| ||||||
| 2006/1/1-4 [Uncategorized] UID:41186 Activity:low |
1/1 What do you guys think about McMansions? Great? Bad? No opinion?
\_ McMansions are usually bought by [single] working people who can
barely afford them using interest only loans. Statistics show
that most of the McMansions are quite empty because their owners
are too busy with work and have no time to decorate them, let
alone enjoy them. Since McMansions are usually built far away
from metropolitan areas, their owners also tend to drive huge
SUVs so that they can load up stuff they need, minimizing the
time and frequency in which they must travel between their
McMansions and civilization (eg. Costco). Young McMansion owners
are usually shocked at the $500-$1000 utility costs since
McMansions are usually located in traditionally undesirable
areas that are over 50-100 miles from big coastal cities, thus
have huge temperature swings. McMansion owners love their homes
because their homes allow them to feel like millionaires without
actually having to be one.
\_ I think they are fine if you have a big family, an ostentatious
display of wealth otherwise.
\_ Why do you think "McMansions" are an ostentatious display of
wealth and regular (larger and more expensive) mansions are not?
\_ I don't see how the pp implies this. The question was about
McMansions, not mansions in general. Anyway, I think it's a
given that mansions are ostentatious. -!pp
\_ Why would you care what we think? Is this the Great Question of
Our Time? |
| 2006/1/1-4 [Recreation/Dating] UID:41187 Activity:nil |
1/1 It's 2006! May all your sodans get laid!
\_ Done, done, and done again! Gotta go, SO is calling me back for
more. - alumnus |
| 2006/1/1 [Politics/Domestic/911] UID:41188 Activity:nil 88%like:41191 |
12/1 Wild predictions for 2006
http://news.yahoo.com/s/usatoday/20051230/cm_usatoday/will06bringmoregoodnewsthanbad |
| 2006/1/1-4 [Reference/RealEstate, Recreation/House] UID:41189 Activity:nil |
12/1 I just bought a 2-year old condo unit. What's the best way to clean,
seal, and polish flat marbles to semi-glossy in the kitchen and
bathroom (which by the way has a little bit of pee stains)?
Also the granite in the shower-room could use a bit
of work too. I went to Home Depot but it's a bit confusing
given that they have hundreds of solutions to use. Any
advice would be greatly appreciated. Thanks and Happy New Year!
\_ ObHousingBubbleTalk |
| 2006/1/1-4 [Uncategorized] UID:41190 Activity:nil |
1/1 Any reason that spamd isn't running? |
| 2006/1/1-4 [Politics/Domestic/California, Politics/Domestic/911] UID:41191 Activity:nil 88%like:41188 |
1/1 Wild predictions for 2006
http://tinyurl.com/ckllp (news.yahoo.com)
\_ From USAToday founder, actually: http://tinyurl.com/7uooe |
| 2006/1/1-4 [Computer/SW/Mail, Computer/SW/SpamAssassin] UID:41192 Activity:nil |
1/1 Anyone ever have problems with procmail inserting a '>' in front of
the 'From' field when it forwards email? I haven't been able to
figure out how to prevent this, not find any web info talking about
it. The insertion screws up mail-reading at the forwarded end
(thunderbird does not separate out the subject and other fields any
more). Thanks!
\_ It's probably sendmail, not procmail doing that. And the problem
is probably that you're attaching the original headers in the
message body, instead of in the message header, or another From
header is being added, so sendmail is escaping the From.
\_ Yeah, looking at an email as received at csua and at the
remote forward destination, it looks like in the process of
procmail forwarding it wraps a new set of headers on top of
the email. I thought that it used to work fine without
changing things like this, though? Haven't been able to
find any documentation that shines any light on modifying the
behavior to forward the mail with original headers, though -op |