|
2006/2/10-11 [Recreation/Dating] UID:41788 Activity:high |
2/9 Dear married men, what do you do with your porn? Do you hide them, look at them openly, or throw them away? What's the best way to deal with the issue of um, she keeps having headache or just doesn't feel like it? \_ http://tinyurl.com/bcjol \_ If those are your real life issues, your smallest concern should be your porn collection. You should be worried about your failing marriage as well as who she is screwing if it isn't you. \_ Internet, dude! Hardcopy is so... lacking. And, yes, it's okay for married men to masturbate. \_ Yep, cool by me. He should keep his cock in his hand getting off to net porn while someone else is banging his wife. Good plan! There's some sort of Darwin thing going on there. I like it. \_ Your odd assumption that she's somehow not satisfied betrays your lack of understanding of how Real Life with mature adults actually works. \_ Odd assumption? Read the OP again. "she keeps having headache or just doesn't feel like it". Maybe you think your wife really does just have lots of headaches that mysterious occur only when you're horny, but out here in Real Life Land, mature adults with headaches are banging the milkman. You have betrayed your lack of understanding of how English works. \_ You are confusing Real World with Real Life. In Real Life, having a headache or a decreased sexual appetite usually has roots in issues other than cheating. If your experience has invariably been otherwise, stop marrying unbalanced wrecks. \_ Cheating isn't the root. Cheating is the result of an unhappy sexless marriage. You're confusing cause and effect. You continue to betray your lack of understanding of the English language. \_ Physician, heal thyself. OP wonders what to do when wife says she has a headache or doesn't feel like it. He doesn't say this happens all the time. He implies that he wants advice on what to do when he's horny but his wife is not. Nothing in his post implies cheating. The correct response to his question is, have a wank and get over it. \_ I know he didn't say she's cheating. *I* said she's cheating or soon will be. The correct response is figure out what's wrong with your marriage if your marriage is such a mess you think you need *motd* help to figure out your porn/sex-with-wife issues. If he isn't taking care of her needs, someone else will. |
2006/2/10-13 [Reference/BayArea] UID:41790 Activity:nil |
2/10 history of the SF BURRITO http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/San_Francisco_Burrito - danh \_ From a linked page: Even the legendary taquerias are changing. "In '79 and '80, Anglo families were chased out of taquerias. There was no way there was gonna be any gentrification back then," says Felipe Velez, an assistant teacher at Real Alternatives Program high school. But now even the taquerias are changing. "At El Castillito, they're wearing uniforms now," Velez says. "They're charging for chips and salsa. I will shoot my son and daughter if they ever order a green burrito." OK, seriously, this reminds me of "I remember back when women weren't allowed out of the house. I'd beat my wife if she ever asked for anything" And this is a teacher! Even the legendary taquerias are changing. "In '79 and '80, Anglo families were chased out of taquerias. There was no way there was gonna be any gentrification back then," says Felipe Velez, an assistant teacher at Real Alternatives Program high school. But now even the taquerias are changing. "At El Castillito, they're wearing uniforms now," Velez says. "They're charging for chips and salsa. I will shoot my son and daughter if they ever order a green burrito." OK, seriously, this reminds me of "I remember back when women weren't allowed out of the house. I'd beat my wife if she ever asked for anything" And this is a teacher! \_ http://www.sfbg.com/37/11/x_cheap_eats.html "El Castillito charges for chips now too, 75 cents, just like El Farolito, only at least El Farolito gives you a fairly generous amount. El Castillito gave me a handful or so, wedged into the same basket as the burrito. Fuck that shit. If I'm paying separately for a burrito and chips, I want a basket for the burrito and a basket for a whole basketful of chips. Add it up: $3.48, 75c, 75c, $1.15, that's $6.13. (Same exact meal used to add up to $4.20 in the not-so-distant glory days.) Then the guy behind the cash register rolled his eyes when I handed him a twenty, asked all aggravatedly if I had anything smaller. Yeah, man. I did. I had a five." -tom |
