| ||||||
| 2006/3/28 [Computer/SW/WWW/Browsers] UID:42486 Activity:nil |
3/28 <DEAD>bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=330884<DEAD> Best Firefox bug report evARR!! Okay, maybe second best, there's also the bug that kills babies. -dans \_ Okay, now you've piqued my interest: What's the baby-killing bug? |
| 2006/3/28 [Science/GlobalWarming, Academia/Berkeley/CSUA/Troll] UID:42487 Activity:kinda low |
3/28 A day or two later and the motd doesn't look much like the dans vs
the world show anymore does it? Now it looks like the right-wing
political trolls vs. the left-wing political trolls show. -dans
\_ That must mean that you're overdue for a "snipe at tom" session or
something. You sure you're feeling okay, dans? :P -mice
\_ Point taken.
\_ Please support your statement with facts.
\_ The facts are self-evident. Please get a clue. -dans |
| 2006/3/28 [Politics/Foreign/MiddleEast/Iraq] UID:42488 Activity:low |
3/28 Hey all you armchair intelligence analysts! Here's your chance to be a
star if you can read Arabic and have a lot of free time:
http://fmso.leavenworth.army.mil/products-docex.htm
\_ "Another administration official described the political logic: 'If
anyone in the intelligence community thought there was valid
information in those documents that supported either of those
questions--W.M.D. or Al Qaeda--they would have shouted them from the
rooftops.' ...
\_ "Under pressure from Congressional Republicans ... posting on the
Web 48,000 boxes of Arabic-language Iraqi documents ....
Public doubts about the war have driven Mr. Bush's approval rating
to new lows. A renewed debate over Saddam Hussein's weapons and
terrorist ties could raise the president's standing."
http://www.nytimes.com/2006/03/28/politics/28intel.html |
| 2006/3/28 [Uncategorized] UID:42489 Activity:nil |
3/28 Magnetic Arrow Rest:
http://www.air-rest.com/products.htm |
| 2006/3/28-29 [Politics/Domestic/Election, Politics/Domestic/SocialSecurity] UID:42490 Activity:nil 80%like:42493 |
3/28 Why do Congress and the president hate the Constitution?
http://www.aei.org/publications/filter.all,pubID.24057/pub_detail.asp
\_ 'cause it limits their power. Duh.
\_ cuz the 2nd amendment is the only true limit on their power left
\_ Did you mean "nearly every politician"?
\_ Not particularly.. |
| 2006/3/28-29 [Politics/Domestic/Immigration] UID:42491 Activity:nil |
3/28 Open letter to the media re: "Immigrants"
http://alisavaldesrodriguez.blogspot.com/2006/03/how-stupid-are-us-media.html
\_ Interesting article. Too bad 1/2 of the Americans will ignore
it because it's written by a Mexican or it's too liberal to read.
\_ Can't argue with that. Well, except 16.
\_ Sure you can.
Of her point 1: No, 40% of the Hispanic population was foreign-
born. http://www.infoplease.com/spot/hhmcensus1.html
Of point 3: No, 40% foreign-born, and there are at least 4.8M
more illegal Hispanic immigrants. So combining the 2 stats,
accounting for the exclusion of non-Mexican Hispanics in the
4.8M illegal immigrants, it's pretty hard to say conclusively
one way or the other whether a majority of Latinos in the US
are immigrants. link:csua.org/u/fct
Of point 4: Yes, but legal immigrants are dominated by people
from Asia and Latin America. In 2004, of 945K immigrants,
314K are from Asia and 385K are from non-Canada Americas.
While it is interesting that there are 100K Nigerians living
in Houston, that is just so much trivia. A discussion on
immigration is a discussion about Asians and Hispanics.
Since 68% of illegal aliens come from Mexico alone, a discussion
about illegal immigration is a discussion about Mexicans and
other Hispanics.
Of point 9: Given point 3, this is highly unlikely.
