|
2006/7/14-18 [Politics/Domestic] UID:43669 Activity:nil |
7/13 I am looking into buying a light weight bike--mostly riding in the parks with some weekend off the road riding. Is Marin's Hawk Hill a good buy for a $800 budget? Thx. \_ If you're a beginner you SHOULD buy a really nice ***USED*** bike. A used Giant OCR C1/C2 is pretty decent. But more importantly you should try out a few. Go to your local bike shop (LBS) and ask for demo rides, and then find out what you like. People say aluminum vibrates a lot, and steel is more gentle, but only you can find out what you like. Lastly, may I recommend clipless shoes, as they make your strokes much more efficient. |
2006/7/14-18 [Computer/Domains, Computer/Networking, Computer/SW/WWW/Browsers] UID:43670 Activity:nil |
7/14 Has all mail been delivered? \_ In the words of Ted Stevens ("internet expert"): The internet is not something that you just dump something on. It's not a big truck. It's a series of tubes. And if you don't understand that those tubes can be filled, and if they're filled when you put your message in it, it gets in line, it's gonna be delayed by anyone who puts into that tube enormous amounts of material, enormous amounts of material. Ten movies streaming across that that, internet, and what happens to your own personal internet? I...just the other day, got internet was sent by my staff at 10 o'clock in the morning on Friday, I got it yesterday. Why? \_ So, I think your answer is, no, it's not all been delivered, never has been, never will be. Let me rephrase my question. Has mail been delivered to the extent that it normally would be, or is there still a significant percentage of the mail from when sendmail was down that hasn't been delivered yet? It seems that some of my mail is missing. Not sure if it's just 1 message, or a significant percentage. -op \_ I think the intelligent way to interpret this question, is for someone in the know to tell us if mail was queued on another machine during extended periods of downtime, and if not, approximately how long that non-queueing-of-mail went on for. |
2006/7/14-18 [Computer/HW/Memory, Computer/SW/Unix] UID:43671 Activity:nil |
7/14 So as I understand it, Intel introduced Hyperthreading because the penalty for a cache miss or branch misprediction on Netburst was huge so to make up for it they could work on a different thread while waiting for memory latency. Given that the Core2 architecture has such a wide execution path, couldn't they use HT to try and keep all those execution units full? \_ I attended one of Intel's talks on campus and the "huge penalty" myth is a myth. As the number of pipelines increases, the depth of the miss and a pipe flush is longer, yes. However, keep in mind that since each stage in the pipe is shorter the clock cycle is also faster. Thus, in terms of absolute time (time=number of pipes that need to be flushed * cycle time), the increase in P4 from the old architecture is only increased by ~20% time, which is insignificant in computer science speak. As for keeping execution units full, it's very much application dependent. Even with the huge instruction reorder mechanisms some applications still can't utilize them all. |
2006/7/14-18 [Politics/Foreign/MiddleEast/Iraq] UID:43672 Activity:nil |
7/14 Baghdad descending into total anarchy. http://www.timesonline.co.uk/article/0,,3-2268585_2,00.html "A local journalist told me bitterly this week that Iraqis find it ironic that Saddam Hussein is on trial for killing 148 people 24 years ago, while militias loyal to political parties now in government kill that many people every few days. But it is not an irony that anyone here has time to laugh about. They are too busy packing their bags and wondering how they can get out alive." \_ but it is our God given duty to bring FREEDOM LIBERTY AND THE PURSUIT OF HAPPINESS into primitive cultures around the world, starting with Iraq! There is no price too great for our glorious War on every primitive culture on this planet. The War is totally worth it. God Bless. \_ Son, all I've ever asked of my marines is that they obey my orders as they would the word of God. We are here to help the Vietnamese, because inside every gook there is an American trying to get out. It's a hardball world, son. We've gotta keep our heads until this peace craze blows over. \_ Personally, I think, uh... they don't really want to be involved in this war. You know, I mean... they sort of took away our freedom and gave it to the, to the gookers, you know. But they don't want it. They'd rather be alive than free, I guess. Poor dumb bastards. \_ that's because there is evidence for that.. there are tons more people killed but no evidence to support it.. \_ that's <censored by the US Government> no <censored by the US Government> support <censored> \_ Uh...forest, trees anyone? \_ sorta like how evidence of WMD's was the technical reason for the war? \_ No, the real difference is that this is (largely) the people killing themselves. \_ So the people killing each other is preferable to the government doing it? \_ it's a democratic right! if yer still alive, it's probably because you and yours have also exercised yer right to bear an assault rifle! \_ If you've been paying attention to other reporting coming out of Baghdad recently, it is becoming evident that the government is collaborating with the militia death squads - or at least tacitly supporting them. For instance see: http://www.salon.com/news/feature/2006/07/12/baghdad For a personal perspective: http://www.csua.org/u/gfl (riverbend blog) \_ hey, democrats, got a problem for ya. I've been opposing the war all along. And there is a part of me want us just to get out. The logic is that you can not reverse a failed policy (i.e. invading iraq), and we shouldn't be responsible for such failed policy. HOWEVER, it is more and more clear that if we get out prematurely, there will be a genocide of some sort... what should we do? continue Bush's failed policy? \_ Check the Lawrence Kaplan article. The (quiet) Bush policy is withdrawal anyway, even though they keep vigorously denying the existence of a "timetable." \_ and blaming democrats for the genocide happened afterwards... sounds like an ingenius plan of Karl Rove again. \_ any link to that article? \_ Here you go: http://www.tnr.com/doc.mhtml?pt=3FtL2Vxi34T0BA0X2XTFjy%3D%3D \_ I told you a long time ago what we should do, you are just not interested in doing what will work. |
