|
2006/1/1-4 [Uncategorized] UID:41186 Activity:low |
1/1 What do you guys think about McMansions? Great? Bad? No opinion? \_ McMansions are usually bought by [single] working people who can barely afford them using interest only loans. Statistics show that most of the McMansions are quite empty because their owners are too busy with work and have no time to decorate them, let alone enjoy them. Since McMansions are usually built far away from metropolitan areas, their owners also tend to drive huge SUVs so that they can load up stuff they need, minimizing the time and frequency in which they must travel between their McMansions and civilization (eg. Costco). Young McMansion owners are usually shocked at the $500-$1000 utility costs since McMansions are usually located in traditionally undesirable areas that are over 50-100 miles from big coastal cities, thus have huge temperature swings. McMansion owners love their homes because their homes allow them to feel like millionaires without actually having to be one. \_ I think they are fine if you have a big family, an ostentatious display of wealth otherwise. \_ Why do you think "McMansions" are an ostentatious display of wealth and regular (larger and more expensive) mansions are not? \_ I don't see how the pp implies this. The question was about McMansions, not mansions in general. Anyway, I think it's a given that mansions are ostentatious. -!pp \_ Why would you care what we think? Is this the Great Question of Our Time? |
2006/1/1-4 [Recreation/Dating] UID:41187 Activity:nil |
1/1 It's 2006! May all your sodans get laid! \_ Done, done, and done again! Gotta go, SO is calling me back for more. - alumnus |
2006/1/1 [Politics/Domestic/911] UID:41188 Activity:nil 88%like:41191 |
12/1 Wild predictions for 2006 http://news.yahoo.com/s/usatoday/20051230/cm_usatoday/will06bringmoregoodnewsthanbad |
2006/1/1-4 [Reference/RealEstate, Recreation/House] UID:41189 Activity:nil |
12/1 I just bought a 2-year old condo unit. What's the best way to clean, seal, and polish flat marbles to semi-glossy in the kitchen and bathroom (which by the way has a little bit of pee stains)? Also the granite in the shower-room could use a bit of work too. I went to Home Depot but it's a bit confusing given that they have hundreds of solutions to use. Any advice would be greatly appreciated. Thanks and Happy New Year! \_ ObHousingBubbleTalk |
2006/1/1-4 [Uncategorized] UID:41190 Activity:nil |
1/1 Any reason that spamd isn't running? |
2006/1/1-4 [Politics/Domestic/California, Politics/Domestic/911] UID:41191 Activity:nil 88%like:41188 |
1/1 Wild predictions for 2006 http://tinyurl.com/ckllp (news.yahoo.com) \_ From USAToday founder, actually: http://tinyurl.com/7uooe |
2006/1/1-4 [Computer/SW/Mail, Computer/SW/SpamAssassin] UID:41192 Activity:nil |
1/1 Anyone ever have problems with procmail inserting a '>' in front of the 'From' field when it forwards email? I haven't been able to figure out how to prevent this, not find any web info talking about it. The insertion screws up mail-reading at the forwarded end (thunderbird does not separate out the subject and other fields any more). Thanks! \_ It's probably sendmail, not procmail doing that. And the problem is probably that you're attaching the original headers in the message body, instead of in the message header, or another From header is being added, so sendmail is escaping the From. \_ Yeah, looking at an email as received at csua and at the remote forward destination, it looks like in the process of procmail forwarding it wraps a new set of headers on top of the email. I thought that it used to work fine without changing things like this, though? Haven't been able to find any documentation that shines any light on modifying the behavior to forward the mail with original headers, though -op |