|
2006/8/25-27 [Uncategorized] UID:44147 Activity:nil |
8/25 In case this helps anyone, the fonts that come with the tetex packages are incomplete. When dvips encounters a missing font, it scales another and does so imperfectly. This can screw with the look of a document. The fix is simple: install the package lmodern -ben g |
2006/8/25-27 [Computer/Networking, Computer/HW/Drives] UID:44148 Activity:nil |
8/25 I have a portable USB HD (2.5") that I built myself with WD HD and an enclosure. On some systems it won't power on via the USB cable, it'll try to spin up, but does not successfully spin up. Could it be those machines do not provide enough power via the usb output? On one machine that fails to power up, I tried the fire-wire cable, it powered up fine. It also powers up fine on my machine via USB. Thanks. \_ Yes, exactly. Not all USB ports are made the same. I have a 4 port USB hub that will power a mouse or other small device but nothing with a real power need "but it should". Those systems are simply not providing enough power via their USB ports. \_ this is a well-known issue with some enclosures, see any newegg reviews of lower-rated enclosures. \_ Hmm, what would you consider a 'good' enclosure? My first one, the BYTECC HD-201U2, highly rated at new-egg, was a piece of crap. Dead on arrival, and the construction was also cheap. Drive hold in place by foam padding? My current one is a Macally PHR-250CC, much better designed and made, from the IC board to the way the drive is secured to the board to the way the board secures to the case. Could also be my drive, but I specifically picked one with average RPM so it won't suck as much power.. -op \_ http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.asp?Item=N82E16817145135 (fixed the URL) Vantec Nexstar 3 black (also in red and navy blue) I got that for my gf, and it looks really nice, but she hasn't used it much. I purposely didn't order the BYTECC you got because it looked cheap from the photos and someone posted about a screw getting stripped. Oh well. Anyways, that was my choice for "best USB 2.5 enclosure" from my research in early July. I just noticed a new review saying it corrupts data. used it much. I didn't order the BYTECC because it looked cheap from the photos and someone posted about a screw getting stripped. Oh well. Anyways, the Vantec was my choice for "best USB 2.5 enclosure" from my research in early July. I just noticed a new review saying it corrupts data. Oh well, looks like the Macally is what you want. If I could have a do-over, I'd get this: http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.asp?Item=N82E16817145658 I have the AMS Venus DS3 3.5" enclosure, use it ALL the time and never had problems, so hopefully the 2.5" is the same. I have some AMS Venus DS3 3.5" enclosures, use them ALL the time and never had problems so hopefully the 2.5" is the same. \_ There are "powered" and "unpowered" USB ports. The former supplies more juice than the latter. \_ Even with a powered USB port, the spec only requires that it is able to deliver 500mA @5V, or 2.5W. There's no way you should expect the USB port to power a hard drive. That's while all HDD enclosures have seperate power supplies. \_ ^all^all usb -- I have yet to have problems with my Firewire HDs getting enough juice. |
2006/8/25-28 [Computer/SW/Languages, Computer/SW/Compilers] UID:44149 Activity:nil |
8/25 Why are iterators "superior" or more recently popular over the traditional method of using for loops and indexing? \_ I guess it's because you can change an array to some other data structure (linked-list, tree, ...) without changing the loop code. \_ This is a limitation of your language, not the concept of looping \_ They handle multithreaded use cases better. They hide implementation details. You can pass iterators around between functions and they do what you want witout much hassle. \_ Traditionally doing pointer comparisons is faster than dereferencing by index. (Good compilers probably will transform the latter for you for simple data structures like arrays, though.) Also, they're simply an abstraction that better describe what you're trying to accomplish (reverse_iterator) or what your needs are (const_iterator). |
