| WIKI | FAQ | Tech FAQ | |
 http://csua.com/feed/ | |
| ||||||
| 2007/3/21-26 [Reference/Religion] UID:46037 Activity:low |
3/21 http://www.google.com/search?q=my+religious+rights http://search.yahoo.com/search?p=my+religious+rights Click on My Religious Rights. "For more than 80 years, the ACLU and its allies have attempted to eliminate public expression of our nation's faith and heritage. They have done this through fear, intimidation, disinformation, and the filing of lawsuits (or threats of lawsuits)." \_ Good to see that the $1000 I gave the ACLU last year has helped them to be effective. I will remember and give them that amount again. Thanks, I had almost forgotten. \_ I'm glad all the KKK members they help defend, and all the poor cities they sued to remove "religious" symbols and monikers from surely helped the people in general. Do they even know what the word Sacramento means? What about one of their bastions? Los Angeles. ACLU is the best sign you don't needs enemies abroad. What about one of their bastions? Los Angeles. ACLU is the best sign you don't needs enemies abroad. \_ Don't forget all the Neo-Nazis whose 1st amendment rights they helped to protect. Of course, the ACLU occasionally gets something right, but usually that is completely by accident, like when Inspector Gadget foils Dr. Claw's plans w/o help from Penny and Brain. \- aclu membership and contributions took a hit after the skokie case. \_ Quite seriously, I think the ACLU gets it right all the time, with the exception of their stance on 2nd Amendment gun ownership rights. They are the main group that has blocked government censorship of the Internet and they have stood up for the free speech rights of unpopular minorities (your Neo-Nazis for instance) again and again. That is what America is all about to me. Freedom. -$1000/yr ACLU donor \_ With biological warfare available to these monsters -- the Husseins, the Bin Ladens, the Arafats -- what we saw on Tuesday, as terrible as it is, could be minuscule if, in fact God continues to lift the curtain and allow the enemies of America to give us probably what we deserve....The abortionists have got to bear some burden for this because God will not be mocked....I really believe that the pagans, and the abortionists, and the feminists, and the gays and the lesbians who are actively trying to make that an alternative lifestyle, the ACLU, People For the American Way -- all of them who have tried to secularize America -- I point the finger in their face and say, "you helped this happen." \_ Who gave Rev. Faldwell an account? |
| 2007/3/21-24 [Politics/Domestic/President/Clinton, Politics/Domestic/President/Bush] UID:46038 Activity:nil |
3/20 Tom DeLay, moral center of the Republican Party:
http://www.csua.org/u/ia2 |
| 2007/3/21-26 [Reference/Law/Court, Politics/Domestic/Election] UID:46039 Activity:nil |
3/21 One of the fired US Attorney's tells his side of the story:
http://www.nytimes.com/2007/03/21/opinion/21iglesias.html |
| 2007/3/21-26 [Politics/Domestic/President/Clinton, Politics/Domestic/President/Bush] UID:46040 Activity:low |
3/21 Once again Dems are pussies. Gore first got the Senate to waive the 48
hour rule (receiving written copy of testimony 48 hrs before hearing)
for a 24 hour rule. Then he failed to submit his testimony until this
morning, a few hours before the hearing. Oh, and then the Dems got it
hours before the Repubs.
http://csua.org/u/ia3 (cnsnews.com)
\_ At a time when the President is vowing to fight congressional
subpoenas up to the ussc, it's funny that you hold this up as
"news".
\_ Wow, if only I had a forum for my slanted view of the world; wait,
that's what the Internet is for! And if I call it News, it must be
so!
\_ So are you saying that Gore *did* submit his testimony before
this morning? -op
\_ I'm saying that a gossipy slagfest is not a news source.
\_ So is senate.gov good enough for you? http://csua.org/u/ia4
\_ What you mean is, is Senator Inhofe's blog good enough for
me? And even more to the point, is a staffer on Inhofe's
blog good enough for me? And the answer is, not without
further corroboration. But WAIT! It gets better: Marc
Morano, the source in question, was "previously known as
Rush Limbaugh's 'Man in Washington,' as reporter and
producer for the Rush Limbaugh Television Show."
http://www.sourcewatch.org/index.php?title=Marc_Morano
Please, if you're going to post stooges, at least include
Larry, Moe, and Curly.
\_ I'm fascinated by the refusal to accept reporting of fact
simpy because of the name Limbaugh. I can understand your
not accepting his analysis perhaps, but the basic facts?
-emarkp
\_ Much like we trusted the Bush Administration's report
on the "fact" that Saddam had WMD? I can't fault this
guy for not accepting some politico's "facts". --PeterM
\_ Wow, this is such a red herring.
\_ You do know the difference between an intelligence
report and reporting a fact that has occurred in
front of witnesses and will be a part of the senate
record, right? -emarkp
\_ There's reporting of fact and there's stirring shit
up. If the source is a known shit-stirrer, anything
the source reports is automatically suspect, esp. if
it is, on its face, true, because there's plenty of
reason to believe that it's only being reported to
stir up more shit. If I report that the sky is
blue, that's true; if I report that the sky is blue
despite claims that Global Warming is going to
result in smog smog smog, that is also true, but
it's presented in a way that makes GW seem like a
myth. Your professional shit-stirrers, like Mark
Morano, do this for a living, and sifting nuggets of
truth from the shit that they're stirring up is
about as reqarding as actually sifting through
feces for gold.
