|
2005/2/2-3 [Computer/HW/Drives] UID:36025 Activity:nil |
2/1 <nevermind, i found: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/dishrip \_ If you do this, the easiest way I've found is to open the box, yank the IDE and power cables from the motherboard side (leave the HD in the cage), and plug them into an external drive enclosure. You'll need to make a molex gender changer (unless you can find one somewhere) -- remember to match colors. |
2005/2/2 [Recreation/Dating] UID:36026 Activity:high |
2/1 Would it be appropriate and/or necessary to give a modest gift and a greeting card on the St. Valentines day to someone with whom I have been on a date only once before? \_ How old is the girl? All of my sister's dumb college friends love that shit on Valentine's Day, even if it is just after a first date, especially if the guy is "hot". I guess a better question is how vapid is the girl? \_ Where do you want the relationship to go? If you plan to pursue it, then it would be wise to do so. That said, I'd avoid greeting cards for something sensitive like this. When I say greeting card I mean card from Hallmark or similar monolithic card manufacturer with prefab pseudo-heartfelt message already written for you. Cards with blank interior are better. \_ Kind of depends. Unless you really got the feeling she/he was totally into you on the first date, I'd agree with PP, and also avoid Valentine's day altogether (why not just a nice blank card with a note something like "I enjoyed the date, I'd like to see you again"?) -John \_ I would have to say, no. And I think being predictable and doing something special only on special days, is not all that special \_ What they all said, but with this addendum. Consider going to a place that says sells interesting non-Hallmark cards. If you see something that stands out, buy it, inscribe it with just your name and that you thought of her or some such, and give it to her for the next date - whether that is Valentine's Day or not. Every woman I've known has appreciated interesting cards picked out for them. -- ulysses \_ As a guy, I like to receive cards, read them, and then throw them away. Yes, Seinfeld addressed this. Women seem to be horrified when they find out. WTF do they keep these cards?! \_ I keep every card sent to me but I'm a packrat. \_ How bout just a simple, single flower? \_ I suggest a limp yellow rose! \_ Danger, danger Will Robinson. As the NP suggests, a dozen roses is too strong. The problem is that with a single flower you risk looking cheap (and thus, insincere). If you're going to give a single flower, take care to present in a way that shows you put some time, thought and effort into it. \_ If you've only had one date, obviously you shouldn't go overboard. Some PPs seem to be suggesting you just send a card. While *some* women would prefer you don't make a big deal out of Valentine's Day, they probably wouldn't be put off by a heartfelt gesture. On the other hand, I'm guessing the other 95% of women DO want to see you put in some sort of effort. She may say she doesn't want anything and be secretly dissapointed when you do nothing. So play it safe and do something to show you care. This early in the relationship, a dozen roses would be coming on too strong, but a sincere card you wrote and a single red rose would be excellent. |
2005/2/2 [Uncategorized] UID:36027 Activity:nil |
2/1 Who is the best dressed sodan? \_ Individual instance, or weighted daily average? \_ John, but he is European. -ausman \_ Thanks :) But Jim, I thought you knew me at Cal... -John |
2005/2/2-3 [Computer/SW/OS/OsX] UID:36028 Activity:nil |
2/1 My special PS/2 keyboard is connected to PS2-to-USB conv which is then connected to a Mac. It is quite sluggish and I'm guessing it is due to the the USB to kbd driver. What can I do to speed it up? Can I change the priority of the driver or process, and what is it? -Macless \_ I've never found a PS/2 to USB adapter for a Mac that works reliably over time. Tried a billion. YMMV. \_ I've had good luck with Raritan converters. \_ Did you try Raritan? |
2005/2/2 [Computer/Companies/Ebay] UID:36029 Activity:moderate |
