| WIKI | FAQ | Tech FAQ | |
 http://csua.com/feed/ | |
| ||||||
| 2006/3/14 [Recreation/Dating] UID:42222 Activity:high |
3/14 got my gf to get on the pill so that we could do bareback but later
she got off the pill cuz she didn't like it. then she started to
deny some anal. then no anal, at all. then only regular vaginal sex
if i using condoms. then only thick condoms. then less sex like
\_ why?
once every two weeks. now, no sex, at all. all this in a 3 year
time span. is this like, normal? it's my fourth relationship and
the same thing happens every single relationship. sex life is
good in the beginning but always gets worse and worse
till it no longer exists. please don't delete, i wanna ask
how other sodans cope with this problem. do u take anti-depressants
or go to shrinks?
\_ You should go to a church and convert to Christianity. They
teach you that you don't need anything else except to love God
and love from God. As long as there's God, you'll be happy.
My gf stopped having sex with me after her Christian friends
convinced her that pre-marrital sex is bad. Now we both go to
church and no longer have sex. I'm not happy about it at all
but like she says, give God a chance. I'll give him a year then
accept it, or just move on. Halleluja, God is great!
\_ Remember: God doesn't want you to be happy.
\_ ? you're nuts if you're not a troll. It's over. Move on.
\_ why don't you just get married?
\_ For some women, there's indication that the pill might
permanently kill their sex drive. Maybe that's what happened to
her. Does she want to fuck other men?
\_ Um, that sounds like bullshit to me. Loaded bullshit at that.
Kindly point me to evidence (preferably rigorous study, but I'll
take an abundance of anecdotal evidence). -dans
\_ The pill can cause all sorts of unpleasant side effects that
make sex difficult or impractical, but I've never heard of it
actually killing the sex DRIVE. Perhaps the PP is thinking of
antidepressants? --!pp
\_ No, it's not normal, yes, it does happen, yes, it sucks. No
answer for you.
\_ On the contrary, I think it is completely normal for the
frequency of sex to diminish over time. It doesn't always
happen, but it happens enough to be normal. She's bored
of you. Either dump her or resign yourself to a lifetime
of this. What does she say when you ask her about it (not
that it matters, because you will hear all sorts of stories)?
I've been there, done that, read the books, seen the
therapist, and it boils down to some bitches (a lot of them,
in fact) are just like that. There are a lot of reasons why
and you won't be able to fix most of them. My suggestion is
to move on and go get yourself another hot, willing chick.
The French and Italians would say that if she's a good life
partner otherwise then perhaps you just need a mistress.
\_ And if you think a guy who talks about "some bitches" and
"hot, willing chick[s]" has any useful advice, please return
your Cal diploma before you embarrass yourself and us.
\_ You take things too literally. Yermom doesn't count
as valid experience. Sometimes you have to call
bitches bitches and not sugarcoat things.
\_ Done. You're an idiot.
\_ This makes me laugh. I'm gonna guess you are
a "sensitive male". You gotta call a bitch a
bitch and a ho a ho.
\_ Good. Now you're a laughing idiot.
\_ I disagree. I think he's just been around the
block a few times more than you. -someone else
\_ Unfortunately, this has nothing to do with
his idiocy.
\_ I'm an idiot because I call a chick
who stops putting out a bitch? You
know what I call one that *does* put
out? A slut!
\_ geeks behind their computer talking
tough always make me laugh.
- someone else
\_ heh, yeah -- this guy's pretty
entertaining.
\_ and don't forget, the above
poster could be a girl
\_ Thank you! I'll be at the
Stardust Lounge all week.
\_ heh, np! :P
\_ When you have sex, is there anything in it for her? (i.e. does she
come every time?)
\_ She just wants to break up with you but is being passive agressive
about it. Ask her about your sex life, but be prepared to move on.