Of point 13: http://csua.org/u/fcw [usatoday] |
| 2006/3/28-29 [Transportation/Bicycle] UID:42492 Activity:nil |
3/28 Looking for a good place on the web to buy bicycle accessories.
Looking for a nice LED headlight (they last near forever right?),
rear rack to put books, decent pump, patching accessories, and
a little utility bag to put the patching accessories. I've
considered my local bike shop but after looking at their super
overpriced Kryptonite locks (cost 2X as much as web) I decided
that it's a bad idea to buy any accessory from them.
\_ http://nashbar.com
\_ Here are some web-based bike shops I like:
http://www.biketoolsetc.com
http://www.lickbike.com
\_ LICK BIKE!
http://www.cambriabike.com
http://www.biketiresdirect.com
http://www.jensonusa.com
http://sheldonbrown.com/harris
I highly recommend the topeak road morph pump if you're looking
for one to take with you on your bike. LED headlights strike me
as the best of the low end, but if you're going to spend lots of
time riding at night, I think HID headlights are worth their higher
prices. Get a taillight, too. If you're taking a patch kit along,
don't forget to take a spare tube because it takes a while for the
glue (well, cold vulcanizing fluid really) to cure. If you patch
a tube then try to use it immediately, it'll just peel off under
the pressure. |
| 2006/3/28 [Politics/Domestic/Election, Politics/Domestic/SocialSecurity] UID:42493 Activity:nil 80%like:42490 |
3/28 Why does the president and Congress hate the Constitution?
http://www.aei.org/publications/filter.all,pubID.24057/pub_detail.asp |
| 2006/3/28-29 [Reference/Tax] UID:42494 Activity:nil |
3/28 I bought a piece of unoccupied property and got it appraised at X,
which was slightly above the listed price. Now that I moved in
and doing a refi, the loan officer says I need to do an
"owner occupied" appraisal. How is this going to affect my tax
and other things? If tax and fees will be based on it, is it
possible to make my place a total mess and hope to devaluate the
appraisal? Is there any advantage of getting it appraised
higher? I understand how silly this question sounds. Need advice.
\_ Appraisal does not change your property tax.
\_ It would not be a good idea to make the place a dump as
this would probably give the bank an action for waste
against you. If you really make a terrible mess of the
place, they might even be able to call in your loan and
foreclose. |
| 2006/3/28-29 [Uncategorized] UID:42495 Activity:nil |
3/28 A conservative's take on Dubya's guest worker program
link:csua.org/u/fcs (work-safe) |
| 2006/3/28-29 [Science/Space] UID:42496 Activity:nil |
3/28 What are some of the silly things you do to save money?
I'll start. I don't water my lawn, it's all dirt. It cuts down
water bills, saves gardener bills, and conserves water. I also
don't flush my toilet unless I poo, or when I have guests over.
What do you do to save money?
\_ I SHOP AT WALMART and support my Conservative kind. I RULE!!!
\_ I use yermom as my ho of choice. Much cheaper.
\_ Don't you have to spend money on gas or electricity to weed-whack
the dirt all spring?
\_ You sound like a moron.
\_ Utilities: All CFL bulbs where reasonable, CF torch instead of
halogen, programmable thermostat set sensibly, shower less than
once-a-day when not needed, double-paned windows, set blinds
appropriate to season.
\_ Instead of wasting excess resources, I made one trip to the hardware
store where I got a crowbar and a fair sized axe and went to work
on my neighbor's place so I always have material for my fireplace.
\_ This sounds like Chateau.
\_ I set a tech toys budget and stick to it. Less chance of
of 'accidentally' buying an expensive new gadget.
\_ "If it's yellow, leave it mellow, if it's brown, flush it down."
but that's vestigal from growing up during a drought.
\_ No car, no cable tv. Maybe that is not silly enough.
\_ I piped my neighbor's heating duct into my house. He is in the
other half of my duplex so it was easy. I also use his wife, which
saves maintenance costs.
\_ You need to do a budget analysis. Where are you spending
most of your money? Then cut it down accordingly by going
where you will get the "most bang for your buck". Unless
your water bill is high, not flushing the toilet probably
won't make as big of a difference than say eat out less.