\_ http://csua.org/u/ia6
LA Times quotes Joe Barton as saying the they
didn't receive his written testimony more than 2
hours before the hearing. Is that a lefty source
enough for you? -emarkp
\_ "lefty enough" is the level of immaturity that
I expect from shit-stirrers, emarkp, not you.
\_ When a dog craps on the floor, you rub his
nose in it. Same for these nutjobs. -emarkp
\_ The only nutjobs I see here are the ones
that think a slagfest from a propaganda
hack constitutes a real news source.
\_ Oh, so a senator's office stating
what's happening in the Senate TODAY
is a nutjob? Go back to your hole
anonymous nutjob. -emarkp
\_ If you're trying to defend someone
from being called a nutjob, Inhofe
is just about the most difficult
defendant.
\_ So you don't like his politics
so he's a nutjob and what his
boy reported on his Senate
blog is suspect? Tin foil and
blinders. Better than plastic.
I'm going to be rich.
\_ Read who posted the account. It's
Mark Morano, a hack. That Inhofe
is letting him use his blog is
simply shameful. --erikred
\- how could you be unaware
inhofe is shameless.
\_ The irony of my shame in
needing to be reminded of
this is not lost on me,
Partha. --erikred
\_ LA Times leans right, now, when it used to
be a neutral reporter of facts, which is
why I cancelled my subscription last year.
\_ Haha. I don't know about now, but 8 years
ago the LA Times could out do the Cron on
lefty bias. I assume what you mean is,
"The LA times used to agree with me."
\_ Perhaps this is a confusion of Pro-
Israel (as LAT seems to be) with either
the right or the left.
\_ Unless reported by dailykos, http://moveon.org, or some other
neutral and unbiased site, it doesn't count. Having to
respond to factual statements is annoying. It is much
easier to just say 'neener! it never happened because
your source is biased! nyah!'
\_ Desperate attempt to change the subject. Won't work, America
has woken up to Roveian tactics and is mostly immune right now. |
| 2007/3/21-22 [Uncategorized] UID:46041 Activity:kinda low |
3/21 Divergent selection found in asexual reproducers:
http://www.physorg.com/news93597385.html
\_ What does "species" mean when you're referring to
creatures which produce asexually?
\_ Reading http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Species it's probably
still undefined. |
| 2007/3/21 [Computer/SW/WWW/Browsers] UID:46042 Activity:nil |
3/21 Firefox 2.0.0.3 is out:
http://www.mozilla.com/en-US/firefox/2.0.0.3/releasenotes |
| 2007/3/21 [Computer/SW/Languages] UID:46043 Activity:moderate |
3/21 I just saw a double penetration XXX video for the very first time
and it is sick sick sick. I completely understand the humor
behind goatse where it is so dumb that no one in the world could
possible enjoy that stuff. Double penetration however is another
story and people actually like that kind of crap? I don't
understand what kind of sicko would find anal penetration appealing.
It stinks and is unsanitary. Secondly, I don't understand
why two men would ever want to double penetrate a vagina since
you're going to touch each other's penis and share fluids. Like
anal sex it is disgusting and unsanitary. I can't believe how
much crap there is on the internet, and why people like that stuff.
\_ them's what makes horse races. (no pun intended) |
| 2007/3/21 [Uncategorized/Profanity] UID:46044 Activity:nil |
3/21 pussy dick shit
I want to see how long this post lasts before emarkp deletes it.
\_ crap? Ass? schlong? gazongas? |
| 2007/3/21-26 [Uncategorized] UID:46045 Activity:nil |
3/21 In light of this Friday's release of TMNT:
http://imgs.xkcd.com/comics/ninja_turtles.png
\_ I'm easily amused, but: http://www.xkcd.com/c5.html |
| 2007/3/21-26 [Politics/Domestic/Crime, Politics/Domestic/President] UID:46046 Activity:nil |
3/21 Has anyone seen a transcript of the Gore hearing today? I checked
on cspan, cnn, google, epw.senate.gov, and a few other places. I can
find video but not text. Video is a no-go. Thanks.
\_ I'm hunting for Boxer's smackdown of Inhofe. Whether or not he's
a nutjob (and boy is he), he's one bitter motherfucker.
link:preview.tinyurl.com/yuz478 (thinkprogress.org)
http://thinkprogress.org/wp-content/plugins/flvplayer.swf?file=http://images1.americanprogress.org/il80web20037/ThinkProgress/flv/2007/03/goreinhofe.320.240.flv
\_ Gore sure is a hypocrite, but it is nice to see Boxer find
her backbone.
\- I am not a big fan of ALGOR, I certainly argued with a
fair number of knee jerk liberal aquaintances that he is
a hypocrite when it comes to his personal energy use and the
"i pay my way out of it" excuses nothing, but I believe that
issue has no place in the "senate environment cmte hearings
on global climate change". on a crossfire type talk show
you can bring up stuff like this, or william bennett being
a gambling addict, or ted kennedy being a hypocrite and
murderer, but it's not approproate here. although i dont
know how to have shut him down except another republican
saying something (and they never do .. witness TEED "the
hulk" STEVENS). on the other hand, maybe everytime
dick "i had other plans" cheney opens his mouth about iraq
we should call him on his elaborate moves to avoid war
service. but some of te mediocrities like TEED STEVENS
and INHOFE being in the senate is just unreal. it speaks
to the power of "reptilian intelligence" and low cunning. |