Not "all women" are like this, but the ones that are tired of you
are. |
| 2006/3/14-15 [Politics/Domestic/California] UID:42223 Activity:low |
3/14 Anyone ever heard of these guys? Are they legit? The lack of
contact info seems a bit odd: http://safedealexchange.com -John
\_ I thought this might indicate they _weren't_ legit, but on
further consideration it might merely indicate that someone
copied their license number / address.
http://www.corp.ca.gov/pub/consumeralerts.htm#071505 -niloc
\_ Probably bogus. See http://www.corp.ca.gov/fsd/lic -niloc
\_ Turns out they are bogus, without looking up any BBB or
Dept. of Corporations info; their whois RIR is in
Thailand. Thanks though. -John
\_ The misspelled affiliates. Probably a scam. -ausman
\_ The misspelled affiliates. Probably a scam. From
http://www.carbuyingtips.com/fraud.htm
"Escrow sites with the word "Safe" or "Secure" in their name
are neither safe, nor secure."
\_ That seems like kind of a bizarre generalization, except that
in this case it seems to apply... :-) -John |
| 2006/3/14 [Reference/Religion] UID:42224 Activity:very high |
3/14 Hail moroni
http://myspace-784.vo.llnwd.net/00565/48/79/565859784_l.jpg
http://i23.photobucket.com/albums/b373/remember-this/000_1220.jpg
-motd boob guy
\_ Her name is Moroni? Huh?
\_ Is she supposed to be a Mormon?
\_ Those are pretty small Mormons. Try these:
link:tinyurl.com/rxqq9
link:tinyurl.com/kk8ua
link:tinyurl.com/nncwu
\_ Those are micro!
http://www.divinebreasts.com/bigtits/alicia/02/Large/8.jpg
http://www.divinebreasts.com/bigtits/alicia/05/Large/1.jpg
http://www.divinebreasts.com/bigtits/alicia/01/Large/2.jpg |
| 2006/3/14-16 [Computer/Networking] UID:42225 Activity:moderate |
3/14 Can someone reccomend a restaurant or Cafe in the SF financial
district (say near Montgomery BART) that has free WiFi, decent food
and reasonable prices?
\_ it's getting harder and harder to find free/open wifi spots. It makes
me sad.
\_ really? I'd thought it was going the other way... (more free
spots nowadays) - do you mean in SF specifically?
\_ I'm finding fewer free APs, both from "big, legit" providers
(ISPs, telcos) and from misconfigurations; the big ones tend
to want to sell wifi service, while people are cluing in
to closing up their APs. However, I see a lot more small
"independent" APs, such as from small coffee shops, these
days. This is true of most of the countries I've been to
recently. And running an AP off the third interface off a
DMZ interface of a small firewall and allowing free
Internet access to anyone (but rate-limiting non-
authenticated clients to, say, 10-20% of overall bandwidth)
is a nice way to give back. -John
\_ free wifi is a form of Socialism; I pay a bit more to let others
share, in hoping that others will do the same for me when I need
it in their area. As we all learned in grade school, Socialism
is BAD and Capitalism is GOOD! GO GWB OUR GREATEST HERO!!!
\_ I'm pretty sure you're being sarcastic, but I'm going to
point this out anyway. There's nothing socialist about most
free wifi. Everywhere I've been outside of the bay area
it's normal for coffee shops and restraunts to have their
wifi be free, because it encourages people to hang out there.
It's just good business.
\_ except when people overstay their welcome and leave less
room for incoming customers.
\_ Yeah it's like Darfur out there.
\_ Yeah, this is actually a big problem in SF. I don't
know where the person who can't find free wifi is
looking, because every coffee shop I know of in SF has
free wifi. And they are all filled with these goddamn
drones who come in, buy one cup of coffee, and then
sit down for a whole day occupying precious table
space with themselves and their bloody laptop.
The coffeeshop around the corner from my apartment
literally has no place to sit during the day, because
the entire place has effectively become an office
full of laptop-wielding drones. I say charge for the
damn wifi and end this stupid tragedy of the commons.
\_ You know what's funny? I'm guessing that you think
government-sponsored free wifi is EVIL SOCIALISM.
But if the coffee shops charged huge fees and the
professionals who spend all day there wrote those
fees of on their taxes as business expenses (which
most of them probably could do) you'd think that
was just fine, even though it would be a much larger
subsidy by the rest of the taxpayers. Socialism
for the rich, capitalism for the poor.
\_ You should accidentally spill coffee on someone's
laptop. Like once a week.
\_ Wow. Your assessment is very scientific. As a
rational observer, I'm convinced that clearly free
wifi will lead to the downfall of western
civilization. -dans
\_ Harvest & Rowe on 2nd between Market and Mission.