The $10 I save not eating out today equals to a lot of your
silly flushes! |
| 2006/3/28-29 [Politics/Foreign/Asia/China, Computer/Rants] UID:42497 Activity:nil |
3/28 "This nonsense of 'jobs Americans won't do' is an age-old lie that's
been around as long as the republic. Prior to the illegal alien
problem, the same excuse was applied to the perpetuation of slavery.
Georgia Representative James Jackson rose in opposition to a Quaker
petition to end slavery in 1790 by fuming 'that rice cannot be brought
to market without these people [slaves].' William Loughton Smith added
that slavery was an economic precondition for prosperity of his
constituents, as author Joseph Ellis noted in his book, Founding
Brothers . 'Such is the state of agriculture,' Smith said, 'that no
white man would perform the tasks.' "
http://www.philvalentine.com/IllegalAlienMyth.htm
\_ this is stupid. everyone knows 'jobs Americans won't do' means
'jobs Americans won't do at the current wages'. There will be
people willing to do almost anything if the price is high enough.
\_ And yet that keeps getting dropped in conversation. And people
keep acting as if "Americans" won't do the jobs under any
circumstance.
\_ yea, but the question is "why pay a higher wage when
someone is willing to do it at a lower wage?". It's
laws vs economics. The biggest loser? Probably black
males whose plight has been deteriorating even during
the prosperous 90s. Unemployment isn't high for other
ethnic and gender groups. If you didn't graduate from
high school, yes, your livelihood would likely be
affected by the many illegal aliens, but otherwise,
you likley won't be affected and may even benefit from a
cost standpoint.
\_ This post seems like a non sequitur to me. The point
is that the employment at the lower wages is illegal,
and talking about "jobs Americans won't do" implies
all sorts of things which is why people say that. I've
seen it raised on the motd, as in "how are you gonna
get fresh produce???!11/??"
\_ yea, and slavery was legal, so please explain
how the comparison with slavery makes sense.
\_ slavery was an abomination and is now outlawed
everywhere in the world but places you'd never set
foot in. what does the legal status of slavery in
this country 150+ years ago in _some_ states have to
do with whether or not slavery is ok or the price of
berry picking or anything else today?
\_ exactly, thus the quote op posted is stupid.
\_ So the point is 'Jobs American's won't do (for how little we want
to pay )'. However, if the employery were to offer to pay what
it would take to get Americans to work them, would those jobs
still exist?
\_ If they need to exist. Some would and some would not. The
net effect is more jobs for "Americans", although perhaps
fewer jobs overall.
\_ nah, it will further increase cost of doing business in
the US, and trigger more outsourcing, and moving of
factories and jobs overseas.
\_ You can't outsource most of these kinds of jobs or
that would've already been done. These people are
maids, day laborers, farm hands, and the like. Some
businesses will fold because of the increased cost of
doing business and some won't. Mostly, I think it
will be the same amount of $$$ spread out across
fewer employees in aggregate.
\_ I don't know. The janitorial and cafeteria
people at my company are all hispanics. So are
the people keeping the company's lawn looking good,
as are the movers, drivers, etc. Cost of
doing business will increase as living costs
increase. Nobody is talking about outsourcing
these jobs, but the rise in cost of doing
business. As it is, we aren't having an
easy time competing with China and India.
\_ Well, someone above *did* write "trigger more
outsourcing" and "mov[e]... factories and jobs
overseas." I imagine the cafeteria staff at your
company is not comprised of illegal aliens.
Gardeners may be. I know that it costs a lot more to
have a gardener in places w/o a lot of illegals,
even in places where the cost of living is much
lower. So fewer people will have gardeners and the
gardeners that are hired will make more money, but
will probably be better gardeners. I know an
old-time tree trimmer and his company has been
driven to the brink of bankruptcy by competition
with illegal aliens who aren't arborists, but who
charge 1/3 the price for the work such as they
do it. The cost of doing business will increase,
but so will the average wage. More money will
stay in the USA, instead of being sent to family
abroad. Somehow Europe manages to stay competitive
despite higher wages and a higher standard of
living. Competing with China and India on price
alone is a recipe for disaster, anyway. Maybe
people wouldn't need to shop at Wal-Mart for
Chinese-made crap if they had more money in
their pockets.
