| ||||||
| 2006/11/8-9 [Politics/Domestic/President/Bush] UID:45251 Activity:low |
11/8 Rumor is Cheney may/will leave for Saudi Arabia if the Democrats
win the Senate, just in case they try to get him.
\_ Neither Cheney nor Bush has anything to worry about,
impeachment wise, 'cause the senate is not democratic
enough. Unless some really stinky shit comes out.
\_ "Stinky shit?" Oh, you mean like Abu Ghraib? You mean like
holding people prisoner for years without charging them? You
mean like wiretapping one's own citizens? You mean like
invading a country under false pretenses? You mean like
revealing the identity of a CIA agent as a form of political
retaliation against her husband? That sort of thing?
\_ None of that shit is stinky in the noses of the Senate
Republicans. There will be no impeachment unless Bush/Cheney
is shown to have had gay sex for money, irrefutable
evidence of bribe-taking, etc.
\_ None of that shit is stinky in the noses of Senate
Republicans. It'll take irrefutable evidence of Bush/
Dick taking bribes, having gay sex for money, or something
like that. Civil rights violations, or anything done
to "terrorists", aren't going to bring them down.
\_ Bill Clinton was impeached for much, much less. He got
impeached for getting blowjobs where he never even
climaxed. Bush (or Karl Rove) betrayed the entire CIA
by revealing Valerie Plame's identity. Civil rights
violations to brown people might not bring the Bush
Administration honkeys down, but the CIA fiasco may.
\_ You know, I really hope you're right. I think
Bush and Cheney both deserve impeachment for this
and for war crimes and everything you mentioned.
However, I do not see it happening.
\_ second that. I would swear my alegience to a
president who lied about a blowjob over a president
who lied about war anyday. Then again, I think
majority of population don't have that sense of
proportion.
\_ I heard that jackass actually went hunting on Election Day. This
was apparently the first that DICK had gone hunting since he shot
his boy in the face.
\_ You have been trolled. |
| 2006/11/8 [Academia/Berkeley/CSUA/Troll/Jblack] UID:45252 Activity:nil |
11/7 Waiting for jblack to saying something about the election
\_ congratulations to the party of "the tribe", your team
did pretty well. |
| 2006/11/8 [Politics/Domestic/Election] UID:45253 Activity:nil |
11/8 Santorum announces will run for President in 2008.
\_ How better to bounce back from a large margin defeat?
\_ That should provide some nice comedy until the New Hampshire
primary and Iowa caucus.
\_ You have been trolled. |
| 2006/11/8 [Politics/Domestic/California/Arnold] UID:45254 Activity:kinda low |
11/7 The Gropenator wins over Angelides. I told you. People prefer
jocks over nerds.
\_ well, I can't think of a single major newspaper that didn't
endorse the gropinator. then again, control of the editorial page
at the l.a. times was conveniently moved from news to management
in time for the election, and the top two existing guys have
been fired.
\_ The margin was closer than expected. Arnold 49%. Phil 46.2%.
\_ The margin was closer than expected. Arnold 55.8%. Phil 39.2%.
Phil only lost by 16.6%. LOL! Harvard loses out to steroids.
\_ "What a fantastic evening; I love doing sequels," Schwarzenegger
told supporters in Beverly Hills. "But this without any doubt is my
favorite sequel." http://www.csua.org/u/heo |
| 2006/11/8 [Politics/Domestic] UID:45255 Activity:nil |
11/8 DEMOCRATS TAKE THE SENATE DEMOCRATS TAKE THE SENATE!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
\_ Of course. All the idiots on the motd the last few months
talking up an "October surprise" and "November surprise" was
just a lot of hot air. Gee, imagine that. The motd was filled
with idiots who had no idea what they were talking about.
Shocker.
\_ The November surprise was the Saddam conviction. It just
didn't work. It might have saved a few House seats for the GOP. |
| 2006/11/8 [Uncategorized] UID:45256 Activity:moderate |
11/7 First woman Speaker of the House! Hooray for womenkind!!!
\_ So if Dick has a heart attack and GWB has a bicycle accident,
we'd have her as a President? Dear lord...
\_ Nancy isn't a bad looking 66-year old. I can tell that she was
probably pretty hot as a young woman. Not surprising at all that
her investment banker husband impregnated her 4 times.
\_ Funny I was going to say the same thing on motd. I wouldn't
mind jerking off to pictures of her when she was younger.
\_ You need a girlfriend badly.