\_ Ooh, that looks good but I should have mentioned I'm looking for
a place open around dinner. -OP |
| 2006/3/14-16 [Uncategorized] UID:42226 Activity:nil |
3/14 Rat-Squirrel is actually an ancient species:
http://edition.cnn.com/2006/TECH/science/03/09/species.survivor.ap |
| 2006/3/14-16 [Computer/SW/Languages/Misc] UID:42227 Activity:nil |
3/14 I think someone's using an auto script to add the moroni big boob
post. Anyone else would like to confirm it?
\_ why do you care?
\_ Moroni (if that's her name) is hot.
\_ url?
\_ http://myspace-784.vo.llnwd.net/00565/48/79/565859784_l.jpg
<DEAD>i23.photobucket.com/albums/b373/remember-this<DEAD>
000_1220.jpg
\_ Eh. -dans |
| 2006/3/14-16 [Science/GlobalWarming] UID:42228 Activity:kinda low |
3/14 "Global warming gases at highest levels ever: UN"
http://news.yahoo.com/s/nm/20060314/ts_nm/environment_greenhouse_dc
\_ And it will accelerate in the coming decades as we switch to
more Carbon-heavy sources of energy like Coal, and burn vasts
tracts of forest to plant "carbon-neutral" feedstocks for biofuels.
Even if Europe and the United States get their act together
(unlikely) and actually reduce their CO2 & greenhouse gas emissions
that will be quickly undone by China & India's booming industry.
\_ Why do we care? We've already been told that Global Warming is
irreversible. Personally, I burn tires for warmth. -emarkp
\_ CO2 is one of the global warming gases. Do your part to cut down
on its production. Stop breathing.
on its release. Stop breathing.
\_ I think it would work better if you did, actually -- then we'd
be left with one guy that gives a damn, and one fewer motd
trolls.
\_ But the point is, why should we care? Unless you have
children or are under the age of ten by the time the
shit really hits the fan we'll all be really old or dead.
There also isn't much we can do about it. I think that we
need to let technology take care of the problem or just
live with the consequences. It's akin to caring about whether
or not the Big One will hit the bay area. Nobody can really
do anything about it, so most of us just don't care. It's
unfortunately a cynical way to view global warming, but it
is realistic.
\_ ie, "I'm going to get mine because it's all about me,
no matter who dies."
\_ Ahhh, nihilism.
\_ So in your moral framework, we should not care about it
because it only affects our children? You suck. (Actually
it is already starting to have effects and will continue
within our lifetimes.)
\_ I sure hpe it hurries up. Then I can turn off my space
heater and save on my monthly electricity bill.
\_ Just wait til you see your AC bill, fucker.
\_ Surveys say 100 out of 100 scientists who depend on global warming
fright for continued resarch funding say global warming will kill
us all unless funding continues.
\_ By this standard, we should never believe anything any scientists
tell us. I'm sure that's not what you meant to imply, and you
were just trolling.
\_ By what standard? All scientists do *not* acquire funding
through fear mongering. Most of them get funding by saying,
"Hey I found this cool thing and if you give me more money,
I can probably make something useful from it". I wasn't
trolling. I think the global warming 'scientists' have a
vested interest in fear mongering. Population explosions,
global cooling, global warming, running out of [food, water,
oil, various minerals, arable land, etc], and global warming
is just the latest scare tactic for cash. The sky is not
falling.
\_ The sky might not be falling, but the sea (level) is
already rising.
\_ At .0004mm per year? Ok. I'm scared now. You got me.
\_ guess you don't live in New Orleans
\_ Actually it's 1-2mm per year for the past 100 years.
-tom
\_ Which might zoom up if say, all the ice on
Greenland decides to melt. Everyone into the
Hummer! |
| 2006/3/14-15 [Uncategorized] UID:42229 Activity:nil |
3/14 STOP OVERWRITING. |
| 2006/3/14-16 [Uncategorized] UID:42230 Activity:nil |
3/14 I'm used to KDE 3.0.5 and my machine at work was upgraded to 3.3.1.