2006/2/10-13 [Recreation/Humor, Politics/Foreign/MiddleEast/Iraq] UID:41791 Activity:nil Cat_by:auto |
2/10 Rave Party! (No clue, don't ask) http://www.glumbert.com/media/rave.html -John \_ http://www.exile.ru/2004-September-04/war_nerd.html |
2006/2/10-13 [Recreation/Humor] UID:41792 Activity:nil Cat_by:auto |
2/10 more CHUCK http://www.youtube.com/w/Chuck-Norris?v=BhiTsC1fY7s \_ Not funny. \_ After that smile on their faces when Chuck returns the handbag to the woman in red, I fully expected the next scene to be a squeaking bed given what all the other Chuck Norris Fact Sheets say. But instead! \_ Sung by Jack Bauer no less! The Bauer/Norris rivalry continues! |
2006/2/10-13 [Computer/SW/WWW/Browsers] UID:41793 Activity:moderate |
2/10 "Spyware Barely Touches Firefox" http://news.yahoo.com/s/cmp/20060210/tc_cmp/179102616 "Internet Explorer users can be as much as 21 times more likely to end up with a spyware-infected PC than people who go online with Mozilla's Firefox browser, academic researchers from Microsoft's backyard said in a recently published paper." \_ I hate made up statistics like "21x more likely to!!!!". There are many reasons for this such as the generally higher clue level of people who know enough to make an active decision to install/use an alternative browser (or have someone smart set it up for them) which means the machine is better maintained in general and the user is less likely to download and run freeporn.exe from spywarez.ru. Yes, IE is a piece of crap, but FF has it's own problems and there are many ways for shitware to get on a box. \_ yes, but. working in IT, I've never had a problem with spyware on machines running firefox as the main browser. with IE sometimes you don't have to click the misleading message to accidentally hose your system... sometimes you just need to go to the wrong site in your daily google searching. no matter what problems FF has, it doesn't change the fact that IE is a total piece of crap. \_ Absolutely true. But as I said above, the browser isn't the only way and clue level is just as important, if not more so. The loud mouthed sales moron always had porn popups but the equally clueless marketing chick didn't because she didn't run freeporn.exe every morning. User behavior. \_ it's the same users going to the same sites. It's just that with FF I haven't had to spend as much time fixing hosed computers. -pp \_ Did you actually read the article? The study was not a survey of infection rates from internet ussers out there who install or don't install browsers themselves. The IE and Fx test machines were set up by the same two professors and their two grad students. \_ A survey of infection rates would be more useful than 2 bored grad students surfing the net. At least then we could pretend it was an "all else being equal" and "we used a large enough sample size to..." argument. \_ They didn't surf the net themselves. They used web crawlers to do the surfing. (So they didn't get to enjoy the porn while doing official work.) \_ The result is pretty clear; if you go to the same set of randomly-selected sites with unpatched IE and unpatched Firefox, you're much more likely to get spyware on the IE machine. If you want to do a different study, do it. -tom \_ "with unpatch IE and unpatched Firefox". What a useless study. How about a study of what happens to unpatched Linux machines on the net? Equally useless. \_ A lot less happens to unpatched Linux machines than unpatched Windows machines; that's the point. (Typically an unpatched Windows machine will be broken into within minutes of being connected to the net, if it's not behind a firewall. -tom \_ And it will take about 10 minutes more for the Linux box. There's no point. Anyone who runs an unpatched anything will very quickly get hit with something nasty and if by some miracle they don't, they'll run freeporndialer.exe. It does not matter in the least if it takes 5 minutes or 15 minutes for your box to get owned if you're unpatched. A