2/2 I received an email ostensibly from http://paypal.com, saying that my account has been flagged and asked me to verify my info at 210.221.194.* I find it very suspicious and I am not sure if I really had a paypal register under that email addr? Is this real or just phishing? How could I tell in general? \_ It's a scam. I've had this happen to me for various banks to which I do not hold an account to. For example, if it was CitiBank they would ask you to go to a site called <DEAD>citibanksecurity.com<DEAD> or something like that where they would ask you to enter your username, password, and bank account number. But if you try to resolve citibanksecurity, or whatever fictitious name they use, it would resolve to something else. \_ Seconded that it's a scam. If you want to assure yourself, look at the HTML source of the email. Look at the actual link target. If it goes to a dotted-decimal IP, HTML-secape-code address, <DEAD>paypal.com.something-else.com<DEAD>, <DEAD>paypal-something-else.com<DEAD>, or http://paypal.com@something-else.com you know it's bogus. If you have to assuage your fears that it might be legit, delete the email and manually type in http://www.paypal.com and log in to your account like normal. If they actually have a message for you you should see it then. But it's definitely a scam. \_ Scam. Paypal promises that they will never send you an email with a link in it. No other financial institution should do this either. \_ Another useful tip specific to paypal is that the real paypal mail will always address you by your name, and never as "Dear Paypal User." |
2005/2/2-3 [Computer/HW, Computer/HW/Drives] UID:36030 Activity:low |
2/2 What are the differences and pros/cons of POP3 vs. IMAP? I'm asking both on the admin side and for the end-user. \_ Hm the nuker strikes again. IMAP is good because it lets you see mails from several clients (including via CLI and web mail.) If you're going to do imap, I recommend Dovecot/imaps + Postfix with TLS and SMTP AUTH. I also run an openwebmail server over SSL, the whole combo works a charm. -John \_ The most irritating aspect of POP3 is when you are migrating someone to another computer, and their new workstation downloads 5,000 duplicate e-mails that weren't deleted from the mail server yet -- and each duplicate e-mail is re-filtered into separate folders in their e-mail client. \_ IMAP uses more disk space on the server, and pop is a pain for the end-user-side if they have more than one computer. POP is good if the user has one computer. overall IMAP is nice. \_ How much more? One file per message vs. one file per user, or multiple copies of each message? Are we talking 5% or 200%? \_ The number of messages per file varies depending on the implementation, but with IMAP, mail stays on the server, so that is a whole lot more disk space if you user keeps a lot of mail, and the storage grows over time. I don't think any sane email system would keep "multiple copies of each message". http://www.google.com/search?q=pop+versus+imap \_ Disk size doubles every 12 (or is it 18 month). Not using IMAP because (shock and horror) users will store mail on the server (kind of the point, now isn't it) is a) insane and b) means you need don't understand exponentials and should probably get out of this computery business... \_ IMAP is great if you have mail clients that do reasonable caching of messages after downloading them. It also allows you to run a concurrent webmail service without problems. I recommend trying dovecot imaps. -John \_ The really sad thing is that IMAP as a protocol is a superset of POP3. You can make IMAP act just like POP3 if you want. In practice, people seem to write IMAP clients to tend to leave mail on the server and POP3 to tend to download it all every time. \_ POP3 is fucking deprecated. Don't use it anymore. The main (only?) benefit of POP3 is that it allows lazy fucking admins to do less set up and (short term) maintenance. The main problem with IMAP is that because lazy fucking admins kept using POP3 the immature, poor IMAP servers and clients haven't died the painful death at the hands of the market they deserve. If you're going to run an open-source IMAP server, run Cyrus. Courier and UW-IMAP both suck hard if you throw a large number of users or a handful of users with large mailboxes at them. If you want a good tool to extract messages from the clutches of your existing mailserver and transfer them via imap commands to your shiny new mailserver, dig up the uw-mailutils utility(ies?) which are part of the UW-IMAP package or available alone in debian (apt-get install uw-mailutils). |