\_ He can try http://csua/~jean
\_ Anyone got pics of Nancy Pelosi as a young woman? URL?
\_ Busty Pelosi:
<DEAD>www.wyolife.com/kerryfest/WHAT'S-HER-FACE.gif<DEAD>
\_ She has nice big brown eyes. |
| 2006/11/8 [Uncategorized] UID:45257 Activity:nil |
11/7 Where's Election Swami? Let the mocking begin.
\_ He's busy hiding under his red-colored blanket. |
| 2006/11/8 [Politics/Domestic/President/Bush] UID:45258 Activity:low |
11/7 Wow, check out the Democratic party imploding! My goodness!
\_ Agreed. The only reason Ds won is because of GWB. This will
be a one time victory in many years to come because there will
not be another GWB after 2008.
\_ 2008 belongs to the Dems. The Dems have control of the state
governorships now, so expect some creative gerrymandering and
control of battleground state campaigning.
\- i am kinda curious if any loose canon democrats are
going to go "beyond the pale" to "get even".
\_ Pelosi should just slit her wrists...
\_ I bet you can find some choice quotes in the motd archive.
\_ http://csua.com/2006/10/18/#44863 |
| 2006/11/8 [Politics/Domestic/California] UID:45259 Activity:nil |
11/7 Webb up to almost 12,000 votes ahead, getting really tough for a
recount...
\_ Back down to a little over 7,000. Still, Webb is going to win this
one. Last year, Virginia had a re-count for a state attorney
general race. 323 vote margin. After the re-count, it went up to
a 360 vote margin. So don't expect George Allen to be able to make
up a freaking 7,000+ vote margin. That's what you get for calling
psb's relative a macaca.
\- i'm not worried about george allen making up a 7k vote margin.
i am worried about karl rove making up 7000 votes.
see http://www.theatlantic.com/doc/200411/green etc. --psb |
| 2006/11/8-10 [Politics/Domestic/President/Clinton, Politics/Domestic/RepublicanMedia] UID:45260 Activity:moderate |
11/8 FoxNews (cable) keeps showing Schwartzegenner's victory party
and not really covering the rest of the election. What's up?
\_ One red spot in an ocean of blue?
\_ I bet you think politics (or got interested) in politics
after Clinton.
\_ Actually I was interested in politics before Clinton
and then I graduated from high school and grew up.
\_ Bah. The Governator is pretty damned liberal for a republican.
A popular centrist getting elected isn't much of a story.
\_ Yet our politics are so partisan. What the Dems should learn
from this election is that being a far left/right idealoge is
a recipe for failure. Unfortunatly, with Pelosi as speaker of
the house...
\_ I can't stand Pelosi. Why give her and her nutjob status
such power? As you say, someone more moderate would be
better.
\_ Pelosi is not a nutjob, unless you define nutjob as
anyone that Rush Limbaugh doesn't like. She is actually
pretty much in the middle of the Democratic Party:
\_ Pelosi is about in the middle of the Democratic Party.
It says much about you and your extremism, that you
consider her a "nutjob".
http://www.csua.org/u/hen
\- i dont know much about pelosi but so far like her
more than i like hillary, or ALGOR ... but right now
i woudl settle for somebody who didnt torture people,
invade countries on false intelligence, appoint
partisan hacks to formerly technocratic civil
service positions, think religion has equal footing
with science as a way to understand the world,
and has some respect for article 1 and artcile 3 of the
constitution, and doesnt think governing is about
sloganeering [cut and run, change hourse midstream,
"i am a constituional orginalist" etc], drag us toward
plutocracy ... i can live with some differences on
immigration policy or afformative action etc.
\_ "But the Democratic caucus has gone so far to the
left that, hell, she's in the middle." She has a
95 ADA rating. No, she's not a moderate at all.
Maybe compared to a communist.
\_ You aren't paying attention. I did not say that
she is a moderate: there are almost no moderates
left, in either party. I am saying that she is
about in the middle of the Democratic Party.
She is as far left as Frist or Hastert are Right.
Do you call these two gentlemen "nutjobs"?
http://www.csua.org/u/heu
\_ Being in the middle of a bunch of ultra leftists
does make her an ultra leftist nutjob.
\_ So you think anyone who doesn't want to suck
George Bush's dick and lick Bill O'Reilly's
ass is a leftist extremist or "ultra leftist"
or whatever it is you want to call us?
\_ isn't an ultra-leftist a communist?
\_ no. not necessarily.
they are self-evidently not communists.
\_ not in name.
ergo they are not ultra leftists.