2006/8/25-28 [Reference/RealEstate] UID:44150 Activity:nil |
8/25 http://money.cnn.com/2006/08/24/real_estate/pluggedin_tully.fortune Yeah it's about time!!! -bitter young grad, born and graduated in the "wrong" era and missed out on dot-com and housing boom. \_ I think a correction to cool things down is a healthy thing. --- '93 grad who didn't profit from the dot-com or housing boom, didn't have rich parents, and own one home and one rental \_ I think it's a good thing. --- old grad who didn't profit from the dot-com era, didn't have rich parents, and own one home and one rental \_ Bad news is that rents are on the way up. \_ Awesome. Now we renters can be smug on the motd. RENTS WILL NEVER GO DOWN!!!!11!!! --smug renter |
2006/8/25-29 [Politics/Domestic/President/Clinton, Politics/Domestic/President/Bush] UID:44151 Activity:nil |
8/25 http://www.washingtonmonthly.com/features/2006/0609.dreyfuss.html Very interesting article on the Iraq Study (!Survey) Group "if the Democrats win back one or both houses of Congress in November, they would unleash a series of investigative hearings on Iraq, the war on terrorism, and civil liberties that could fatally weaken the administration and remove the last props of political support for the war, setting the stage for a potential Republican electoral disaster" (I came to the above conclusion some time ago, as well) \_ On the other hand, it could totally backfire on the Democrats as the Clinton impeachment did on the Republicans. \_ Dubya doesn't have Clinton's general popularity, but then again Bubba didn't have Dubya's mushroom cloud. \_ you mean the type of general popularity that got Clinton a whopping 43% of the popular vote in 1992? Or the type that got him 49.2% of the popular vote in the lowest voter turnouts in decades? At least Dubya got >50% once. \_ your first example is stupid. you don't need me to tell you why. \_ ob stronger 3rd party candidates and pre-9/11 world ob "general popularity" == approval rating ob http://csua.org/u/grk (crooksandliars.com) \_ Why do the Democrats hate America? \_ Please explain to me how the Clinton impeachment backfired on the GOP. Although it did not achieve the stated goal of removing him from office, it sure did distract from his attempts to get his policies pushed through. -confused (and bitter) libdem \_ Well the GOP came across looking mean and spiteful and then proceeded to take over all 3 branches of government for six years. That'll learn em! |
2006/8/25-28 [Politics/Domestic/President/Reagan, Politics/Domestic/President/Bush] UID:44152 Activity:nil |
8/25 Is this a sarcastic blog entry? http://powerlineblog.com/archives/015081.php \_ It's powerline... so no. \_ I guess they're giving out rose-colored Koolaid now at these functions \_ John Hinderaker brews his own Koolaid. Call him and ask: (612) 220-1060. |
2006/8/25-28 [Computer/SW/Languages/C_Cplusplus] UID:44153 Activity:nil |
8/25 Dear C++ experts. Why would there be two "const" in the following method declaration? const bool ILikeMotd() const; \_ The first const refers to the data type returned. The second const says the function doesn't modify an object's member variables. The first const in your example is bad, I believe; it should be something like const bool& or const bool*. |
2006/8/25-26 [Uncategorized] UID:44154 Activity:nil |
8/25 Jesus Loves You As Long As GOP Is In Control. |
2006/8/25-29 [Computer/HW/Memory, Recreation/Humor] UID:44155 Activity:nil Cat_by:auto |
8/25 USB teddy bear holds data, scares children: http://tinyurl.com/m9ak4 -John |
2006/8/25-29 [Computer/Theory] UID:44156 Activity:moderate |