2005/2/2 [Politics/Foreign/MiddleEast/Iraq] UID:36031 Activity:high |
2/2 The top entry on Iraq the Model tells some interesting stories from the elections http://iraqthemodel.blogspot.com \_ Great link -- thanks for sharing it. -mice \_ shucks I thought I was going to see Iraq models in swim suits \-If I think "We're from the Mujahideen and we're not going to hurt you" is the funniest thing I have read in weeks, does that make be a bad person? |
2005/2/2 [Transportation/Car, Consumer/CellPhone] UID:36032 Activity:high |
2/2 What we need is a universal docking station on cars for cellphones. You get into your car and put the cellphone on the dock, then all calls will be put on the speaker and you talk through the in-car mic. What ya think? Any progress being made in this area? It can even be made automatic... \_ As for the data connection, the standard is the Bluetooth headset protocol. Good luck getting a standard for a physical holder. Cell phones have way too much variability in size/shape for that to be practical. \_ not to mention the business reasons why this is doomed. Vendors make a fortune selling add-ons for their particular brands of phone. They want you to buy a new set every time you get a new phone too. Good luck getting them to give up that business to follow some standard. \_ But eventually all these will settle down to a standard. Do you still remember the time each cell phone has its own proprietary headphone connector? Once we have laws banning cellphone use in cars, you bet some company will come up with something. \_ They still have proprietary connectors. I can see everyone supporting bluetooth, but when each phone comes with a charger, there's not much incentive for the manufacturer to standardize on a charger interface. Add to that the fact that size and styling are competitive differentiators and so manufactureres have a lot to lose by standardizing on one physical shape for a dock. I think the best you can do would be a velcro strap on dashboards. \_ The point is not the dock or the charging interface, it's the ability to automatically route the call to the 'car', however its done, wirelessly or something, doesn't matter. and similarily the ability to route calls to land lines when you are home automatically. You bet there will be a surge of interest when all the latest data on cellphone brain cancer pops up in a few years. \_ A lot of phones already have something like this, it's called a *speakerphone*. I set my cell phone in a cupholder, and if I get a call I can reach down and push the speakerphone button, then be hands-free for the conversation. |
2005/2/2 [Politics/Foreign/Europe] UID:36033 Activity:insanely high |
2/2 In spite of what libertarian commentators like to claim, Europe is outperformaing the US economically by almost any measure: http://www.nybooks.com/articles/17726 \_ What do you define as "Europe"? France, Germany, Poland, the UK, Luxembourg and Greece are about as heterogenous economically as it gets. That aside, there is a raft of problems (and advantages) not present in the US. The key word you're looking for is "different." As for the libertarians, there are some areas where "European" bureaucracy is oppressive to business compared to the US, and others where companies have a very free hand. YMMV. -John \_ Germany has highest unemployment since WW II. I do not envy Europeans. Only the massive US debt is an issue for Americans. If that can be tackled then the EU has no hope at all. If it can't then it still might have no hope. \_ The Europeans are now more productive per hour than the Americans. They used to be less, much less productive. How is this trend in our favor again? \_ They still work fewer hours and fewer of them work. The real threat now is China, not the EU. \_ I believe OP's contention is not about the EU as threat but rather as a possibly superior economic model. \_ "Economic threat" \_ Well OP makes the stupid mistake of taking "EU" and not "aspects of certain EU countries". -John \_ http://www.thinkandask.com/news/jobs.html What are the comparative employment rates? \_ http://www.oecd.org/dataoecd/41/15/32504422.pdf \_ GDP growth. http://www.oecd.org/dataoecd/0/17/19230458.xls country:2002q4:2003q1:2003q2:2003q3:2003q4:2004q1:2004q2:2004q3 US:0.2:0.5:1.0:1.8:1.0:1.1:0.8:1.0 France:-0.2:0.2:-0.5:1.0:0.6:0.6:0.6:0.0 Germany:0.0:-0.4:-0.2:0.3:0.3:0.4:0.4:0.1 \_ What is comparable GDP/person? We all know