Uncategorized] UID:47354 Activity:nil |
7/20 I think this ends with a 12 minute shot of the guy urinating http://www.171starbucks.com \_ Dear god that man is annoying. |
2007/7/20-22 [Computer/SW/Languages/C_Cplusplus] UID:47355 Activity:nil |
7/20 I was handed a templeted code that builds with gcc3.3.3 but not 3.4.4. I'm not all that hot with templetes, so I'm having trouble figuring out what's wrong. The error I get is: TxBoundedFunctor.cpp:29: error: `template<class RetType, class ArgType> class TxFunctorBase' used without template parameters where TxBoundedFunctor extends TXFunctor extents TxFunctorBase. Like so: // Constructor specifying the pointer to a functor and the dimension. template <class RetType, class VecType> TxBoundedFunctor<RetType, VecType>:: TxBoundedFunctor(size_t dim) : TxFunctor<RetType, VecType>(dim), TxBounds<VecType>(dim) { TxFunctorBase::className += ":TxBoundedFunctor"; } Any idea why it won't build with 3.4.4, but will in 3.3.3? \_ First, it's "template" not "templete". Second, can you post the code to a public file so we don't have to parse it from the motd and guess what comes before it? \_ Note: this is called a 'pastebin' Third, you're never able to get away with dropping template arguments, and it's most likely that GCC dropped a nonconforming extension. Checking the release notes for 3.4: http://gcc.gnu.org/gcc-3.4/changes.html#cplusplus G++ is now much closer to full conformance to the ISO/ANSI C++ standard. This means, among other things, that a lot of invalid constructs which used to be accepted in previous versions will now be rejected. It is very likely that existing C++ code will need to be fixed. This document lists some of the most common issues. Here it is: In a template definition, unqualified names will no longer find members of a dependent base (as specified by [temp.dep]/3 in the C++ standard). members of a dependent base (as specified by [temp.dep]/3 in the C++ standard). \_ That appears to be it, thanks. Prefixing with this-> works. |
2007/7/20-21 [Recreation/Media] UID:47356 Activity:low 50%like:47320 |
7/20 Rejected Harry Potter Endings: http://www.geekculture.com/joyoftech/joyimages/987.gif \_ Can I get the 30 seconds of my life back that it took me to paste this worthless link into a browser and read it? ok tnx. \_ What inspired you to read it anyway? |
2007/7/20-22 [Uncategorized] UID:47357 Activity:nil |
7/20 Visit Dante's Inferno In 2d Life: http://slambling.blogspot.com/2007/07/als-inferno.html |
2007/7/20-21 [Uncategorized] UID:47358 Activity:nil |
7/20 4.2 Quake just north of 13 @ 0440. Woke me right up. --erikred |
2007/7/20 [Reference/History/WW2/Germany] UID:47359 Activity:nil |
7/19 AVENGING MOTD GOD PRONOUNCES CLASSIFIES THIS THREAD AS RETARDED: Hitler Hitler Hitler! |
2007/7/20-26 [Politics/Foreign/Asia/Japan, Reference/History/WW2/Japan] UID:47360 Activity:kinda low |
7/20 Anyone here ever work with a Japanese organization? I find it very frustrating! At least with the firm we deal with, although I am sure they are very bright based on their achievements, they are constantly making small mistakes. Their first course of action is always to blame us first! Not once has the error ever been on our side once tracked down and yet they always blame us first! And we can't tell them that because it would be disrespectful to do so. In fact, we have to tell our senior managers to tell their senior managers because direct assignment of blame (i.e. your guys screwed up) is a no-no, too. I am frustrated with their way of doing business and I find it adversarial, which wouldn't be so bad if they weren't the ones always screwing things up and then trying to call us on it. \_ why give them respect if they don't desever it. let them commit sepaku \_ Make sure you learn the phrase "Gama Su!, Gama Su!" Seriously, this is a free market. You don't have to put up with bullshit like this. Switch to another provider/partner. That is the beauty of our efficient free market economy. \_ Leave messages around saying "You will be crushed by China" \_ Which Japanese comapny is that? \_ This almost seems like a troll to me, as it appears that the op has had to deal with only one firm. But regardless: isn't this how every company/group is? Playing the passing-the-blame game? \_ Not if it's clearly never our problem. If they spent time diagnosing it before quickly calling us right away they would find the problem themselves. That is, they always find the problem themselves, but not before calling us to blame us first. It's the cultural thing that bugs me. We can't say "Not our problem. Check out your end." because it is disrespectful, but they seem to have no problem telling us "Please check things out on your end." My management got mad at me because their management was upset that we told them that the problem was theirs. I was told "You are 100% correct, but you can't do that in Japan. You have to tell your senior, senior management (way far out of the loop) who will relay it to their senior management and then back down to people at your level." Is that true or is that a load of crap? If that's the way they do business it's a wonder they can accomplish anything. There's also a doublestandard, because their engineers have no problems telling us the problem must be