1/7 I was looking at Mine Safety and Health Administration statisics,
and it seems reality is exactly the opposite of media portrayal from
the last week.
http://www.msha.gov/MSHAINFO/FactSheets/MSHAFCT10.HTM table titled
"Coal Mine Safety and Health". The fatal injury rate for miners has
dropped from 2000 to 2004, from 0.0393 to 0.0273. All injury rate
has dropped also, from 6.64 in 2000 to 5.00 in 2004. It is true that
the percentage of citations and orders has dropped from 42% to 41%
(from 2000 to 2004, and dipping to 38% in 2002). However, the number
of coal mines has dropped from 2000 to 2004, from 2124 mines to 2008.
While the number of mines has decreased, the number of miners has
slightly increased from 108.1K to 108.5K. This is explained by the
number of smaller mines that have closed (the number of small mines
dropped from 571 in 2000 to 560 in 2004). On-site inspection hours
per mine has increased from 215.7 in 2000 to 219.2 in 2004.
The lower citation rate may well be because larger mines are
somewhat better run and therefore slightly less prone to citations.
\_ I was the only one who reported that some Clinton-era official
said that mine citations were "way down", and cited the LA Times.
My bad -- I can't seem to find anything at all like this now on
that site or others. I will be more careful next time.
Anyway, apart from my mistake, the media is reporting that
citation penalty amounts are down along with criminal convictions.
http://www.sltrib.com/ci_3379597?source=rss
-jctwu
\_ According the the MSHA, penalty assessed (in $million) was
18.4 in 1995, 12.0 in 2000, and 17.0 in 2004. Bear in mind
though that there were 2946 coal mines in 1995 and only 2008
in 2004. The amount penalty per mine actually went from
$6.2K in 1995 to $8.5K in 2004. The number of citations
per mine also went from 27.9 in 1995 to 32.2 in 2004. (I know
citations != convictions, but unfortunately the MSHA site
does not list convictions.) It's deceptive to look at raw
numbers, which did decrease from 1995 to 2004, because the
number of mines dropped from 2946 to 2008 in the same period.
The claims in the article you quoted are also deceptive in the
same way, since the number of mines also decreased from 2001
to 2004 (and the decrease in number of major fines is roughly
similar to the decrease in the number of mines). The other
charges are somewhat difficult to answer since the article
does not provide enough information (re penalty payment
rate, for example, the article does not say what the non-Bush
payment rate is). As usual, I find the reporting to be sadly
lacking and outright deceptive in this case.
\_ http://www.pnionline.com/dnblog/attytood/archives/002620.html
\_ Accusations are cheap; show me some numbes. From the MSHA, it
looks like injury rate is down, fines are up, citations are up,
and on-site inspection hours are up. No one is arguing
Sago is a well-run mine. It is disheartening how low their fines
have been. But is that a recent thing, or have fines always been
low? According to the MSHA, the $ fine per mine has gone up
since 1995 (from $6.2K to $8.5K in 2004). What metric are you
using to show that the industry is deteriorating or the regulatory
body is doing a worse job? I've listed mine and its source.
Now please show us yours. And hard numbers please; we're
engineers here.
\_ Nah, I don't have time to do the kind of research it would
require to prove this one way or another. One thing though,
did you pull out strip mines from your numbers? Strip
mines are much safer than shaft mines and most of the
newer mines are all strip mines. |