|
2006/5/12-15 [Transportation/Motorcycle] UID:43028 Activity:nil |
5/11 http://i.timeinc.net/popsci/video/revopower.mov Yet another powered bicycle. \_ if it's powered, it's a motorcycle. -tom \_ or a moped. |
2006/5/12 [Politics/Domestic/California, Reference/Tax] UID:43029 Activity:nil |
5/11 http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/congress_taxes I make over 100K base salary, not including options/stocks. How does this law benefit me? |
2006/5/12-15 [Academia/GradSchool] UID:43030 Activity:nil |
5/11 http://www.cnn.com/2006/EDUCATION/05/10/perpetual.student.ap I can't believe you can be an undergrad for 12 years. I guess he gets a lot of women or something. \_ How long was PSB a grad student? I think he has this guy beat. \_ I don't think PSB was ever a gradstudent? Just an undergrad taking grad level courses? How about it Partha? BTW, did you ever graduate? That isn't meant as a smear--you're probably better educated than I. --PeterM |
2006/5/12-17 [Science/Electric, Science/GlobalWarming] UID:43031 Activity:nil |
5/11 I bought a few expensive LED lightbulbs. Comments: when they say an LED is equivalent to X watts incandescent bulb, it's marketing bullshit. In reality, it's more like X/2 or X/3. LED bulbs may save you a lot of energy, but they're simply not that bright. Secondly, they look very very unnatural. With incandescent bulbs, you get various frequencies and things look natural. With LEDs, you get cold white light and you feel depressed, which is perfectly ok if you're into goth or rave. Screw energy savings, I'm going back to 60-100W heat generating bulbs and 300W halogen bulbs. \_ ... or use fluorescents... \_ What type did you go with? Most of the LED bulb manufacturers have "soft" versions. \_ Incandescent light doesn't look natural; you're just used to how it looks. Unless you're using full-spectrum bulbs (which also look strange when you first install them), incandescents are extremely yellow. -tom \_ CFLs are almost as efficient and have a very nice spectrum. Any of these type are more pleasant through a lampshade, btw. |
2006/5/12-16 [Politics/Domestic/President/Bush] UID:43032 Activity:nil |
5/11 http://www.tinyrevolution.com/mt/archives/000905.html Bush vs. Nixon. |
2006/5/12-17 [Politics/Domestic/California] UID:43033 Activity:nil |
5/11 Cody's on Telegraph to close: http://csua.org/u/fu2 \_ "Down the block at equally venerated Moe's Books, bookseller Dave Yetter said sales have been down throughout the area. He blamed Berkeley city officials for neglecting Telegraph and instead focusing their efforts on other shopping corridors such as Shattuck Avenue in the downtown area." -- Wow, so downtown Shattuck is what happens when the city council tries to improve an area? What a bunch of losers. If you ask the cops and business owners in Berkeley, they all *hate* the city council. Even more liberal business owners who are more interested in quality goods and services than profits hate them. \_ Vote. Get others to vote. \_ What it comes down to is that I can buy a text for $32 (including shipping) on the Internet or for $51 at Cody's. Yes, brick-and-mortar bookstores are great for browsing, but as a student with an assigned (required) text I don't need to browse. I just want my book for cheap. I imagine the main reason Cody's is closing isn't lack of demand, but a refusal to be competitive with Border's/B&N let alone the Internet. \_ yeah, if they just sold their books for $19 less each, they'd be in much better shape! -tom \_ Imagine how well off they'd be if they'd just charged $100 more for each book! \_ Maybe they would? The main thing when I was there was the B&M shops deal in used books. You already get screwed on taxes with B&M, if they can't even compete on the base price then they deserve to be gone. \_ Retail stores will never be able to compete on price with national mail-order. The world will be a poorer place if places like Cody's all go away. -tom \_ Which is why I have a simple rule. If I use a B&M store to browse and discover what thing I want to buy (salespeople's recs/looking at what is available/etc) I buy that item at the B&M store. Amazon is one of the few internet stores out there that has done a good job at fullfilling those needs. Hell there are things I research on Amazon that I end up buying offline (cause I need it that day or whatever.) \_ if you are also the previous poster, you have an internally inconsistent world view. -tom \_ nope not pp \_ They serve three purposes as far as I can see. 1) stock for when you need it "now" 2) being able to browse 3) convenient used market (although, I guess this too is now done on amazon and ebay, but you can't really examine those items etc.) Cody's was right next to another store anyway and IIRC wasn't usually cheapest. Maybe if they had one larger store with a cafe inside etc. they could stay in business. Anyway, for browsing, libraries are good things. Maybe there should be more budget for that. In any case I don't feel obligated to do charity work for struggling bookstores. \_ and you think the world is a better place without Cody's? \_ Personally, I don't care whether it exists or not. Give me a reason to care. Maybe something else will occupy its space that is better overall? Maybe you think we should pay taxes to support Cody's? Or what? \_ A reason to care is that it was a place with a good selection of books, arranged for browsing, with a knowledgeable staff and a pleasant environment. Telegraph Ave. is lesser for its loss. It's another example of how the "free" market often has undesirable end effects. -tom \_ You know, I think I've been thinking Cody's was actually another store. I think I may never have even gone into Cody's. The problem with Telegraph was how it became a trashy hobo zone. My folks told me they used to go there from the south bay decades ago. When I was at Cal I didn't really enjoy Telegraph. Roaches were crawling on the walls in that Blue Nile restaurant and there were always bums accosting you. And you couldn't park, and the parking meters got sawed off, and the store windows were getting broken overnight, and somebody got murdered around Dwight or something. Whatever. \_ Oh my god. THANK you for articulating this so well. A lot of my friends who went to Berkeley said they loved it because its suckiness built character and made them tough. They loved the bums and the trash and the the murders. My take has always been that the whole city was a total waste of tax payer's money. The best public school in the world should not have to be placed in such a trashy town. As for the people who think I'm a traitor or just hate me because I have nothing good to say about Berkeley-- I don't need to conform with anyone's opinion and you can go fuck yourself. WHATEVER. \- the authors that would come on tour and gives talks/readings at codys was the main benefit i think. and a good example of the free mkt. otherwise i dont think this is really much of an evidence of mkt failure. --psb \_ I'm sorry but you're WRONG. Free market and less government improves people's lifestyle. Case in point, it allows people to work less while giving more freedom to many others: http://abcnews.go.com/Politics/story?id=1955256&page=1 Go Free Market! -Reagan's #1 fan \_ I have never seen the price discrepancy so large (but, disclaimer: I usually shop on amazon and never buy used or third-world paperback editions online.) Usually, the price difference is 5-10 bucks on expensive items before shipping and quite often it's worth it for me to just pick the book at the store instead of waiting for days for it to be delivered. Of course, the presure of the online competition is still undeniable. I buy most books online now. \_ Well, that was a real world example for a book I bought. I realize Cody's cannot compete on price, but to be honest such a large subsidy isn't worth it. I like the idea someone suggested about adding a cafe or something. It's like the gas stations adding mini-marts. The problem is that Berkeley is saturated with cafes. I will miss Cody's, but I still wouldn't buy a book there for $50 when I can get it (new) for $30. \_ I hope all you Amazon shoppers and shareholders are happy... |
2006/5/12-17 [Health] UID:43034 Activity:nil |
5/12 http://bmj.bmjjournals.com/cgi/content/full/327/7429/1459 \_ "Parachute use to prevent death and major trauma related to gravitational challenge: systematic review of randomised controlled trials" |
2006/5/12-17 [Computer/SW/OS/OsX] UID:43035 Activity:nil |
5/12 Have you used WinXP in Parallels on a new Intel Mac? How is it? |
2006/5/12-16 [Politics/Domestic/911, Politics/Domestic/President/Bush] UID:43036 Activity:nil |
5/12 Wash Post and ABC News conduct overnight poll showing 66% of those polled wouldn't mind if the NSA had a record of phone numbers they had called. 63% also say they feel it's acceptable (41% strongly so) for the NSA to collect phone records of tens of millions of Americans to investigate terrorism. http://csua.org/u/fu4 (Wash Post) \_ In other news, Americans are idiots. -tom \_ :) \_ You know, I don't mind the fact that the database has been collected. I think it is a minimally invasive way to get intel on associates of suspected terrorists. What bothers me is the high-handed unaccountable way Bush did it. He didn't go for any judicial review, warrants, nothing. Not feeling yourself bound by convention, not believing anything limits your power, those are characteristics of a tyrant. --PeterM \_ In other news, only 29% still support the Chimposter: http://news.yahoo.com/s/nm/20060512/pl_nm/bush_poll_dc_1 \_ sloppy reporting from Reuters et al. Good+Excellent vs. Fair+Poor is not the same as Approve vs. Disapprove. \_ http://www.talkingpointsmemo.com/archives/008453.php 53 Percent believe that the NSA has gone too far. |
2006/5/12-16 [Reference/Law/Court] UID:43037 Activity:nil |