2006/7/14-19 [Politics/Foreign/MiddleEast/Others, Politics/Foreign/MiddleEast/Israel] UID:43673 Activity:nil |
7/14 http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20060714/ap_on_re_mi_ea/lebanon_israel_62 "The level of damage inflicted by Israel appeared finely calibrated. For example, a missile punched a hole in a major suspension bridge on the Beirut-Damascus road but did not destroy it, unlike less expensive bridges on the road that were brought down. An Israeli strike hit fuel depots at one of Beirut's two power stations sending massive fireballs and smoke into the sky but avoided the station itself." \_ Israel's attack is always "pinpointed." But the past record showed pinpointed attack often result in death of, let say, 7 month old terrorist, or entire terrorist's family age from 9-17. Some would argue that "unjustified death" from those Israel attack validates sucide bombing tactics in the middle of crowded buses. You know, those Arab has such twisted sense of what is justifiable what is not... those 7 month old, future terrorist, and those 1 year old future terrorist *DESERVED* to be bombed or shelled; ANY reasonable person from the Western world would agree with that. \_ the goal of a terrorist bomber is to kill as many civilians as possible. this speaks for itself. \_ the goal of terrorist bomber is to make the cost of occupation as high as possible. \_ The goal of a terrorist bomber is not something for a modern democracy to measure its actions by. There is a very big line between civilian casualties incurred from hitting a military or paramilitary target, and indiscriminately killed women or children. The former is tragic and to be avoided whenever possible, but before judging, what would _you_ do? -John \_ remember, more Iraqi civilians died of US bombing during the invasion than those killed by suicide bombers. (iraqibodycount) are you saying that as long as we kill civilians via arial bombing, that will be ok? \_ What would I do? Get the fuck out. I'd move to America or Europe and not look back, if I were either Israeli or Arab. -!pp \_ To them it's home. By this logic, I don't think anyone would stay where they're from (because no matter where you are, it's get-the-fuck-outtable in someone else's view... -John \_ this is great. Those Arabs who live there for 1800 years doesn't belong there. those who migrate to there in 1948 consider that "home" and have the right to defend itself... \_ Israel has no problems with allowing Arabs in the country and holding government posts. Arabs seem to have a problem with Israelis being there. \_ Why won't they let the 1948 refugees back in then? Isreal only allows a very few Arabs in their country and the ones that they do allow are 2nd class citizens, ala apartheid. \_ They left. Why should they be allowed back in? Can the Jews who got kicked out of the Arab countries in the Middle East return home and get their stuff back, too? No. There are Arabs in the Israeli government. They were elected to office just like in any democracy. If you have a specific example of second classness, please share. \_ http://www.csua.org/u/gg7 http://www.csua.org/u/gg6 45% of Isreali Arabs live in poverty, compared to 15% of Isreali Jews. Okay, I step back from my apartheid statement though, that is going too far. But they are second class citizens. Unlike the Palestinians stuck in the occupied territory, who are not even citizens at all. \_ So there is evidence that Israeli Arabs are being oppressed by the government and lack the full rights of Israeli Jews and this explains the higher poverty rates? \_ how about this kind of turkey shoot? these guys are 1. civilian and 2. trying to get out: http://tinyurl.com/lwxtj according to your logic, bus bombing from the air or artillery shell is perfectly ok? I am sorry, I ain't no Hezbollah or Hamas, but I don't find this convincing. \_ No, according to my logic its okay if you're not \_ No, according to my logic its tragic, but maybe very regrettably unavoidable, if you're not blatantly trying to whack civilians (and trying to avoid doing so whenever possible.) Which, as far as I'm aware, is usually the case. And as for who's lived there longer, let's see, I think most Arabs (and most Israelis) were probably born there after 1948? They're both there now, and bitching about whose grandparents were where first won't solve it. -Johnj won't solve it. -John j \_ bombing a civilian bus call it "tragic?" The differences is that I don't believe every thing Israeli says, you do. I sincerely don't think Israeli care too much about civilian casualties, or collateral damage involves MASSIVE number of women and children. Number talk, John. Arabic civilian casualties is at least one order of magnitude than Israeli civilian in the past conflict. You really think the 18,000 casualties in Lebanon back in 1982 were all Hezbollah fighters? How about Israeli-backed Christian groups who slaughter every Sunni and Shiite in sight? The truth is, Israeli doesn't care. They felt they need to defend itself. If it means 20 civilians or 9 family members going to die along with that one terrorist, they will drop the bomb, fire the missile. There is no differences between Hamas, Islamic Jihad, and IDF. While American media covers virtually every sucide bombers attack, there is virtually no photographs, video footage or any kind of media coverage of Arabic civilian fleeing Southern Lebanon and being mow down by IDF machine guns. IDF reminds me a lot of the behavior of Imperial Japanese Army in China backed in the WW2 days. |
2006/7/14-18 [Recreation/Computer/Games] UID:43674 Activity:nil |
7/14 Valve announces they're finally going to release Team Fortress 2 http://www.steampowered.com/index.php?area=news&id=691 |