Konsole doesn't seem to have an option to move the tab bar to the
left side of the screen anymore. Is there any way to get it to do
this? |
| 2006/3/14-16 [Politics/Domestic/California, Politics/Domestic/President/Bush] UID:42231 Activity:nil |
3/14 New CBS poll with Bush at 34% breaks down party affilation this way:
32% GOP
32% Dems
36% Ind
So what's the new talking point? For reference, the last poll had
the "controversial" breakdown of:
28% GOP
40% Dems
32% Ind
\_ I believe the 32% / 32% numbers are unweighted (they asked about
the same raw number of Dems and Republicans).
However, all results have been weighted so that Dems represent
34% and Republicans represent 29%, for the most recent CBS poll.
As for the previous CBS poll, my guess is that the 28% / 40% numbers
were also the raw number of people asked, and they again weighted to
~34% Dem / ~29% GOP, but they asked the same number of Dems and
Republicans for the new poll to avoid that controversy.
Or perhaps to have a new controversy of "Why did you weight the
GOP votes down to 29% you motherfuckers?!"
\_ The "controversy" was not weighted vs. unweighted. It was
stupidity vs. facts.
\_ I just found the data for the older poll.
The weighting for that was 37% Dem / 28% GOP.
So that means they went from a split of 9% to 5% from the
old poll to the current one.
\_ There have always been more Democrats than Republicans. The
so-called controversy was just more GOP denying of reality
slapping them in the face. |
| 2006/3/14-16 [Politics/Foreign/MiddleEast/Iraq] UID:42232 Activity:nil |
3/14 Retired General William Odom, former head of the National Security
Agency and security adviser to Ronald Reagan, wrote that the Iraq war
"is serving the interests of Osama bin Laden, the Iranians, and is
fomenting civil war in Iraq." He describes the Iraq war as "the most
strategic foreign policy disaster in U.S. history."
\_ That's sort of an odd way to phrase it.
\_ Maybe he means as opposed to a tactical disaster, like the Bay
of Pigs invasion/Iranian hostage botched rescue? The whole
invasion was run from the start by crackpipe sucking neocons. |
| 2006/3/14-16 [Computer/SW/Database] UID:42233 Activity:nil |
3/14 Hello Oracle experts. Is there a reason why .getProcedures takes
so long to execute? I've tried using different jdbc connectors
from different vendors and have the same results, so I think
it must be the DB hog backend. Why does it take so long?
try{
DatabaseMetaData dbmeta = con.getMetaData();
long startTime = System.currentTimeMillis();
System.out.println("+++" + dbmeta.getClassName());
ResultSet rs = dbmeta.getProcedures(null, null, null);
long stopTime = System.currentTimeMillis();
long runTime = stopTime - startTime;
// print runTime shows 800 seconds for only 220,000 result set!
} ... ... |
| 2006/3/14-16 [Uncategorized] UID:42234 Activity:nil |
3/14 Hey, welcome back ilyas. Posting normally now eh?
\_ Hey ilyas, still think the Iraq War was a good idea?
\_ I don't think ilyas ever said it was. You probably
got ilyas confused with someone else?
\_ Huh?
\_ ilyas was posting on motd using a hidden mechanism and when it
was discovered he dissappeared for a while. Now he's back. |
| 2006/3/14-16 [Politics/Domestic/Gay, Politics/Domestic/Immigration] UID:42235 Activity:moderate |
3/14 Progressives are so much less likely to have children. Conservatism
to rule for decades to come. We're screwed. Really screwed.
http://news.yahoo.com/s/usatoday/20060314/cm_usatoday/theliberalbabybust
\_ Isn't it ironic that those who make the biggest deal of
evolution, fail its only test so pathetically? --Alanis
\_ The basic fallacy here is the idea that children always have the
values of their parents. This is demonstrably false.
\_ I'm your number one fan! That's such a great phrase! I think
you should use it at least 3 times per motd!
--Basic Fallacy Guy's #1 Fan
\_ Please demonstrate, with statistics and not with anecdotes.
please.
\_ Are social mores the same as they were 100 years ago?
\_ |R' - R| < |R' - Dnom|, where R' = f(R), but |R' - R| != 0.
\_ C'mon, all you need is one example to disprove an "always".
You still want one example?
\_ Fair enough. But you're still in trouble so long as it's
more heritable than the nominal D/R split.
\_ '50s = Prudes
'60s = Hippies
'90s = Old hippies
'00s = ?
We already have one example of Prudes producing Hippies.
You need to argue that there is an overwhelming force
which prevents Hippies from being produced from Prudes
again.