\_ Yes, the costs will rise. Or they won't. And we'll
go on with life.
\_ life's pretty good as it is today.
\_ life was pretty good with slavery.
\_ slaves did not come voluntarily. |
| 2006/3/28-31 [Reference/Law/Court, Industry/Startup] UID:42498 Activity:moderate 79%like:42509 |
3/28 Hi, let's say there's a small corporation. The number of authorized
shares is 1,000,000. All 1,000,000 shares are issued, and employees
are granted 10% of that, and the founder grants himself 90%. What's
to prevent the founder from voting to double the number of
authorized shares to 2,000,000 and screwing the employees with 2x
dilution? Other than all the employees getting pissed and leaving.
\_ The board can do anything. If you're a staffer and want to sue,
you're welcome to but good luck on that. You'll spend way more
on lawyers than whatever you might have regained in a lawsuit and
probably won't win anyway.
\_ Word of advice, if the chair/founder/whatever is Ari Zilka, leave.
He'll take most of the money and leave you suckers with
almost nothing.
\_ Please tell me more of the Ari Zilka story (I've heard rumors)
\_ If I tell you the story my identity will be exposed.
Let's just say that he's born with special privileges in a
well connected family and feels entitled to do whatever he
pleases without regard to the well beings of the people
who works for him. Back then he and the VCs had deep inner
connections and they knew how to get around "the system"
very well. They knew how to make up rules and and before
you know it, checkmate. You no longer have any legal
protection and you're of no use to them. Ari is one
fine example of why the rich get richer.
\_ Nothing. But, generally this is why small corporations have
boards, and, if memory serves, the board must be at least 3 people,
and, once a corporation gets to a certain number of employees, the
board gets bigger. -dans
\_ What if two of the three positions on the board of directors
is occupied by the founder and his wife, in which case the
are occupied by the founder and his wife, in which case the
founder will always get the majority vote?
\_ Welcome to the wonderful world of business.
\- Is the founder's name RIGAS? --psb
\_ Then you're fucked. Not sure, but there *may* be laws
against this because of conflicts of interest. -dans
\_ Merely issuing more shares would not directly screw the employees.
If he did something like say grant himself 1,000,000 new shares
that could be grounds for a shareholder lawsuit but good luck.
\_ What about doubling the number of authorized shares?
\_ That's basically the same as issuing treasury stock... it
only matters when it actually changes hands.
\_ We just started covering this in my bus org/corp law class. The
way I understand it majority controlling shareholders have a
fiduciary duty wrt to the minority shareholders. In the scenario
you describe the maj shareholder has effectively reduced the
voting power of the min shareholders by 1/2 (assuming that each
of the new shares has one vote and the voting power of the old
stock did not increase). By acting this way the maj shareholder
has breached his fiduciary duty and the min shareholders can sue
him for this breach.
[ I might have this wrong, so I'll ask my bus org prof on thurs ]
\_ Can the dude with 90% also pay himself a big salary, and thus
take away all the profits of the company?
\_ Yes, but the minority shareholders could almost certainly sue
him because he is not working in the best interests of the
shareholders. -dans
\_ Who is Ari Zilka? -dans
\_ ari@csua
\_ what goes around, comes around. hopefully he'll get
his just due.
\_ He paid his dues when he married chris@soda.
\_ I don't think there is anything realistic stopping this behavior.
However, most (not every) leaders realize that by sharing the
wealth the company has much better chances of success, as everyone's
interests then align for the good of the corporation. It's better
to own 25% of a billion dollar corporation than to own 90% of a
$10 million dollar corporation.