5/12 http://csua.org/u/fu5 (Wash Post) Votes for death for Moussaoui were 11-1, 10-2, 10-2 on three death- penalty eligible charges. On the 11-1 vote, jury foreman says the reason for the life in prison vote was never put forth by the dissenter for discussion by the group despite repeated attempts to draw out a reason. \_ I think he's a delusional whack job who did not personally bomb the WTC. he probably wanted to really badly. is that reason enough to improsin him for life ? \_ Yes. Isolating dangeous people from society is one of the big responsibilites of the government. Just because the reason you're crazy is that you're delusional doesn't make you any less dangeous. reason you're dangerous is that you're delusional doesn't make you any less dangerous. \_ So? I'm actually glad to hear you don't have to provide reasons for a decision like this. \_ In a jury room they are supposed to. That's what they're there for. Otherwise we might as well roll dice or draw cards. \_ I thought you had to supply reasons _for_ voting for the death penalty, not against? Or do we have mandatory death penalty for big enough offenses now? I thought it was always a choice between life imprisonment and the whack for murder 1, sufficiently bad treason, terrorism and a very few others, with the jury given the ability to choose between the two if the prosecution asks for the death penalty? -John \_ I'll clarify: I believe the jury should be discussing all their options and everything presented in the case before them before reaching a decision. It sounds like one juror was unwilling to perform their full duty while the other 10-11 tried very hard to do so. If the juror simply didn't believe in the DP then they shouldn't have been allowed on a potential DP trial, but since they didn't speak up we will never know why they voted the way they \_ Ah okay, "should". My question was more, is there a legal requirement for them to justify their vote against the DP lest the judge declare a mistrial or something? -John \_ I don't believe there's a strict legal requirement. As jurors they have a lot of latitude in what and how they deliberate. See "jury nullification". Even so, I still feel they *should* have even if they probably weren't strictly legally required to. \- the term you are looking for is "death qualified" it is constitiional to require jury members be open to capital pushisment in captial cases but that is not a requirement. i dont know if the prosecution asks on a case by case basis during vore dire "we want a death certified jury" or if it is mandated in certain jurisdictions automatically under certain circumstances ... like can you ask for a death certified jury if you are still open to negotiating if you will go for life or death penalty? this is relevant because there have been some studies whether death qualfied juries are more pro-prosecution ... in which case they would want a DQ jury even in a non-capital case. while jury nullification means the jurors never have to give an explanation, they actually can be quite limited in how they negotiate ... like they cant find for a lesser charge unless it is offered to them, and in some cases judges have done things like turned down requests for a dictionary etc. i dont remember the USSC cases on this but no doubt you can find them on the WEEB once you have the right term. did, if there was any reason at all, good, bad, or otherwise. In some sense I feel justice has been robbed. I'd much prefer if they had participated fully in deliberations and it went 12-0 against the DP than 11-1 or 10-2 for, but not knowing. My cynical side says to look for the book hype from juror #12 in the next few weeks. \_ I dunno, my analysis is that the lone standout may have been afraid of getting outed as the one voting against death, and subsequently getting screwed by dumb Americans in terms of privacy, success, and happiness for the rest of his or her natural life. How many 9/11's are there? \_ Fame is fame. If I was the hold out I'd be making mega bucks with in 3 months. No one famous was ever held back by anything but their own stupidity. Look at Hollywood. There are oodles of rich and famous people, many of whom have no talent, education, or anything else going for them, yet there they are. \_ So to summarize: You say maybe it's a book deal, I say maybe the guy's afraid, you say if you were the holdout you'd be making a book deal ... \_ You may wish to read about the case of the United States successful bioinformatics researcher by day / Islamic intellectual by night Ali al-Tamimi. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ali_Al-Tamimi - danh |
2006/5/12-17 [Reference/RealEstate] UID:43038 Activity:nil |