that the population growth rate is higher in the US. That does not really help me as an individual worker. Over the last decade, twenty years, thirty years and fourty years, GDP growth per person has been comparable. \_ Not growth, but only Norway has a higher GDP per capita than the US. http://csua.org/u/ay0 \_ The statement is based on data from csls.ca . (BTW, they misspelled the title of the csls paper. It should be "Output per Hour" instead of "Output per House".) Given the higher relative cost of labor in Europe, it is completely reasonable that Europeans are more productive per hour. (Similarly, Europe's relatively rare farm- land are more productive than the US.) The scarcity and the cost of the resource guarantees the employer (and the farmer) invest more in productivity. In fact, if you look at general labor productivity (not per hour), The US has been outperforming EU by large strides in the last couple decades. by large strides in the last couple decades, most of that based on the large number of hours worked by US employees. http://www.oecd.org/dataoecd/5/47/2483871.xls It is perhaps more accurate to say that Europe has been outperforming the US economically in *one* measure that is not significant at all. \_ No, you either did not read or did not fully understand the URL provided. In GDP/person, the EU has grown faster than the US in the last 15 years. In productivity per hour worked, the EU has gone from behind the US to leading the US. In ROI, the EU has been catching up. In total public debt, the EU has caught up. In short, every significant comparable economic measurable, the US has gone from a large lead to a small lead and in some cases no lead at all. and in some cases to no lead at all. \_ Hmmm, you are right. Europe should brace for the imminent brain drain from the United Stated as more and more professionals realize they are better off working for the new winning team. -- ilyas \_ My French coworkers here are all rather disparaging of the countrymen they've left behind in France. Perhaps it's an Ecole Polytechnique thing. \_ My French coworkers here are all very happy to be away from France. My French acquaintances still in France are feverishly trying to get the hell out. \_ That's sort of what I was trying to get at. If EU economic model is so superior, why are so many european professionals and scientists so desperate to get out of there? -- ilyas \_ Ummm.. because they're stupid? \_ Perhaps you hang out with a desperate and unhappy crowd. Do you have any evidence that is not anecdotal that this is true? \_ Do you have any non-anecdotal evidence that points the other way? Or even anecdotal evidence? All I see is a lot of foreign professionals settling here to work, and foreign scientists getting tenure here. I don't see much traffic the other way. Except John, but (a) he is a commie mutant traitor and (b) .ch isn't even a part of Europe, they are like their own planet. -- ilyas \_ Trust the compter. The computer is your friend. \_ Yes, read The Economist. \_ On a slightly unrelated topic, I read an article in the Economist on 'sister Hillary,' where the author was gushing about Hillary's 'maturity and ambition' as a politician, because she decided to pay lip service to the faith vote. I found that an interesting comment -- she comes across as a lying, insincere scumbag to me when she does stuff like that. Kind of like her husband. Of course, being the biggest scumbag may be what maturity and ambition means in politics. -- ilyas \_ Take a look at the enrollment figures of US grad schools. \_ I have, and the numbers are down. \_ 'The numbers are down' because less \_ fewer people are being let in (due to procedural post 9/11 issues), not because less people want to come here. No cigar for you. \_ Bullshit. The "procedural 9/11 issues" are that the student visa system is completely fucking broken. I know grad students who are afraid to even go to canada for a conference because even though all their visa stuff is ok, there's some random chance that they'll get stuck in canada for so long they have to go back to their home country. For people from countries where they're desperate, they try anyway, and the acceptances are down, but for countries like germany you better believe people are turning down US positions becuase they don't want to put up with the moronic bullshit. And applications to Canadian schools are