|
2005/4/9-10 [Politics/Domestic] UID:37125 Activity:high |
4/8 I love Conservative logic: "The less virtue we have in our society, the more the need for government to control our lives, to govern our lives." -Santorum In other words, government needs to enforce virtue in order to keep government out of our lives. \_ Sounds like some hippie needs their virtues l'arned again! \_ What's wrong with the above statement? It's just another way of saying, the more enlightened a society, the more each individuals regulate themselves, and the less you'll need a government. \_ Because there's an implicit "^virtue^of my particular values" that I, at least, read in that statement. -sax |
2005/4/9-10 [Academia, Academia/GradSchool] UID:37126 Activity:low |
4/8 Whao, what happened here? Did we even enter? http://icpc.baylor.edu/icpc/Finals/Standings.html \_ Uh, let's just say '04 was not a good year for us. \_ The US restrictions on foreign students are, predictably, improving the student pools at universities in other countries. How long will it be before the US's cultural and business dominance of the world are just a historical footnote? -tom \_ US restrictions on foreign students have almost zero effect on any undergraduate population in the US. I share your concern about grad populations, but the ICPC is mostly undergrad. |
2005/4/9-10 [Computer/SW/OS/Windows, Computer/SW/Apps] UID:37127 Activity:nil |
4/8 Just out of curiousity, has anyone tried eBooks (Adobe reader, Microsoft reader)? What is it like? eBooks are a lot cheaper than regular books and they don't take up any space and allow you to do quick searches. However, I'm wondering if they're transferable between computers. Any comment on this? -ok thx \_ They're transferable between computers if you remove the DRM. Remember Dmitry Skylarov? |
2005/4/9 [Politics/Domestic/California] UID:37128 Activity:nil |
4/8 California campers attacked and robbed by Mexican Nationals (Illegal Aliens) http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1380571/posts |
2005/4/9-10 [Politics/Foreign, Politics/Foreign/Europe, Finance/Investment] UID:37129 Activity:nil |
4/8 Free Trade killed the Neanderthals: http://www.newscientist.com/article.ns?id=dn7221 |
2005/4/9-10 [Computer/HW/Laptop, Computer/SW/Virus] UID:37130 Activity:high |
4/8 To save power I set my laptop to shut down HD after 1 min of inactivity. However, my laptop always does something to the HD and I know this because it keeps clicking and clicking. I've turned off Norton Realtime Anti-Virus thing, Firefox/IE, MS Word, and pretty much everything I can think of, but it just never turns off. What could be causing this? BTW I have 1.5G of RAM and XP and apps only about 0.5G. \_ Modern OSes will premtively copy memory to/from the swap file if the system is fairly idle. That way if you do need to swap out those pages you don't have to wait for the data to be written. \_ Well, you could be running applications that save or backup their state or config files or whatever every x minutes, and the swap file is a possibility too. If you have that much RAM, you probably don't need one. I have 1 GB and I don't even need one. \_ XP will defrag/index files when idle by default. \_ What? Is this for real? That is just brain dead. How do you turn this off? \_ right-click the disk, General tab, uncheck "Allow indexing service to index this disk for fast file searching" \_ This shouldn't be necessary, unless you enabled the indexing service -- it doesn't run by default. \_ I concur. For XP, the drive option is on by default, but the service is off by default. This is unlike 2K, where the service is on by default. Also, defrag != indexing. Duh. \_ HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SOFTWARE\Microsoft\Dfrg\BootOptimizeFunction set "Enable" to N and reboot. -ray |
2005/4/9-12 [Recreation/Media] UID:37131 Activity:moderate |
4/9 "The Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy movie is bad. Really bad. You just won't believe how vastly, staggeringly, jaw-droppingly bad it is." http://www.planetmagrathea.com/shortreview.html Sorta spoiler-ish, but not as spoilerish as the long review available within the page above, a list of things NOT in the movie: http://www.planetmagrathea.com/notinthefilm.html No guide entry on towels?! \_ I did not read the longer spoiler-full review, but from what I did read I don't trust this guy. So what if the story has been drastically changed? If you want to just see an on-screen version of the radio show, the BBC has already done that. I'm not going to predict whether the movie will suck, but I'm not going to listen to the rantings of the kind of angry nerd who ends up on slashdot. \_ Better yet, the BBC's TV version is radically different from the Radio Version, and the book version deviates even farther from there. Douglas himself was an inveterate last-minute editor. \_ Comparing the original book to the movie adaptation is the classic nerd exercise in mental masturbation. Movies are simply a different medium, get over it. Some things that work in books just don't translate well to movies. Also, not everything in the book can be included in the movie due to time constraints. \_ Douglas Adams wrote very cinematically because he worked in the medium. His books are filled with dialogue and scene description. Yes, time constraints are an issue, but if they did indeed simply cut out the punchlines, that would be just stupid. \_ Didn't read the review, did you? He address all above points. His main point is that they've taken out the jokes and replaced them with lame ones. \_ As someone who did read the review, I agree with the pp. \_ His point is still valid. The _story_ of the book is not it's strength - it has virtually no story. If you take out the jokes, there's no point. \_ Took out the jokes that *he* liked. I'd have to see it before I assumed that it was totally devoid of humor. \_ Yeah, I heard they changed the meaning of life to 137. Now that's just stupid. Totally ruins the joke. \_ But that's approximately one over the fine structure constant! \_ This is funny 'cause if they really did that it wouldn't change the joke at all, and yet, I'd be REALLY annoyed, despite being completely ok with them changing random stuff around. |
2005/4/9-13 [Computer/HW/Laptop] UID:37132 Activity:low |
4/9 I received a letter from Cal saying my name was stored on that stolen laptop. Should I really place a "credit alert"? And would doing so hurt my credit rating? \_ it can't hurt to place a credit alert. and I don't see how/why it would affect your credit rating. \_ Yes. File the report. Not filing if the threat proves real could devastate your credit for decades. Filing when you don't need to will hardly matter. \_ Should I file the 90 day initial alert or the extended alert, which requires a police report? Should I refile the 90 day alert every 90 days for the rest of my life? This is a serious question. If it makes sense to file an alert now, and one can never predict when the stolen information will (no longer) be used, it seems to make equal sense to keep the alert on forever. BTW it seems that an alert will show up on the credit report. \_ Depends how vulnerable you feel. 90 day alert is simple to place so you might as well do that asap. Policy report may or may not be a hassle to get. \_ Jeesh, it is a bunch of cal students isn't it? Someone should get the police report and put it up on the web. |