\_ no. not necessarily.
ergo ppp is a moron.
\_ work on your logic and reading comp.
\_ I actually feel sorry for Lincon Chaffe...
\_ don't. the senate GOP has been voting like robots, and
chafee was never the difference. |
| 2006/11/8-9 [Politics/Domestic] UID:45261 Activity:nil |
11/8 I think it's really great that Dems are emphasizing bipartisanship
in their victory speeches - that there was a divided America, and in
order to defeat terrorism, we would need to work together. I feel
really good about this election.
\- assming the Rs hold on to the Senate, I think te play between
the two chambers will be itneresting ... sort of a "if you
are total assholes [nuclear option etc] then we at least
have some scope to respond."
\_ Democrats take Senate. Wonder what will happen to Lieberman?
\_ url?
\- nothing will happen to lieberman. Harry Reid already
said that. if the margin was large, he might be able to
reneg, but it wont be, and also harder to reneg on
something that is sort of public.
\_ As of 8:34am MST it's not quite a done deal, but it looks
like the Democrats got both Montana and Virginia,
thus winning a Senate majority.
http://www.cnn.com/ELECTION/2006/pages/results/senate |
| 2006/11/8-9 [Reference/Tax] UID:45262 Activity:moderate |
11/8 Oh great... all the measures and all the propositions passed.
Urge to kill... rising.
\_ Oh, you were in favor of letting convicted child molesters live
near elementary schools?
\_ Thank you to all the urban areas that exported their child
molesters to rural areas! We really appreciate it. Now where
did I put that shotgun?
\_ I'm opposed to making these people wear a GPS for life.
That's ridiculous. Are we not even pretending to rehab
people anymore? If you're a teacher and boff a 17 year old
student then you wear a tracking device for life?
\_ For me, this depends on what genders you and your student
are. I'll scream either "Rape!" or "Hot!" accordingly.
\_ I guess my point is that if these people are still so
dangerous that they need 24/7 monitoring then maybe
we should not let them out. However, I think this law
is mostly based on hysteria. I am fine with most of
the bill, but not the monitoring. It seems like a
violation of civil rights, very Orwellian, and EXPENSIVE.
\_ Regarding that prop, I believe it adds a lot of expense for
no actual safety benefit. Plus I agree with the above poster
that it's an appeal to emotion and hysteria. Every semi-urban
area is reasonably close to a school and/or children. Why are
you in favor of letting convicted child molesters live?
\_ Exactly. Shouldn't we also be tracking anyone with
a felony conviction then? I'm more concerned about
violent criminals with long rap sheets. I'm concerned
about molesters, too, but why single them out?
\_ except all those that you know, didn't
\_ sorry I saw stuff yesterday projecting them all winning, but
the bonds are still bad.
\_ Who cares. Only the bond measures passed. The tax measures like
the stupid added parcel tax failed. Good.
the stupid added parcel tax and the ridiculous cigarette tax all
failed. Good.
\_ Do you know how much the passed bonds will add to our annual debt
service?
\_ ^^^
\_ ~2.8b in payments every year. |
| 2006/11/8-9 [Computer/SW/Security] UID:45263 Activity:nil |
11/8 OpenSSH 4.5 is out:
http://www.openssh.org/txt/release-4.5
ftp://ftp.openbsd.org/pub/OpenBSD/OpenSSH/openssh-4.5.tar.gz
ftp://ftp.openbsd.org/pub/OpenBSD/OpenSSH/portable/openssh-4.5p1.tar.gz |
| 2006/11/8-10 [Recreation/Computer/Games] UID:45264 Activity:kinda low |
11/8 What stops this from happening? JoeL decides he wants more than his
seniority and chair position. He wants to be majority leader and have
final say about what goes into every senate bill or he'll caucus with
the R and switch control back.
\- because then some marginal R might switch to D in return for other
privilages. when yoyu have this knife edge balance, this is a
real problem. it is a problem in parliamentar systems, it was
privilages. when you have this knife edge balance, this is a
real problem. it is a problem in parliamentary systems, it was
a problem when JEEM JEFFORDS switched ... it's also a generic
economic problem [look for "hold out problem"].
economic problem [look for "hold out problem"]. insitutions
deal with or mitigate them in various way ... usually by
evolving norms or agreeing to bylaws and such.
\_ What marginal r? Joe isn't a D. He can do what he wants and
go where he'll get the best deal. That's how politics works.
There are no bylaws or agreements in place to stop this.