ours even when it never is. \_ If they blame you directly, blame them directly. Who cares about the consequences. Why is it you that has to adapt to their customs and not the other way around? \_ I hope with the global economy we have, that this is not a widespread case and this company/group is just trying to use the "stupid Americans who don't understand our culture" as an unfair leverage to themselves. I only know one person who works with a Japanese company on regular basis, and the only complaint he has is how much he is forced to drink whenever he has to have a meeting with them. Of course, he is Asian, so they may treat him differently. It's also possible that your manager or his/her manager IS a "stupid American..." and blowing things out of proportion. Also, is this venture an equal partner venture, or is one company benefitting more from the other? I am not a Japanese, but I wouldn't expect to have to worry about culture gap/respect issue to come into play at engineer level. Maybe the guy you "offended" is sleeping with his company exec's daughter or something. But I still wouldn't blanket the statement to cover the Japanese as a whole if you've only dealt with this one firm. \_ The Japanese are benefitting by this arrangement far more than we are. Also, the reason I used a blanket statement is that other people at work (my management) who deal with the Japanese claim that it's endemic to Japanese culture. I have no experience otherwise, hence my question if anyone else has experience with working with the Japanese. \_ If you think that is bad, get Sun, EMC and Veritas in one room together and get them to agree who is responsible for an outage... \_ Or Oracle, Sun, and Veritas. \_ Just to be clear: this is not endemic to all Japanese companies, nor is it unique to Japanese companies. Unless this company is a make-or-break client, screw cultural sensitivity and call them on it. --erikred |
2007/7/20 [Politics/Domestic/President/Bush] UID:47361 Activity:nil |
7/20 Quick! You're Dick Cheney and you get to be "preznint" for only a few hours while Bush has a colonoscopy. What do you do?! http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20070720/ap_on_go_pr_wh/bush_colonoscopy \_ Kill a man on live tv and then claim executive privilege \_ Bush, Dick, Colin -- The White House Sex Trio. |
2007/7/20-26 [Recreation/Dating] UID:47362 Activity:low |
7/20 Is there a difference between a regular X rated movie vs. a XXX rated movie? Does XX exist? Does the number of X increase the level of eroticism? <<<<<<< Other Changes Below \_ 'X' ratings are purely a construct of the adult entertainment industry. \_ XX is BUSHCO's ass inspection. \_ None of them 'exist' officially. Officially, there is no 'X'. ======= \_ I was told this by a female friend: X is softcore, XXX actually shows the penetration and beyond. I forget what XX summarized to. But accoring to wikipedia, these ratings are not governed or accepted by an organization and the porn maker can put how many ever Xs they want. >>>>>>> Your Changes Above \_ Given that R can show almost anything except penetration, how does your friend figure X is the same thing? The letter doesn't mean anything. There is no ratings board for porn so they just slap a few X's on everything. \_ What would a chick know about this? \_ A bit more than the motd poster. Maybe you're hanging out with the right/wrong chicks? |
2007/7/20-26 [Politics/Domestic/Crime] UID:47363 Activity:low |
7/20 "Marine spared prison time in Iraqi death" http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20070720/ap_on_re_us/marines_iraq_shooting Wow! What justice is that? \_ Which part are you talking about? \_ The part that he doesn't even go to prison after a murder. \_ You skipped that part where they dropped the murder charge, huh? So it wasn't murder. At least read your own links before posting, please. \_ you're begging the question \_ Enlighten me. The court decided he wasn't a murderer so he didn't get the penalty for murder. And? Are you one of the people who think Libby is a liar solely based on the fact that he was convicted of it despite all facts to the contrary? Hope not, it would be so disheartening to think there were hypocrites on the motd. ;-) \_ please describe your parameters |
2007/7/20-21 [Academia/Berkeley/CSUA/Motd] UID:47364 Activity:nil |
7/20 Tell us about Chico jrleek! Is it safe from evil liburals and homeless people? \_ MOTD quiz! Is this the most pathetic troll in the history of the MOTD? Yes: . No: No, there's too much competition: . |
2007/7/20-21 [Uncategorized] UID:47365 Activity:nil |
7/20 tom, please stop deleting my posts. Asshole. \_ The only post I deleted today was the one from erikred, after he emailed me. Asshole. -tom |
2007/7/20-21 [Politics/Domestic/Gay] UID:47366 Activity:low |
7/20 http://www.thespoof.com/news/spoof.cfm?headline=s2i21827 Top gay names. \- This was stupid. Although they mention Rick, they did not mention Mark and (especially) Steve. |
2007/7/20-23 [Politics/Domestic/California] UID:47367 Activity:nil |
7/20 How the great state of CA has been stealing from people for decades: http://csua.org/u/j72 \_ SOMEONE GET HOWARD JARVIS ON THIS RIGHT NOW!!!!1!!1!111 \_ But, but, but, the CA state legislature are Democrats! |
3/14 |