up. Our broken-ass visa system isn't just letting terrorists in, it's seriously undermining American science. I'm not pp, and I'm not disagreeing with you about professionals in general, just about students and post-docs in the sciences. \_ You do understand that does not mean that european professionals are not leaving in an absolute sense. Also, rather unfortunately, I don't know of any foreign student statistics that breakdown based on the quality of the local school (is the student attending Joe's Foreign Language Institute of Berkeley or UCB?). I would not lament the loss of the Joe's Foreign Language Institute of Berkeley population. \_ Albert H. Teich, director of science and public policy at the American Association for the Advancement of Science, which signed the statement, wrote that not improving the visa situation "will do irreparable harm to scientific progress as well as U.S. competitiveness." Also: "A survey of major graduate institutions, conducted by the Council of Graduate Schools, found a 6-percent decline in new foreign enrollments this fall, the third year in a row with a substantial drop." -tom \_ Mea culpa. I should have made it clearer. When I said "general labor productivity (not per hour)", I was referring to Annex Table 12 "Labour productivity in the business sector", which specifically is *not* about productivity per hour. In fact, I specifically allowed that the producitivity per hour is lower in the US ("it is completely reasonable..."). However, the labor productivity per capita has been growing much faster in the US, likely because of the greater number of hours worked by US workers. Similarly, GDP per hour worked is higher in many other nations, but US is almost tops in GDP per capita. \_ Granted. But how much longer will this continue, with current trends? \_ Well, GDP and productivity growth in the US has been faster in the US for most of the last couple of decades. And it's really not that we've been working *more* hours, it's more that other countries have been working *fewer* hours. The number of hours worked has pretty much stayed unchanged in the US since 1980, but has been dropping elsewhere. \_ Thanks for this interesting info. This is the sort of thing I was looking for. (why is this deleted? is being polite a censorable offence on the motd now??) -OP |
2005/2/2 [Computer/HW, Computer/Domains] UID:36034 Activity:nil |
2/2 is it possible for terrorist to set up fake websites to capture financial info, hijack the DNS servers and make them point to their fake websites? \_ "hijack the DNS servers" is the key point here. Not if the sites are designed properly. |
2005/2/2 [Politics/Domestic] UID:36035 Activity:kinda low |
2/2 So I deleted the entire interesting Europe vs USA growth rate economics discussion because I am a cranky, pissy libertarian who didn't like where the facts were leading me, right? \_ Actually, I assumed you were a pissy authoritarian dickhead that insists on dictating which threads are 'acceptable' by your closed-minded narrow standards. \_ AFAIK, the facts were leading away from the initial conclusion and towards that of cranky, pissy libertarians. \_ Yes, but that assumes the dickhead actually *read* and *understood* any of the thread before coming to his myopic conclusion. |
2005/2/2 [Recreation/Dating, Politics/Domestic/SocialSecurity] UID:36036 Activity:nil |
2/2 Why don't the people who are against social security mention that women live longer then men, and that men are getting screwed out of social security benefits? It's even possible (and common!) for women who have never worked to collect social security based on their dead husband's income! Where's the sanity in that? \_ Because some people believe in society. Some of those people who believe in society think government is best suited to help, and some think churches, communities, etc are best suited. Someone who believes neither, who doesn't believe in society or helping his fellow man is immoral. \_ Uhm, no. That might be the way leftist liberals think, but that's not the reason why women collect 50% on their husband's income. The reason is simple, traditionally women were not in the work force but were expected to stay home and raise the kids. So in essence although they didn't have a paying job they still did work. Since the male was traditionally the primary breadwinner of the family, it was viewed that widows should be able to collect on pensions of the the husband. In reality, such an arrangement logical, since by allowing widows to receive their husband's SSI we compensate the widow for their years of work being a house wife. \_ So you prefer that women enter the work force and leave their children to be raised by baby sitters? You sound like the leftist liberal. \_ No, I like men who abandon their children and don't pay child support (Go Newt!!) \_ Against Social Security? I *love* Social Security. I love it so much that I want to make sure I get my cut of it when I'm eligible. |