[hey thanks whoever over wrote this, please dont]
\_ i hate JoeL mostly because he torpedoed the GAAP and other
financial reforms right after Enron. sigh...
\_ He was also one of the leaders of "OMG violent video games! Won't
someone please THINK OF THE CHILDREN!"
\_ I lost respect for Hillary over that, too. Not just because
it's knee-jerk and reactionary, but because it shows they
aren't in touch with modern America... who plays video games..
aren't in touch with modern America... who play video games..
as ADULTS.
\_ Not too many people over 30 are playing games as
adults. I know a few, but they are freaks. This is
definitely not the norm for 'modern America'.
\_ Average gamer age is over 30 last I heard.
\_ I read something a while ago that "average gamer
age" is skewed by all the Madden/whatever sports
game players, who don't consider themselves
"gamers". I mean, it's just sports, right? -John
\_ What defines a 'gamer'? If I play Playstation
5x per year does that make me a 'gamer'?
\_ Playing video games.
\_ Yes, but how often? If I play once per
year am I a gamer? That's about how much
I play. I don't consider myself a gamer
based on that.
\_ No, no - you're a gamer you freakin'
cheese-eating, non-wife-screwing, slacker,
kids-ignoring, Everquest-playing zombie!
MOTD told you so!
\_ a) how'd you pick "over 30".. why not "over 18"?
b) there's this (very, very wrong) mentality that only
kids play video games. it's like saying "let's put
restrictions on the (book) publishing industry because
restrictions on the (book) publishing industry b/c
lots of kids read books"
\_ It's not that adult should not play games, it's
that adults generally don't have the time.
Those who make the time are generally
shirking responsibilities. All of the wives
of gamers I know are none too happy about it,
except for the couple of wives who play, too.
Is it worth getting a divorce over? Do you
want to miss playing with your kids because
your Everquest pals are going on a quest?
Whenever I play games I feel like I am
wasting my time. Sure, I waste time in Vegas
once per year, too - and that's about how
often I play video games.
often I play video games. I feel the same way
about, say, people who watch too much TV. If
you are spending more than a couple hours per
week playing games/watching TV/whatever then
you are not a very productive adult. There
does come a time to 'grow up'. Go fuck your
wife for that hour and forget the game.
Believe it or not, some people have issues
with that.
\_ I know plenty of married gamers whose spouses
don't game but don't have a problem with it.
It's a question of how much you do it. Being
a gamer doesn't mean you are a terminal case
who makes games your first priority.
\_ You're all missing the point. The point is
that "gamers" are not a voting block. Whether
they're 19, 30 or 50, they'll vote based on
taxes, war, religion, social policy or whatever
just like everyone else--whereas the moms of
underage gamers can easily be swayed by stupid
fear campaigns. So you can win votes from
soccer moms who are known to vote in large
numbers and to be willing to vote for either
party by demonizing video games, but in spite
of all their bitching on slashdot or motd,
the "gamer vote" doesn't matter. How old the
gamers are is completely beside the point. |
| 2006/11/8-10 [Politics/Domestic/Election, Politics/Domestic] UID:45265 Activity:nil |
11/8 As it turns out, despite more spending for Republican campaigns,
the Democrats won. Elections do not always follow money.
\_ err. they did kept the Senate. and only Senate can impeach
the president, no?
\_ Well, unless 'kept' means 'lost' in this context.....
\_ I guess kept is a way of saying "didn't keep"?
\_ No, the house can impeach the POTUS.
\_ More correctly, the house impeaches, the senate convicts.
While presidents have been impeached by the house, none has
been convicted by the senate.
\_ Simple majority in the House to impeach; 2/3 majority in
the Senate to convict.
\_ This is a new meaning of the word "kept" that I'm not familiar
with. Perhaps you could enlighten us? |
| 2006/11/8-9 [Politics/Domestic/California, Politics/Domestic/California/Arnold] UID:45266 Activity:nil |
11/8 So I guess we can dismiss all the nutty claims that Diebold was fixing
their machines to make Republicans win?
\_ Great. Maybe the first time someone hacks a US election, it'll
be the dems, maybe it'll be a foreign power, and maybe it'll be a
super 37337 15 year old jolt addict from St. Petersburg. But as
long as it didnt' happen yesterday, and didn't involve the GOP,
you're happy? Does it seriously not bother you that we have less
oversight for voting machines than the state of Nevada does for
video slot machines? When every vote is counted electronically,
and our next president ends up being a death metal star from
eastern Europe, don't come crying to me.