8/25 http://www.ucla.edu/about/faculty/tao.html \_ Sigh. Tao >>>>>>>>>> me. \_ "Such is Tao's reputation that mathematicians now compete to interest him in their problems, and he is becoming a kind of Mr. Fix-it for frustrated researchers. 'If you're stuck on a problem, then one way out is to interest Terence Tao'" \_ This is why I got out of math. No amount of hard work or slightly clever tricks or listening to the advice of smart old guys can come close to compensating for not being a genius in math. Why should I spend three years of my life working hard on a problem that some genius can solve in a couple hours? Other sciences are not like that. \- yeah, i know that feeling. years ago a friend of mine asked me about an "extra credit" problem for his 50a class. I couldnt believe I couldnt figure it out ... and started working on it with some other friends for a few days. We then started talking to Robin Hartshorne about it ... it was amazing the stuff he came up with in an hour. BTW, it turned out it was an open problem not an "extra credit" problem. an "extra credit" problem. It is interesting how many of these people are just not normal ... Solovay, for example. Another friend of mine reported a homeless man in the elevator to the math dept ... their reaction was "oh, that is Prof x". \_ Was he bald and reading minds? \_ Is there (and I really am just curious) something to be said about someone this young winning a Fields medal? If this is truly like the Nobel prize of math, shouldn't/aren't awards like this usually given to people who are older (i.e. more well established in the field, more published, etc.)? I'm just wondering if this is a subtle publicity stunt of sorts. But I do realize this kid is a math genius, too. \_ You have to be under 40 to win the Fields Medal. \_ OH, I didn't know that actually. Thanks. -op \_ OH, I didn't know that actually. Thanks. -pp \- note: that is "why" AWILES didnt get a FM for the FLT proof, but got a consolation prize of some lawn furniture. \- No, it's not a "stunt". I'm actually kinda surprised Tao is getting all this special attention. I think th point of the \- It's not a "stunt". I'm actually kinda surprised Tao is getting all this special attention. I think the point of the "under 40" rule is so that the prize doesnt become a "liefetime achievement award". Sort of the opposite of a Life Oscar ... who/how old was the youngest Life Oscar Winner? \_ But what if you do something great after 40? Wiles got screwed Don't the rules imply that if you don't do anything great b4 40, you won't. Wasn't it RIBET's result that turned Wiles onto Fermat? He must have forgotten to check how old he was. \- Wiles hardly got screwed ... and we only think in those terms because he coincidentally missed by only a couple of years [would you have said "he go screwed" if he did the work when he was 50?]. While WILES isnt exactly a \_ Yes. There should be a Nobel or equiv for Math. household name, you have heard of him ... how many Fields Medalists have you heard of? Did HAWKING get screwed because he hasnt won a Physics nobel? It's not like WILES would have been able to get a better academic position if he won a FM. In some cases the person is honored by the prize, in other cases the prize is honored by them ... do yu think VS Naipual readership changed after he won the lit Nobel? \_ I think most people in the physics department believe Erwin Hahn got screwed for not getting it for spin echo. \- i think there are probably more valid cases of screwage when person A B C D are involved in idea X, but only A B C win an award rather than nobdy getting an award for some idea. I guess the famous case of this is RFRANKLIN in the DNA episode [nobel can only be split up to 3ways], \_ also can't be given to dead people. which she was. and I dunno how valid that case is, but I suppose CHIEN-SHIUNG WU [UCB Physics PhD ... in 1940!] has a pretty good case in the YANG-LEE PARITY case. As for UCB Physics, do people think ZUMINO has been screwed? \- BTW, if you are interested in a somewhat interesting take on "math culture", see: http://www.dpmms.cam.ac.uk/~wtg10/2cultures.pdf It's by Timothy GOWERS, who is Yet Another Fields Medalist [and was a student of BELA BOLLOBAS, whom some of you may know, if you have studied GRAPH THEORY]. GOWERS divides mathematicians into "problem solvers" and theory builders ... I think generally people outside the math community -- but who have studied some math -- dont hear hear much about people working on inscrutable, hard problems. [ObTrivia: GOWERS won the Fields medal the same year as CURT MCMULLEN, who used to be at Berkeley but was stolen by Harvard and is kind of a jerk, and BORCHARDS, who is at Berkeley still and works on MOONSHINE, and had brain analyzed by ALI G's cousin, who is a famous research psychologist]. |