\_ Yes, but it's relatively much easier to create a $10M company
than a $1B company. Taking the chance of success into account,
and also taking into account (to use the numbers from your
example) most people would value $9M more than 9/250 of $250M,
maybe it's a better strategy to shoot for the 90% of $10M.
\_ Except a lot of leaders of companies already HAVE that
much money. I'm pretty sure my founding CEO was.
much money. I'm pretty sure my founding CEO did. |
| 2006/3/28-30 [Science/Biology] UID:42499 Activity:nil |
3/28 On the 30th anniversary of _The Republican Gene_.
http://www.edge.org/3rd_culture/selfish06/selfish06_index.html |
| 2006/3/28-30 [Politics/Foreign/MiddleEast/Israel] UID:42500 Activity:moderate |
3/28 Likud seems to have been kicked upside the head in today's vote. Can
someone who knows Israeli politics better comment?
\_ Frontline on Ch 9 has something on this right now (~ 9:30 PM)
\_ Sharon tolerated Likud because he needed them. Likud negated their
credibility on security concerns by acting like a bunch of paranoid
naysayers, buddying up with religious lunatics (whom a lot of secular
Israelis blame for inciting violence with the Palestinians), and by
the fact that despite/because of Sharon pulling out of Gaza and acting
unilaterally, bombs haven't been going off. -John
\_ Here's a different point of view: Sharon was a core member of Likud,
one of the leaders of this conservative, secular party. Due to the
way the Israeli multi-party parliament works, Likud was forced to
join with the far right religious party to form a government which
meant the FRR-party got a small number of higher level government
positions which they naturally used to further their agenda. As
far as the violence goes, it was reduced dramatically after Israel
closed the borders and built walls/fences. There was a lesser
reduction in attacks when Sharon later unilaterally pulled several
settlements out of the Gaza strip and certain West Bank areas. More
recently, just before his stroke, he declared he was leaving Likud
and forming a new centrist party. His policies had already left
him in a position where he was likely to lose his Likud position
so he had nothing to lose by leaving although less astute political
commentators at the time called this daring and brave. It was
really his earlier actions that left him in an untenable position
in his party that were daring and brave and forming a new party
was the logical next step. It should go without saying that after
Arafat died of some unknown disease in a French hospital and his
wife was left in Paris with the hundreds of millions of EU and US
cash he had looted the level of violence turned way down again but
that has nothing to do directly with Israeli politics.
\_ Nice, but where can I find some hot right-wing Israeli women?
\_ On any Israeli bus, at any Israeli disco, or in any Israeli
pizza parlor, but you'd be putting yourself at serious risk
of being killed by a suicidal palestinian. For your needs,
might I suggest usenet, your imagination, and your hand? At
least that way you'll get some satisfaction.
\_ Hillel on Bancroft
\_ I think there are legal brothels in Tel Aviv.
\_ Are there any hot right-wing Israeli women here in the
Berkeley? Is there an Israel Student Association or
something?
Berkeley? Maybe an Israel Student Association?
\_ Mmmmm, sex slaves from eastern Europe... good plan.
\_ Are there any hot right-wing Israeli women here in
Berkeley? We can play David and Bathsheba all night
long.
\_ Mills. Seriously. |
| 2006/3/28-29 [Computer/Rants] UID:42501 Activity:nil |
3/28 So the House passed an immigration bill which uses the stick approach.
The Senate (subcommittee) passed a very different bill which is almost
the opposite of the House bill. Assuming the full Senate passes their
version as-is, how do they go about resolving the differences? I know
the general idea and I can see how they can split the difference on
spending bills and such but what has happened in the past on bills
like this where spending and taxes aren't the primary issue?
\_ Bill Frist will not allow the senate version on the schedule, and
will try and force through the house version with minor alterations.
Barring that, they may just say "Yeah, they're the same" and pass
them on to the President to sign, ala the AEI link below... |
| 2006/3/28-29 [Transportation/Bicycle] UID:42502 Activity:nil |
3/28 My bicycle has a weight limit of 350 pounds. I weigh 150 and my
gf weighs 100. Is there such a thing as a rear seat/rear rack
adapter I can put on my bicycle so that I can start carrying
her for fun?