\_ Now, there are certainly anecdotal examples of '60s
hippies turning capitalist and conservative in middle
age. Again, please post statistics and not anecdotes.
\_ You want statistics on the production of Hippies
from Prudes in the '60s? You don't believe this
to have occurred without statistics?
\_ I want statistics that says political
attitude is or is not heritable. Here, I'll
make your job easier for you.
http://www.apa.org/monitor/apr04/beliefs.html
"[T]he idea that a behavioral system has a
strong genetic component is hardly an issue
anymore", or how about "the data suggest an
interplay of both genetic and environmental
factors in people's attitudes toward, for
example, sex, politics and religion,
with environment playing a stronger role".
Now, where do the genetics come from, and
who controls formative environmental factors?
\_ Sigh. If social mores didn't change over
time, we'd still be worshipping animals
and sacrificing each other to the moon
god.
\_ |R' - R| < |R' - Dnom|, where R' = f(R),
but |R' - R| != 0. And you should talk
to some wiccans and other neo-pagans.
\_ This correlation also applies to education levels, and high
\_ Again, I give you good science and you
reply with faulty logic. What did you
study in college?
\_ Anyway, this article essentially
agrees with both me and you. The
only dumb part of this thread is
your use of "Republican" and
"Democrat." I think the terms
you're looking for are "religious"
and "secular." The flaw in the
article's argument is that they don't
compare relative populations of
religious baby-producers and secular
baby-busters. I'm willing to bet
that the baby-producers are both a
smaller segment of the population, and
overwhelmingly immigrants of color.
\_ So you agree with the article that
attitudes toward politics has a
genetic component, in other words
children tend to inherit the
politics of the parents? Thanks for
playing.
\_ The article didn't say anything
about genetics, and you just
avoided everything that I said.
Thanks for playing.
\_ Wow. "[T]he data suggest an
interplay of both *genetic*
and environmental factors."
[emphasis added] Whatever
you studied in college, I
guess it was neither logic
nor reading comprehension.
The article also said
"people's attitudes toward...
politics," so your argument
that it's not about politics
is also patently wrong.
Do you have anything to say
beyond lies and obfuscation?
\_ for posterity, at least
three ppl are participatng
in this sub-thread
\_ However, we are all
commenting about the
same article, and
claims about what the
article did or did not
say can be resolved.
\_ Your question is seriously flawed, and
already probably caused a boatload of
confused discussion.
\_ What do you mean by "heritable"?
http://m-w.com:
heritable 1 : capable of being inherited or
of passing by inheritance
inheritance 1 a : the act of inheriting
property b : the reception of genetic
qualities by transmission from parent to
offspring c : the acquisition of a
possession, condition, or trait from past
generations
Obviously it is not 1(a). Are you talking
about 1(b) or 1(c)?
\_ This correlation also applies to education levels, and hig
standard of living. Cf. Europe and Japan.
\_ The article didn't really talk about this, but liberals could be
adopting all the unwanted kids that conservatives won't let hap-
less women abort. |
| 2006/3/14-16 [Politics/Foreign/MiddleEast/Iraq] UID:42236 Activity:low |
3/14 "BAGHDAD, Iraq - Iraqi authorities discovered at least 87 corpses
men shot to death execution-style as Iraq edged closer to open civil
warfare."
http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/iraq
THANK YOU Mr. George W. Bush!
\_ yawn. just another day in Iraq.
\_ Beacon of Democracy in the Middle East. And we are going to
duplicate our success in Iran!
\_ what does this have to do with global warming?
\_ My ass is getting warm.
\_ Mission Accomplished!
\_ Job well done!
\_ Major (American) combat operations are over. |
| 2006/3/14 [Recreation/Dating] UID:42237 Activity:nil 80%like:42238 |
3/14
_______________
< FEEL THE LOVE >
---------------
\ ^__^
\ (oo)\_______
(__)\ )\/\ ~
||----w | . ~ smell the love!
|| || #=.#
|| || ,.#=.. |
| 2006/3/14 [Recreation/Dating] UID:42238 Activity:nil 80%like:42237 |
_______________
< FEEL THE LOVE >
---------------
\ ^__^
\ (oo)\_______
(__)\ )\/\
||----w |
|| || |
| 5/25 |