study that might have been useful would have been patched boxes, but I suspect when they tried that first, very little happened. I'm highly suspicious of this 'study' of unpatched boxes. \_ All MS apologists are suspicious of studies which show that Windows is a security risk. Anyone who actually has to manage different platforms already knows it. -tom \_ Yep, when you're against the wall and have nothing left to support your argument, resort to personal attack and smear. Good call. \_ You have provided absolutely nothing to support your argument. -tom \_ The sky is still blue, academic tests of unpatched boxes is still stupid and you resort to personal attack when cornered. I'm glad the world remains predictable. BTW, how does it feel to always be right? I always wondered what it was like to be perfect. Please tell us. \_ sounds like you're the one resorting to personal attack. -tom \_ Tell us about perfection and always being right, tom. \_ Step back, man. AFAICT, tom has been pretty technical and succinct in expressing his opinions. Perhaps you should reread the thread again, man. reread the thread again. Could you elucidate to a clueless like me what exactly it was that was said that that upset you so much? -mice it was that was said which upset you so much? -mice was said which upset you so much? -mice opinions. Could you elucidate to a clueless like me what was said which upset you so much? -mice |
2006/2/10-13 [Recreation/House] UID:41794 Activity:kinda low Cat_by:auto |
2/10 Has anyone bought tatami's to use in the living room or tea room? How heavy are they and what are you thought? Thanks. \_ one tatami two tatami three tatami floor \_ Yeah--they're not tremdously heavy (straw with rice filling if made the "real" way); an average person should be able to lift 3-4 at a time without too much trouble (weight-wise; they're a bit clumsily sized.) Make sure you plan it out well, as authentic tatamis only come in 2 sizes (full or half) and they vary a lot in quality and price. Best ask someone more familiar with Japanese furniture for what to look for. -John \_ my girlfriend sleeps in a tatami room. I can ask her when she comes home sunday. \_ Is she a HAWT AZN CHIX0R? \_ My girlfriend has been sleeping like a big pig since returning. I will ask her once she awakens from her jet lag induced stupor. time zone switching induced stupor. \_ you can get real tatami's at http://www.dukaru.com , we actually use them for sleeping, though. they were actually heavier than I thought they would be, and are made with high quality. \_ do they fit on a standard futon? \_ you do know that all sort of parasites eventually live off tatami, right? |
2006/2/10-13 [Computer/HW/CPU] UID:41795 Activity:moderate |
2/10 What was your computer configuration during your UCB years? \_ None. \_ 286, 5.25" disk drives \_ 486-66, upgraded to 100MHz. Worked far better than the HPUX machines compiling over NFS at the time (graduated in '97). \_ hah, me too, except I also did the DX3 (33 MHz FSB) to DX2 (50 MHz FSB) hack that was all the rage back then. \_ 386SX-16, then a 486-66. i think i had a P133 by the end, or shortly after UCB. \_ 386SX-16, 4MB RAM, 185MB HD, 5.25" and 3.5" floppies, 2400baud modem, HCG monitor, serial mouse, Epson LX-810. Worked great. Ironically, I had a composite color monotor for my Apple II+ in my high school days, so I "downgraded" my monitor when switching to PC. --- Class of '93 \_ typewriter the first semester (mostly for English 1A), then 286, then 386DX \_ Mac SE, PowerBook 180 ('93); Quadra 650 ('95), Pentium 150 running RH3 ('97) --class of '97 \_ Mac SE -> Mac Classic II -> Mac IIcx -> Pentium II -- Class of '98 \_ why did you finally convert to the WINTEL world? \_ I went to go buy a Powermac, and decided I was willing to spend about $2500 bucks. I wanted to run UN*X, and figured spend about $2500. I wanted to run UN*X, and figured I'd be stuck running Yellowdog Linux or something. Most of my friends ran FreeBSD, so I figured I'd at least _look_ at what I could get for $2500 in a PC. It turned out to be like 4x the machine. \_ P133 that I played Quake on, then a Celeron 300A @450 that I played Half-Life on. School? yeah I think I went to some sort of classes sometimes, kind of hazy. \_ Commodore 