2005/2/2 [Computer/HW, Computer/HW/Drives] UID:36037 Activity:nil |
2/2 I have a 7 year old PC (with display) that I'd like to get rid of. Can I just dump it outside of my house and expect it to be picked up by the Berkeley garbage service? \_ http://www.otxwest.org \_ No, it is hazardous waste. Take it here: http://www.accrc.org |
2005/2/2-3 [Reference/Tax] UID:36038 Activity:low |
2/2 (Re-post) Are any of you full-time grad students on fellowship at UC Berkeley? If so, I am curious how you are interpreting the info on your 1099-T. TurboTax is useless here. -- ulysses \_ I'm in grad school and got a 1098-T. I wonder what the difference is. \_ Give your copy to me if its useless to you. :) \_ I'm not sure what to do with my 1099-T here either. It doesn't seem right to not even input it into the program, or return a copy of it, but not really sure. What's even more sad though is that I asked a few people at the SD office where TurboTax is made (I'm a former employee of Intuit), and they had no clue what to do with it either. Worthless bastards. -phale |
2005/2/2-3 [Uncategorized] UID:36039 Activity:nil |
2/2 Mardi Gras parade in Berkeley on FAT TUESDAY, Feb. 8 http://www.berkeleymardigras.org |
2005/2/2-3 [Academia/Berkeley/CSUA/Motd] UID:36040 Activity:very high |
2/2 Wow, point out a little right wing hypocracy regarding family values and all my threads get nuked! Woot! \_ hypocrisy, maybe? \_ jwang is the nuking mother fucker! DIE JWANG!!! One more anti-right wing, one more nuke of my pro conservative post, the entire motd goes. Jwang, I'm watching you. wing, one more nuke of my pro conservative post, the entire motd goes. Jwang, I'm watching you. \_ Oh look! A _death_ threat on the motd! Quick, to the Paolo cave! We must root out this injustice (heh) so all CSUA members can feel safe! -- ilyas \_ Jeez, ilyas, motd seems to have made you bitter. Your tit-for-tat playbook must be huge. \_ It's the Old Testament way, baybee. Paolo's antics and selective enforcement in general are a pet peeve of mine (can you tell?). -- ilyas \_ yes we know you're obsessed with paolo/pst/pollux. have you actually met him in person? he's actually a very nice guy. you on the other hand ... \_ Heh. Me and Paolo know each other pretty well. In fact, I bet I talked to him more recently than you (i.e. today). On the other hand, have you ever met me? You get the 'flawed insinuation of the day' award. What does meeting a person have to do with anything? What does coming across as a 'nice guy' have to do with anything? -- ilyas \_ A death threat?!!? By "death", you mean deleting the motd? Are you being dense on purpose? -!pp \_ "die jwang". who's being dense? -!ilyas \_ I don't think that can rationally be considered a death threat. *shrug* \_ Grow the fuck up. And learn to post to motd correctly. \_ You know what people do when they really grow up? They stop posting to the motd. \_ Oh ouch. That hits a little close to home, doesn't it? \_ That's not true. I grew up and I still post to the motd. \_ Hey, when making threats like this, sign your name. And don't be so sure you know who's doing what on the motd. Maybe someone with root can determine who /you/ are so /you/ can be properly squished. -emarkp \_ uh, the current root no longer cares about motd. It is no longer publicized to new CSUA members. longer publicized to new CSUA members. It is just a matter of time before all the old motd farts grow up, get married, buy a house, and raise kids. Before you even know it no one is posting to motd. I estimate 5-10 years. \_ Sorry, son -- I know alot of sodans that regularly post to motd that have 'grown up', gotten married, bought a house, and have more than 1 kid. You don't know as much as you think you do about motd demographics. \_ Indeed, I'm 31, have been married 9 years, own a house and