9/22 Note to future employers reading jblack's archives. Justin P Black
is a total nut case. Just search for his name on the archiver.
\_ I don't like jblack's extremist right-wing postings as the next
person. But don't you think it's wrong to use a public
discussion forum to personally smear other people? That seems
like a very Fox New's type thing to do.
\_ Op's post reflects more negatively on him than it does on
the guy he's talking about. I don't really care if I have to
work with someone who has political opinions I think are crazy
(I've done plenty of that, and it can be fun atually). However,
if I thought some self-righteous asshole like op thought he
could get away with not hiring someone because of his political
opinions, there's no way I'd work for him. That sort of rigid
authoritarian attitude is likely to carry over into technical,
work-related matters and make someone impossible to work for/with.
Whereas wingnut political opinions can be easily separated from
technical matters, and have no effect on quality of life at work.
\_ If people stopped hiring software people with insane fringe
political opinions, the software industry would die in a week.
\_ What archiver?
\_ You're actually helping him, not hurting him. If someone doesn't
hire him because some anonymous jackass posted some bit of idiocy
like yours on some stupid blog, you've just saved him from one of
the worst jobs possible: working for stupid people.
\_ I already circulated a negative recommendation in my company.
I am making sure jblack gets special attentions. I work at Intel
Corporation and I've passed the list to my HR friends at Yahoo,
Google, HP, Applied Materials, and other major corporations.
They've also begun circulating his name to the HR depts in
other companies as well. Please help me circulate jblack's
name throughout the valley and tell me which companies
you've passed the recommendation to so that we don't duplicate
efforts. Thanks -alum of 1990, Intel Verification, SC
\_ Hey, asshole! Why don't you post your name so people who
believe in free speech can avoid dealing with you ever?
Posting freeper links to a public forum and trying to blacklist
someone from an industry are two very different things. The first
is what what the motd is for, and the second is something that
is borderline illegal, against policy in some companies, and
makes you a bad human being. I'm going to post my name just
in the hopes that I never accidentally get hired by you or your
asshole friends. And for the record, I dissagree with jblack
on every issue(except free speech on the motd and gun control).
-lafe
\_ If only the world really worked that way....
\_ Free speech for me, eh? -alum of 1997, at Intel SC until 2000
Oh yeah, I can sign my name. -emarkp
\_ What's wrong with hiring people with wacky political views so long
as they do good work and don't draw bad press to the company?
Do you support McCarthy-era blacklisting of communists?
\_ Group dynamics is just as important as technical skills. We
had a brilliant guy in our lab from the midwest with extremist
views (he thinks we should nuke Iraq, Iran, and N Korea). For
two years the manager tried to group him into different
projects and the projects all turned out to be disasterous
because we just couldn't get along. The manager gave up and
the midwest dude drifted to his little projects while most of
us moved on. Don't underestimate the power of group dynamics.
\_ His problem wasn't his views. His problem was sharing them
at work. Were the rest of you sharing your views on the same
topics or was he this wildman lone wolf out to convert you
all to nuking everyone? I'll bet his version of events is
something like, "I was recruited out to the West Coast where
all these obnoxious assholes wouldn't shutup about their
politics so I tried different groups to get away from them
but they were all more interested in everyone thinking like
them politically than in getting any work done, so I went
and did my own projects until I could get away from that
place".
\_ It won't be good for the team if he's widely hated.
\_ Professionals don't discuss their politics, religion and other
BS at work. Furthermore if you *hate* someone because they
have different political views than you, the problem is yours,
not theirs.
\_ In theory, you're absolutely right. Professionals do not
discuss shit outside of their professional work.
In practice, you're wrong. Most of the professionals
in this world are not that professional.
\_ All true. Still doesn't change the fact that employers
_will_ Google you these days before hiring you.
\_ And really, if an anonymous motd entry showing up on
google is a barrier to a job you've done him a great
service by saving him from a job with morons.
\_ Why are you such a wuss that you won't publish your name?
Anonymously naming other people is pretty low. -jrleek
\_ Because if he did, he might find himself on a counter-blacklist.
I couldn't care less about jblack's political leanings but I hate
this pathetic coward blacklist guy's behavior. Unlike the
politics, this sort of thing is something that is likely to
reflect on being a shitty guy to work with.
\_ The blacklist guy is kchang (Kevin Chang), who I'm sure is
already on plenty of blacklists for his stalking behavior.
-tom
\_ It isn't that difficult to figure out who is who on the motd.
He may very well find his own name spread around the valley,
but really my question is, "why does he care?". And no, I
know that places like Intel, HP, etc are too damned big and
disorganised, especially in hiring, to have a global blackist
created by motd writers. The whole concept is just silly and
a vain attempt to silence jblack for having political views
that differ from the childish and petty original poster.
\_ Are we running the "best of" soda useless classic motd discussions?
\_ Wow. Facism is alive and well in the liberal, tolerant Bay Area.
\_ Should we take this at face value? |
http://csua.com/feed/