|
2005/3/13-15 [Politics/Foreign/MiddleEast/Iraq] UID:36667 Activity:nil |
3/13 Iraq will likely not be an Islamic state: http://abcnews.go.com/International/print?id=575516 (relevant bit is about 1/2 way down the page) \_ The Iraqis will tell us anything at this point, if they think it will make us go away faster. |
2005/3/13-15 [Uncategorized] UID:36668 Activity:nil |
3/13 MMC Gunner's Palace - watch, wait for dvd, or skip? |
2005/3/13-15 [Uncategorized] UID:36669 Activity:kinda low |
3/13 So how expensive is your daily nicotine habit? \_ Nicotine free: .... \_ $0: ......... \_ 25 cents: . \_ That's not bad. \_ 2nd hand smoke is free |
2005/3/13-15 [Finance/CC] UID:36670 Activity:kinda low |
3/13 What's the deal with this academic conference spam? Are any of these real conferences, or are they scams to get email addresses and credit card numbers? I get quite a few of these, and they don't seem to care that none of the conferences are even close to my field. \_ The one someone forwarded to me came from an ISP account and was relayed through China. Looks like a new virus or some such. -tom \_ Many academics, me included, get a phenomenal number from the "World Multi-Conference on Systemics, Cybernetics, and Informatics". These clowns extend the deadlines repeatedly and generally send me something about once a month, which is why I'm such a fan of the terrific paper by David Mazieres and Eddie Kohler that they submitted to the conference: http://www.scs.cs.nyu.edu/~dm/remove.pdf \_ That's funny and clever and I appreciate the sentiment, but it doesn't really answer the question. Does the WMCSCI conference really exist? If not, is it just an email harvester or are they stealing credit card numbers also? \_ I think it's "legit" in that it's not a scam, but it's just a really really crappy conference, and the only people there will be the authors. (Lots of Euro conferences are like this - it's a joint venture between the conference organizers and the hotel, just to fill the hotel, and they usually invite a big name [Nobel] to speak and pay him with your conference fees. But the only attendees at the conference are the authors.) \_ Ok, thanks. That's idiotic, but I guess I can't call the FBI over it. \_ This sounds worse than a scam to me. \_ Why do authors bother to attend then? \_ Some academics are more desperate than others to publish somewhere, anywhere. Also if you have funding to travel to present, a European location ain't bad. |
2005/3/13-15 [Computer/Networking] UID:36671 Activity:nil |
3/13 Can anybody suggest a proxy server that runs on windows? I'm not experienced with setting up proxies but would like to set up one using encryption. Would I have to seperately set up a VPN and then run the proxy over that connection? \_ Just out of curiosity, what's the situation? What are you planning to proxy? \_ Primarily 'questionable' http and bittorrent traffic. \_ Try squid: http://www.acmeconsulting.it/pagine/opensource/squid/squidnt25.htm \_ Probably should have been more specific. I think I want some sort of encrypted SOCKS proxy. -op \_ Perhaps openssh's -D option? |
2005/3/13 [Uncategorized] UID:36672 Activity:nil |
3/13 iptables v.s. pf Which is better? |
2005/3/13-15 [Computer/SW/OS/OsX] UID:36673 Activity:kinda low |
3/13 I'm trying to get a Mac with an Airport on the net via my lynksys AP. My W2k laptop works fine but I can't get the Mac to talk to it. I'm using 128bit WEP but turning it off didn't help. Is the Mac able to talk to non-apple APs? \_ Yes \_ I had this problem but the other way around. It was an issue with the way SSIDs/keys were entered (I forget the specifics, but it was a question of leading 0x and hex/non-hex strings.) Try something along those lines if nothing else works. -John \_ I had to put a "$" in front of the WEP password when entering it into the Mac. Didn't have to change anything on the linksys. Works fine after that. \_ John and anon person, thank you. I'll give those both a try. Where did the idea of prefixing a "$" come from? Thanks! --op \_ I googled it a year ago when I had the same problem as you did. John's explanation is vaguely familiar; it definitely had something to do with hex vs. plain text, and the $ makes it a literal WEP key ... or something. |
2005/3/13-15 [Computer/HW/Drives] UID:36674 Activity:moderate |
3/13 HDD question: ran badblocks (hda1) once: found 1 badblock. ran it again (hda), found 0 badblocks. The HDD is still in warranty. If it were yours, would you replace it? \_ To all potential repliers: Please note the question is primarily about "how accurate is badblocks if it reports 1 badblock on one run and 0 on the second". For the obvious example of Windows stalling on just one sector or reporting any bad sectors at all, I would schedule that disk to be replaced as soon as possible. \_ is badblocks a linux tool? I would find a SMART tool such as smartctl on linux and check the disk status. if it has run low of block-remapping entries, replace it yesterday. \_ Thanks. Yes, I used badblocks (-w) on the KNOPPIX CD. I just ran smartctl in KNOPPIX, and it doesn't appear to have any block-remapping entries that I can find. I ran: smartctl -a /dev/hda and noticed that it says "Warning! SMART Selective Self-Test Log Structure error: invalid SMART checksum. SMART Selective self-test log data structire revision number 1." How serious is this error. BTW, I've ordered a replacement disk from dell. Hope it was the right thing todo. \_ sorry it is called Reallocated_Sector_Ct in the output from -a. I think it is in percent and starts at 100 for a new, healthy disk. i'm not familiar with log checksum errors. \_ It looks like that starts at 0 and goes to 100. The WORST and VALUE columns are 100. This RAW_VALUE is 0. That test looks okay. This SMART stuff is pretty nifty. \_ hmm, on mine it starts at 100 and goes to zero when all reallocation entries are in use. if yours is 100, I have no idea why you have block errors. cable/controller problems? the disk should self-correct until it runs out of map entries. |