\_ how about just Ah-nold? ob after constitutional amendment
\_ No. You can say that any vote machine fixing that took place
was insufficient to skew the overall result. -John |
| 2006/11/8-9 [Politics/Domestic/California] UID:45267 Activity:nil |
11/8 So what happened to all the absentee ballots? Wasn't that one of the
big pre-election stories?
\_ i thought absentee ballots are not counted unless the election is
really close, no?
\_ 50% of voters in CA were estimated to be absentee. And absentee
ballots are *always* counted if they qualify. |
| 2006/11/8-10 [Recreation/Humor] UID:45268 Activity:nil |
11/8 And now for something completely different. (NANOWRIMO joke)
http://www.homeonthestrange.com/view.php?ID=126 |
| 2006/11/8-9 [Politics/Domestic, Politics/Domestic/Crime] UID:45269 Activity:kinda low |
11/8 Hah. Dems win and Rummy steps down. Suddenly all those people who felt
guilty about voting Dem feel a whoooooole lot better.
\_ Watch those Democrats implode!
\_ I just realized Rummy was also Secretary of Defence when he was in
his forties.
\_ I think Rummy has been both the youngest and oldest sec
of defense. |
| 2006/11/8-9 [Uncategorized] UID:45270 Activity:nil |
11/8 im in ur capitol CONTROLIN UR SENATE
\_ oh no I hate that meme, it was never funny... please don't let it
infest the motd thx |
| 2006/11/8-9 [Politics/Domestic/California] UID:45271 Activity:low |
11/8 Every single CA prop failed! Thank you CA voters for
restoring my faith in humanity.
\_ Except for the ones that passed?
http://vote.ss.ca.gov/Returns/prop/00.htm
\_ Maybe this person meant the non-bond-issue props. The sex-
offender one passed.
\_ Mmm. That's $2B well spent. I mean, there are serious doubts
it will actually protect a single child, but you can't vote
against TEH CHILDREN!
\_ "sex offender" + "children" = sure win prop
\_ Sigh. Never mind that public urination is considered a sex
crime (misdemeanor) in some places.
\_ Of course prop 83 didn't apply to public urination.
\_ Man, i just had a way better idea than Jessica's law. When
the Child molesters get out of prison, we'll give them the
option of $10,000 and a free 1-way ticket to Bankok as long
as they agree to never return. (We revoke citizenship.) I
think John Mark Karr would take it. |
| 2006/11/8-9 [Politics/Domestic] UID:45272 Activity:nil |
11/8 One good thing about the Dems winning--I'll finally hear the good news
about the economy.
\_ Loser says what? |
| 2006/11/8-10 [Recreation/Dating] UID:45274 Activity:nil |
11/8 Dear John, could you please post pictures of Ipanema and the
beautiful girls there? And may I ask how and why you travel
to exotic places so much? Are you a consultant or something?
I'd like to go to these places one day, when I have more money.
Thanks for sharing your pictures John! You're awesome.
\_ This reminds me of when there was some interesting wildlife outside
the building where I work, and everyone was running around to take
pictures of them. One guy pointed out that if you really want
good pictures of wildlife for some reason, you can just do a
google images search for the same animals where you'll see hundreds
of pictures taken with better cameras closer up than you're going
to get, and taken by more talented photographers. Why don't you do
a google images search for hot women on a beach and pretend John
took all of them.
\_ If you want to find quality pictures, try http://flikr.com.
\_ Here's a few. They're from Trancoso and South of there, in
Bahia state. The colors aren't great as I don't have any good
CR2-PNG converters (shut up, Partha), but I even found one with
a Brazilian gurl for you!!11 As for travelling, it's what I do
a lot with my girlfriend, especially while we're spending a year
in S. America and I've got basically fuck-all for work down here.
http://www.flickr.com/photos/20046048@N00 -John |
| 2006/11/8-10 [Science/GlobalWarming] UID:45275 Activity:nil |
11/8 It turned out that energy and oil companies like Chevron paid over
100 million dollars to anti Prop 87 TV ads. Will they take that
as a loss, or will we as consumers have to pay them back 100
million dollars at the pumps?
\_ It will be booked as a lobbying expense. It's not so simple as
"raise prices to recover $100M", but it has a negative effect on
profit margins and will encourage them to raise prices to compensate |
| 2006/11/8-9 [Computer/SW/WWW/Browsers] UID:45276 Activity:nil 66%like:45291 |
11/8 Firefox 1.5.0.8 is out. |
| 2006/11/8-10 [Politics/Domestic/President/Bush] UID:45277 Activity:nil |
11/8 when dubya says he "takes responsibility" for loss of the House,
does that mean he'll resign and let Cheney take over, or that he'll
appoint some moderate SCOTUS judges?