have 2 children. -emarkp \_ wow. So tell me, would you want your kids to motd? \_ wow. can you possibly have less clue? \_ Since the older one is just reading, I think the question is moot. -emarkp \_ We could have a Katie vs Sujin flamewar! -jrleek \_ I didn't know anyone over 30 other than tom read motd. I'd figure that when you hit your late 30s you'd get a gf, wife, or a life already. Oh well, I hope I'll stop some day. -pathetic mid 20 guy \_ Actually, does anyone know why jwang nukes but never writes? \_ I'd guess because not enough people care whether he has anything to say. \_ When has this ever stopped anyone? -gm \_ Does anyone know why people keep anonymously accusing jwang and ilyas of nuking? I crack up when I nuke a thread and someone else gets blamed by an anonymous yahoo. -emarkp \_ So is your rule something like "WWJN"? \_ I don't know anything about jwang, but do a search through the archives for "nuke" and "ilyas" and the reason people gett pissed at him will become obvious. And for the hundredth time: fuck you for nuking threads. \_ You can tack me on to that last sentiment, though I would say simply "please stop doing it". -- ulysses |
2005/2/2 [Politics/Domestic/Election] UID:36041 Activity:nil |
2/2 http://www.saveourlicense.com Ballot petitions due Feb 11, 2005 |
2005/2/2 [Uncategorized] UID:36042 Activity:nil |
2/2 Conservatism is winning, hoooray!!! Down with immoral people. http://www.cnn.com/2005/LAW/02/02/nude.juice.bar.ap/index.html |
2005/2/2-3 [Science/Space, Science/GlobalWarming] UID:36043 Activity:moderate |
2/2 Dear motd physicists, suppose I have a) 5 100W light bulbs and b) 500W heater. Suppose put them in 2 different thermal tight boxes, each with a liter of water. Will both liter of water have the exact same temperature after time t? \_ No, because 5 light bulbs have a different heat capacity than a 500W heater. If they were the same, then yes, the water would have the same temperature. There are of course special cases where this would be different, but 5x100W light bulbs create just as much heat as a 500W heater. \_ You just contradicted yourself. \_ He didn't really. He said they create just as much heat, but have different heat capacities. Although I'm curious about the special cases she mentions. \_ I was thinking stuff like differential evaporation rates and transient higher electrical loads. \_ One thing to note is that by saying a light bulb is X wats, it does not mean that it puts out X watts of heat; it just means it draws X watts of energy. What is does with those X watts depends on the type of bulb and other details like that. \_ It can basically only put off various forms of electromagnetic energy and sound. If it's placed in a perfect calorimeter (OP's 'thermal tight box') then all the energy it consumes will be turned into heat. \_ You're probably limited by the conductive heat transfer at the air-water interface. Probably the only difference between the two rigs is how much energy goes into visible vs. infrared, and that probably won't matter as the water won't likely heat up very much. \-to spell out the first reply: the simple way to thinks of this is in terms of the Partition Of Energy. the energy in the system will be divided between the water and the heating apparatus. at T0, with energy E0 = Ew0 + Eh0 (or Eb0) [total energy = energy of water + energy of bulb/ heater]. at T1, E1 = E0+dE = Ew1 + Eh1 (Eb1). Since we are assuming dE is the same in both, Ew1 is identical iff the Eh1 and Eb1 are the same ... which is dictated by the heat capacity. [and the heat capacity of the water is how you go from the Ew to the water temp]. Note: in some cases the parition of energy is more complicated and you have to taken into consideration entropy factors. Like say you mix metal A and B into an alloy ... as the compositoon goes from 100% A to 100% B, the melting temp of AB doesnt go in a stright line from meltA to meltB. \- oh here is another one: you take a spring and spend energy E to compress it. then you put it in an acid bath, where does the energy go, if it dissolves from the end. \_ In a compressed spring, the energy is stored in the bonds between atoms. As it dissolves, these bonds get broken one by one, and when that happens, the 2 atoms whoose bond was dissolved convert that bond energy into heat. So a dissolved compressed spring will be hotter than a dissolved relaxed spring. |
7/2 |