128, later replaced by an Amiga3000UX. -ERic \_ I was too poor for my own computer, so I just hung out in The Web. \_ In my days even people who had computers had to hang out in the Web, because there was no such thing as a PPP dialup or free X server for Windoze. Actually, even if these two existed, performance would be terrible over a 2400baud connection anyway. --- Class of '93 \_ I worked 'near' the guy who was responsible for the EECS modem bank around then and pushed hard to get everything upgraded to 9600 to no avail. He only ended up destroying half the modem bank and oh nevermind... it hurts to think about it. \_ 486-33. Too wimpy to even play Doom when it came out. \_ That was perfectly sufficient for playing doom. \_ With a math co-processor, yes. Without, no. -!op \_ http://www.faqs.org/faqs/games/doom/RGCD-faq "Does DOOM benefit from a FPU for floating point calculations? No. All calculations in DOOM 1.1 and beyond use integers." ... so did doom 1.0 use fp? \_ Presumably. Either that or something like a 16.16 integer representation of real numbers. \_ First 2 years, a TI portable with 12.5MHz 286 CPU, 640KB of RAM, 40MB hard drive and a monorchrone screen. The following 1 year 233MHz Pentium MMX PC with 32MB of RAM, 2GB disk (made by Micron). The remaining two years (after a long perdiod out of school), 933MHz Dell with 512MB of RAM. \_ ADM-3A terminal plugged into a modem for dialup access. \_ TVI 925 dialup terminal with 1200 baud, later upgraded to 14.4! |
2006/2/10-13 [Uncategorized] UID:41796 Activity:nil |
2/10 Tom, what do you think about DKDY? \_ I don't invest in junk. -tom \_ What do you know about DKDY? \_ Tom, what do you know about DKDY? \_ tom, would you invest in Altria? \_ Not directly, not. I can't claim purity, as I do own \_ Not directly, no. I can't claim purity, as I do own Berkshire Hathaway, which I believe still has significant MO holdings. -tom \_ Consider switching from Berkshire to LUK (the little berkshire). compare the charts since 1990. berkshire, at 135B, is a little too big to find many good picks, even with the old man's investment style. luk, in contrast, is only 6B. |
2006/2/10-13 [Politics/Domestic, Politics/Domestic/President] UID:41797 Activity:nil |
2/10 "Gov't Budget Surplus Hits $21B for Jan." http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20060210/ap_on_go_ot/budget_blank_ink I'm very confused. Haven't we be having budget deficits all these years? \_ That's the balance for the month of January only. See http://www.fms.treas.gov/mts/index.html for receipts and outlays for the last 25 years. \_ Right. Though this report is a good January, the monthly surpluse/deficit fluctuates. If you look at the monthly results, the receipts spike every few months and really go up each April. Another place for information is: http://www.cbo.gov -emarkp \_ don't worry, we'll spend it all by the end of the year \_ sweet. can I choose which parts of the budget I want to support and get a refund on the rest? \_ run for a house seat and you even get free plane trips to resorts, etc. don't get caught with an intern, though. |
2006/2/10-13 [Uncategorized] UID:41798 Activity:nil |
2/10 ecchang \_ is the ChiCom and Big Cow Wang troller |
2006/2/10-13 [Uncategorized] UID:41799 Activity:nil |
2/10 David Hasslehoff at his most... err... http://www.bigcheesepress.com/joanis/david_hasslehoff1.jpg \_ but then he bites a salmon... http://www.ifilm.com/ifilmdetail/2433520?htv=12 |
2006/2/10-13 [Recreation/Dating] UID:41800 Activity:nil |
2/10 http://www.somethingawful.com/articles.php?a=3574 When you care enough to send a Star Wars Valentine's Day card. |
2006/2/10-13 [Computer/SW/WWW/Browsers] UID:41801 Activity:nil |
2/10 Holy crap! I'm using Opera 9 TP 2. I hovered over one of my tabs, and a mini-preview of the page for that tap popped up. Neato! \_ As far as I could tell Opera doesn't support FF style extensions or anything similar. I'm addicted to extensions now. Nothing else matters. \_ http://userjs.org \_ Opera UserJS == Firefox Greasemonkey, AFAICT. That's just one extension. You can do _way_ more with Extensions than what you can do with just UserJS. \_ For example, see http://codecamp.de/pwdhashforopera \_ http://ted.mielczarek.org/code/mozilla/tabpreview |
3/15 |