\_ http://www.ananova.com/news/story/sm_1353878.html |
| 2006/3/28-29 [Transportation/Car, Transportation/Motorcycle] UID:42503 Activity:nil |
3/28 Tonight's NOVA is about the DARPA vehicle challenge:
http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/nova/darpa |
| 2006/3/28-30 [Politics/Foreign/Asia/China, Recreation/Food/Alcohol] UID:42504 Activity:high |
3/29 http://www.viceland.com/int/v13n3/htdocs/coffee.php?country=us Another choice is Chinese food. Chinese-food restaurants above 96th street are as ubiquitous as Starbucks coffee shops are in the rest of the city, but they look like Mao designed them. A table or two, a metal grill door, and two or three gas jets is all you're getting. Also, the employees are actually Chinese, and by that I mean two weeks ago they were in China. I always feel bad for these guys. Their average height is about 5'3", they weigh maybe 95 pounds, and they speak no English. And these are the DELIVERYMEN! Not surprisingly, they get robbed with alarming frequency. Hell, most women could kick their asses. I always like to speculate what these guys' lives are like as I take a report and try to find the kids who took their $42 and BBQ spare ribs. One day you're in China, kicking around the countryside, checking on your crops, then three days later you're on the 25th floor of a housing project with a bleeding lip and no money, trying to explain to me what happened with the 25 English words you know. They keep coming over, though, so I can't help but think, "Damn, Communist China must really, really suck." \_ aspolito has a huge ass. \_ Most of the Chinese restaurant workers who came here illegally are from Fuzhou, China. I read a wsj article a year or two ago saying that the Fuzhou people no longer care to come to the US, because China's economy is booming and there are better opportunities there. That's why these days, I noticed they are being quickly replaced by Mexicans. At its height, the Fuzhou guys have a really good network. Dump one of them in Fuzhou-nese have a really good network. Dump one of them in any US city, and he would be able to find someone from his hometown, and thus find work and housing, and make a living, albeit a not very good one, relatively speaking. hometown, and thus find work and housing, and survive. Their superb overseas network was one of the reasons why many of them were able to come the US to work for a while, make some money, and then go home. money, and then go home. Fuzhou is part of the Fujian province. The Fujianese, together with Cantonese, Hakkas, Teochews, make up a big part of the Chinese diaspora, and dominate the economies of Taiwan, Hongkong, Thailand, Malaysia, Indonesia, Singapore and Filipines. These dialect groups are all from poor fringe coastal regions of southern China, though the Hakkas always believed they have royal northern bloodlines, and migrated south when northern China was invaded. The poverty of these regions resulted in a tradition of emigration and entrepreneurship. \_ That's nice. So which group has the prettiest women? \_ Are you angry because even they have a job, while you don't? \_ Are you angry because they have a job, while you don't? \_ I'm not angry. I thought it was a funny writing piece. I hope the recent Chinese immigrants assimulate into my country and lead productive satisfying lives but something tells me they won't. \_ You are easily amused. \_ That's what people always say about new immigrants. What usually happens is the first generation doesn't assimilate very much and ends up middle class but their kids do fine. \_ I would settle for "ending up middle class". Nothing wrong with that. \_ Not to Chinese. Haven't you noticed how hard they make their kids study and they all have to be doctors and lawyers? Middle class is failure. \_ Yeah but 1st generation don't end up doctors and lawyers, but a helluva lot better than when they were FOB. \_ Actually, I've been meeting quite a few first generation doctors and lawyers lately. Seems like they have made it easier for foreigners to become doctors in the US. This is bad. These jobs should be reserved for Americans, and first generation foreigners should stick to restaurant work. \- i think the AMAs efforts to make it harder for indian and russian doctors to practice here is well known. \_ Foreign doctors need to pass the same board exams everyone