5/12 A tiny little city I live in is going through a major redevelopment process. In 2008, they're going to tear down a huge plaza that was built in the 70s, along with with all the mom&pop stores and replace them with a super mega parking structure, hi-end shops by the marina, an art gallery, etc. At the same time they're going to tear down a mostly empty parking lot to build a 300+ apartment building with lots of mixed use retail/office space on the first floor. My property is 0.5 mile from the land. Is the construction going to devaluate my property? \_ Not unless the new construction is blocking your view or something. Sounds like the changes will put you in a more desirable area in general. general. (Assuming you actually live in a currently desirable/ in-demand area. If there's no demand, and this construction doesn't create it, and it raises your property taxes, then yes, your property value could go down) \_ No, expect your value to go anywhere from up to way way up. Even if you lost a view, the rest should more than make up for it. The only downside is if the new mega mall fails and ends up dormant. Just curious, what city is this? \_ Marina del Rey. The mom&pop stores are in Fisherman's Village. The massive apartments&condos&mixed use buildings are along Via Marina. The construction could take several years so I'm a bit concerned with noise, traffic, and pollution. \_ Marina del Rey?! That's not exactly what I think of as a "tiny little city". I am not sure the megamall is going to make a blip compared to what's already around there (a tiny little city called "Los Angeles"). The real question is whether the new development will be perceived as an improvement, which it probably will. I doubt it will impact property values much, though, as MdR is already sky-high. \_ According to http://www.city-data.com it is 0.9 sq mile. \_ Thank you master of the obvious. The point being that a suburb of LA cannot in all honesty be evaluated as a "tiny little city" even if it really is a "tiny little city". In this case the size of the city isn't a factor like it would be if, say, that megamall is the only one around for miles. MdR is going to be desirable no matter what based on location, not because of (or in spite of) some development unless the development, say, blocks all access to the marina or something. My opinion is that high-end retail will do very well in MdR and will probably be a boon. An exception is if these condos/apartments aren't "luxury" apartments. \_ You forgot to mention tsunami and huricane which will render coastal cities completely worthless \_ Very good Mr. Expert. Who are you and what is your credential wrt Los Angeles? \_ You're looking at an investment. If you try to sell while construction is just beginning or looks unlikely to complete, then yes, you may lose value. Stick it out, though, and your property should improve in value nicely. Sorry to hear about the mom&pop shops, but the mixed-use sounds like good urban planning. |
2006/5/12-17 [Politics/Domestic/California/Arnold] UID:43039 Activity:nil |
5/12 Are there ANY major historical figure who have been left out of the history books because they're gay? http://www.mtv.com/news/articles/1531648/20060512/index.jhtml?headlines=true \_ maybe not left you, but ignored and vilified while they were actually alive \_ or the fact that they were gay just glossed over \_ Did their historical contribution come from being gay? If not, then it seems pretty unrelated. \_ "maybe not left you?" What? \- whether or not people or events are left out of history books has more to do with the climate under which the books are produced than the attributes of the events/people. in america if you want to write about something omitted by somebody else, no external force stops you from doing so. --psb \- BTW, this idea I'm getting at is nicely captured in the title of a recent book on/by STANFRAUD professor RICHARD RORTY: Take Care of Freedom And Truth Will Take Care of Itself. |
2006/5/12-17 [Uncategorized] UID:43040 Activity:nil |
5/12 Have any of you used OpenMake? Our build engineer seems kinda excited about it. We're using Ant now and are reasonably satisfied, but I think she wants to change because she's not too comforable using Ant. |
2006/5/12-17 [Consumer/Camera, Computer/HW/Laptop] UID:43041 Activity:nil |
5/12 What do people use to clean their laptop screens? Mine is full of finger smudges and dust. Thanks. \_ Microfiber towels that I get with my sunglasses. Go to a good optician, they should have some (I think every pair of Ray-Bans you buy comes with one.) Wipe gently. I don't use those moist alcohol screen cleaners, because I haven't found any that don't streak. I use these little towels for my camera lenses too, by the way. If you find something better, please post. -John \_ Microfiber towels that I get with my sunglasses. Go to a good optician, they should have some (I think every pair of Ray-Bans you buy comes with one.) Wipe gently. I don't use those moist alcohol screen cleaners, because I haven't found any that don't streak. I use these little towels for my camera lenses too, by the way. If you find something better, please post. -John |
2006/5/12-16 [Academia/Berkeley/CSUA/Motd] UID:43042 Activity:nil |
5/12 Is it just me or is motdedit hozing a lot of change merges lately? -John \_ If there's any doubt, it's almost definitely you. -mice \_ What happened to /csua/bin/me ? That's what I used to use? |
2006/5/12 [Uncategorized] UID:43043 Activity:nil |
5/12 It's amazing what you'll randomly find using google images: Not work safe! link:csua.org/u/fua |
4/15 |