\_ No he means it like all people in power mean it. And do you
really want Cheney? |
| 2006/11/8 [Politics/Domestic] UID:45278 Activity:very high |
11/8 Allen concedes. House and Senate officially in hand of
the Democrats. I expect great things. Don't let me down!
\_ All the news sites I see say "Associated Press declare Webb winner".
WTF?
\_ Do you have examples of what you expect? Just curious.
\_ Is this the first time a Mormon will lead the Senate?
\_ Allen concedes? url please.
\_ He was down 7k. Lawsuits and noise about election fraud
with big spreads aren't a Republican trait.
\_ Right. They steal their elections fair and square. |
| 2006/11/8 [Uncategorized] UID:45279 Activity:high |
11/8 motd getting a bit long?
\_ yesterday's discussion removed |
| 2006/11/8 [Politics/Domestic/California] UID:45280 Activity:nil |
11/8 AP Reporting dems take senate. All the networks are reporting this.
"An adviser to Allen, speaking on condition of anonymity because his
boss had not formally decided to end the campaign, said the senator
wanted to wait until most of canvassing was completed before
announcing his decision, possibly as early as Thursday evening.
The adviser said that Allen was disinclined to request a recount if
the final vote spread was similar to that of election night."
http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20061109/ap_on_el_se/democrats_senate |
| 2006/11/8-10 [Politics/Domestic/California] UID:45281 Activity:low |
11/7 http://vote.ss.ca.gov/Returns/gov/mapBN.htm The only counties that voted for Angelides were the LA county and N Cal liberal counties. The OC (south of LA) overwhelmingly voted for Republican as expected, as did the inline empires. \_ But he will wear the Crown of Appolonius upon a troubled brow... \_ But he will wear the Crown of Aquilonia upon a troubled brow... \_ Thanks for the correction. I bow to your superior Conan knowledge. -OP knowledge. -PP |
| 2006/11/8-10 [Politics/Domestic/Gay, Politics/Domestic] UID:45282 Activity:kinda low |
11/8 Say you're a politician and you just lost an election, and say
you're not a wealthy dot-comer who made millions from eBay or
inherited millions from your family, what would you do
for a living?
\_ You stay home all day and cry. Like Al Gore. Then after a year
or two you start making a movie you're passionate about so that
you can forget about your loss. Like Al Gore.
\_ Well, you could always hit the lecture circuit and make an
absurd amount of money...like Al Gore
\_ Lobbyist. Go back to law. Give talks. Do what you were doing
pre politician. Lots of things.
\_ http://www.uploadfile.info/uploads/3afec4f94f.jpg
1. Buy daughter a puppy
2. Send son off to Hogwarts
3. Repress homosexual urges
4. Profit!
\_ awesome. |
| 2006/11/8-9 [Computer/SW] UID:45283 Activity:nil |
11/8 rm: remove write-protected regular file `Great BJ-HJ-CS vid clips
Vol. III.torrent'? y |
| 2006/11/8-10 [Politics/Domestic/California] UID:45284 Activity:nil |
11/8 Inland valley hicks voted NO on prop 90 (limiting Eminent Domain).
Why is that? Do they enjoy having personal property taken away?
http://vote.ss.ca.gov/Returns/prop/mapR090.htm
\_ hi troll!
\_ 90 was a great proposition with a really horrible one attached to it
..but since i don't expect most of the inland valleys to read.. no
clue why they voted against it
\_ There are lots of reasons to both like and dislike this Prop.
It depends on what side of the fence you are on. A similar law
passed in Oregon led to lots of litigation.
\_ I think you read the map backwards or we have different definitions
of "NO" or "inland valley"
\_ Anti-ED is good but prop 90 had some stuff some people may have
thought went too far. I'm a bit surprised it wasn't a land slide
in 90's favor. Next time.
\_ 90 was dumb. it was written very generally. even the official
CA explanation of it was full of "well it might...."
and "could be interpreted...." clauses. That sucks.
Props should be very specific.
\_ The official explanations are always written in those terms.
You have to read the prop itself. I don't do more than
skim the official explanations as a quick prep for reading
the actual real text of the prop. I hope you don't think
it sucked based on the generalised terms used by to describe
it by the Secretary of State's office. |
| 5/21 |