else does to practice here. \- See e.g. particularly section on physicians: http://www.cepr.net/publications/professional_supplement.htm I didnt know about the clinical skills exam that is only given in Philadelphia. Also, a tricky part of this is how to "distinguish" between american who went to foreign medical schools because they couldnt get into med school here and foreigners trained in their home country who want to come here. in addition of visa-obtaining issues, and language testing, there is the "fifth pathway" program. I am not an expert on this but it's well understood that self-regulating bodies like the ABA and AMA engage in "income protection" plans under the guise of "public safety" [yes, irconic reference to french rev], see e.g. the nolo v texas case. BTW, I am not suggesting foreign trained doctors are as well trained, but this is an area where the outcomes area heavily dictated by regulation rather the "free mkt". http://www.cepr.net/publications/professional_supplement.htm \_ Sorry but those comments just spew of complete ignorance. If 1st generation-ers are competent and contribute in a meaningful way, there should be nothing wrong with that. Do you somehow believe you should have natural right to having everything spoon fed to you? \_ I hope they do well too, but I like them doing their own thing, which adds diversity and spice to my country. \_ Sorry, but I have more sympathy for our kids who get sent to places like Vietnam and Iraq, and come back missing a leg, a ball, and half a dick, angry and confused as to how they got their arse kicked by 80 pounds, 4'9" vietnamese peasant hags and stone age desert tribes. Just browse through the "Names of the Dead" ... 18 years old ... 21 years old ... all tender, fresh and innocent. What a waste. \_ Good one. It's sad to see our brave soldiers maimed there and then come back to the states and wait on the freeway with the sign "Vietnam War Soldier Spare a Dime." In addition I have to say that these tiny little Viet soldiers on the other side did quite a bit of damage despite their lack of equipments and trainings. If tiny little men can do big jobs, it makes you go hmmmmm. Lastly on my rant I'd like to commend these tiny little men who reproduce really hot Vietnamese women \_ I am glad you've found solace with tiny little men. Vietnamese girls are not my cup of tea, but hey, if they are a fit for you, whom am I to object. At least you didn't become a pedophile. \_ If it weren't for tiny little women there would be more pedofiles in America. -op \_ thanks for sharing your sexual disposition with us. \_ I don't think they were confused. I think it's pretty clear that a 4'9" 80 lbs stone age vietnamese desert tribe peasant can kill you when armed with modern weapons in a proxy war fighting on their own turf. Angry? Probably. Confused? Not likely. A waste? Yes, of course, big time. \_ Maybe I didn't phrase it right, but I meant confused in the sense of "WTF am I doing in this hellhole getting killed?! I don't belong here. I want my mom!" \_ Not the ones I know who have been in combat. \_ Really? How then did so many of them beoome depressed, suicidal, alcohol and drug addicts, etc.? \_ What is "so many"? And how does that percent compare to the general population who was never in the military? Obviously it is an anecdotal sample set but all the ones I know are normal people who came back and got on with their lives. We've sent millions overseas in the 20th century. Our society is not overrun by millions of depressed, suicidal, alcoholic drug addicted ex-soldiers. (But is overrun by millions of depressed, drug addicted civilians). \_ "percent"? "general population"? "sample set"? Sorry, this is too hard. I am American. I watch teevee, and teevee says they're depressed and suicidal. \_ You are right. I am wrong. |
| 2006/3/28-29 [Politics/Domestic/California] UID:42505 Activity:nil |
3/28 http://tinyurl.com/ep643 14 Walmart stores in Northern Cal, none in the peninsula. What's up? |
| 2006/3/28-30 [Uncategorized] UID:42508 Activity:nil |
3/28 http://local.live.com/default.aspx?v=2&cp=34.212651~-118.660726&style=o&lvl=1&scene=3064367 Is this an example of how suburbs grow? First they carve out the road and then they build houses on top of it? \_ Are you FOB? \_ yeah I FOB, how that relevant? \_ They've gotta get the trucks in there somehow... |
| 5/17 |